The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 29 June 2008, 07:51 PM   #1
Tombstone
"TRF" Member
 
Tombstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Richard
Location: LV, NV
Watch: LV Sub and others
Posts: 2,689
Love Hate Issues With Rolex

I have this love hate issue with Rolex, I have noticed that many of you on this great forum have love hate issues with Rolex as well. I thought it would be fun to read about your opinions with your love hate issues with Rolex. So if you don’t mind please share some.

I figure I would share my big three issues as well. I hate the stem on Rolex watches. I know this sounds small but I don’t like the fact I own several Rolex watches and the crown on the stem on all of them is on a different positions????? You would think at $6,000 a pop Rolex could make the crowns upright. I have been told many reasons as to why the crowns are in a million different positions.

I hate the endless price increases in the long run Rolex will hurt themselves buy their greed.

I hate the fact I can’t enjoy any other watch but Rolex. My Breitlings get very little wrist time but the B on the stem on my Breitlings are all upright. If Breitling can do it I think Rolex could to if they really wanted to.
__________________
Always working...by choice
Tombstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 07:59 PM   #2
swatty
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
swatty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
I'll be back to post more in a minute, just gone to check the crown on my Breitling
swatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 08:00 PM   #3
toph
"TRF" Member
 
toph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
haha- my milgauss is actually bang on but yesterday i tried the gmt II and it was always upside down!!! it annoyed me too- but i was thinking surely if you start the crown in a different position then you will eventually get it upright- well i could not
I feel your dismay
__________________


"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety."

Member No.# 11795
toph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 08:05 PM   #4
swatty
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
swatty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
Well, the crown on my Breitling only has lines on it , so its always aligned.
What do I hate about Rolex?
Only the availabilty of new models .
swatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 08:09 PM   #5
Thani
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Thani
Location: Dubai UAE
Watch: Milgauss 116400 GV
Posts: 2,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by swatty View Post
What do I hate about Rolex?
Only the availabilty of new models .

thats what i love about rolex
Thani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 08:18 PM   #6
swatty
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
swatty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thani View Post
thats what i love about rolex

Love /Hate love /hate .

I suppose you are right Thani
swatty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 08:45 PM   #7
mopsey
"TRF" Member
 
mopsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Martin
Location: London
Watch: Sub,Exp2,BlkBy,SD
Posts: 1,258
I hate the fact that i can only wear one at a time!!
As for the crown, my Date is spot on upright but the Exp.II is at 3 o/clock.
__________________
Lest we forget.
mopsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 09:15 PM   #8
AJF
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Ally
Location: Surrey (UK)
Watch: 15223
Posts: 638
The crown alignment I agree. Not able to get my head around that one at all.

Tolerance levels, I know Rolex at -2 to + 5 secs a days are up their with the very best Crono's, but surely they can get it tighter than that. It is the first thing you notice when you buy a Rolex.

The bling bling image Rolex has developed. Some guy at Glastonbury yesterday even had 30,000 revellers singing "Me and My Rolex" all waving their wrists in the air. The saddest part of it was he was not wearing one, nor most of them.

AJF.

AJF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 09:32 PM   #9
FOUNTAIN RACING
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ANNAPOLIS, MD.
Posts: 116
The bracelets on the sport models feel cheap and noisy.
FOUNTAIN RACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 09:38 PM   #10
OYSTERMANN
"TRF" Member
 
OYSTERMANN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by FOUNTAIN RACING View Post
The bracelets on the sport models feel cheap and noisy.
Agreed - that's what put me off buying the Sub TT, SS and LV. The GMT IIc, on the other hand, has a lovely solid bracelet and that's the one I went for.

Maybe the sports models will have solid links soon.
__________________
Neil

116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007
118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007
116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008
116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009
216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013
116520 SS DAYTONA 2014
OYSTERMANN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 09:55 PM   #11
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
"Hate" is a harsh word.

I don't like the poor quality of Rolex lume. Omega and Seiko do much better.

I don't care much for the increasingly blingy Rolex models.

I find Rolex following the trend "big is better" dubious.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 11:50 PM   #12
Trurolexer
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
I don't like the poor quality of Rolex lume. Omega and Seiko do much better.
X2!!!
But I still more LOVE ROLEX than hate.
Trurolexer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 11:58 PM   #13
ratae1950
"TRF" Member
 
ratae1950's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Cambridge Ma
Posts: 2,331
Ditto

Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
"Hate" is a harsh word.

I don't like the poor quality of Rolex lume. Omega and Seiko do much better.

I don't care much for the increasingly blingy Rolex models.

I find Rolex following the trend "big is better" dubious.
Could not agree more.
__________________
Yunnoworameenmiduck
ratae1950 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2008, 01:04 AM   #14
Portzed
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Bryden
Location: Lincolnshire - UK
Watch: My 1st 60's Timex
Posts: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER View Post
"Hate" is a harsh word.

I don't like the poor quality of Rolex lume. Omega and Seiko do much better.

I don't care much for the increasingly blingy Rolex models.

I find Rolex following the trend "big is better" dubious.
My thoughts entirely Bo well said old chap
Portzed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 09:56 PM   #15
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Some of the bracelets and clasps look and feel cheap for a 5k watch

Poor lume
__________________



GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 10:15 PM   #16
AJF
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Ally
Location: Surrey (UK)
Watch: 15223
Posts: 638
You never know, someone from Rolex R&D might well be a member and is taking note of the comments on this thread.

AJF.
AJF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2008, 10:50 PM   #17
newrolexman
"TRF" Member
 
newrolexman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 1,081
I never liked the Rolex models where you can see the pins coming through on each side of the clasp. Made it look like any ordinary watch, ie, citizen, seiko.

With the advent of the new models, the pins dont show anymore,., 1000% improvement in my opinion.

That one feature made me fall for the new GMT ll c

I am sure every model will eventually have that finished look and more will pique my interest.


D
newrolexman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2008, 12:13 AM   #18
Ed Rooney
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
I'm 3 for 3 with my crowns lining up correctly.

I love the new bracelet. I hate the center links.

I think they did a better job with the ceramic sub/dssd bezels than with the GMT.

I think Breitling is really scaring them. Maybe the competition will be good.
Ed Rooney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2008, 12:18 AM   #19
nko51
"TRF" Member
 
nko51's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Alex
Location: USA
Watch: TT Blue Sub
Posts: 2,542
I think the sub clasps need some streamlining.
__________________
nko51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2008, 12:21 AM   #20
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,494
I don't like the latest blocky cases...
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2008, 12:32 AM   #21
Baptistman
"TRF" Member
 
Baptistman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Posts: 2,405
Wow, lets face it, when Rolex issued watchs such as the Sub etc, they were amongst market firsts in so many areas. The bracelets stood the test of time and in many hostile environments. One of the reasons I believe Rolex are so successful is that they have not endlessly followed Market trends up until now (and even then it's quite subtle) The designs span over 5 decades, however the price for basically the same watch from the 50's 60's today has risen immensly, but then hasent everything.

My 14060M has some subtle improvements, but Its very similar to a Sub of yesteryear, and I like that. Hate, the only thing I dislike about Rolex, price increases and some of the changes, my pet one is foregoing the Classic GMT Master for the new GMT beast.
__________________
Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it
Baptistman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2008, 12:38 AM   #22
RW16610
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
RW16610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Rommel
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 9,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baptistman View Post
Wow, lets face it, when Rolex issued watchs such as the Sub etc, they were amongst market firsts in so many areas. The bracelets stood the test of time and in many hostile environments. One of the reasons I believe Rolex are so successful is that they have not endlessly followed Market trends up until now (and even then it's quite subtle) The designs span over 5 decades, however the price for basically the same watch from the 50's 60's today has risen immensly, but then hasent everything.

My 14060M has some subtle improvements, but Its very similar to a Sub of yesteryear, and I like that. Hate, the only thing I dislike about Rolex, price increases and some of the changes, my pet one is foregoing the Classic GMT Master for the new GMT beast.
Yeah I agree with you on what was said above there.
RW16610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2008, 12:51 AM   #23
Marrk
"TRF" Member
 
Marrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,192
Larry said: "Blocky cases"

Bo said: "I find Rolex following the trend 'big is better' dubious."

I would add: With regard to a beautiful watch like the GMTc: At least put a bracelet on it that matches those big lugs and cases. As it is, the bracelet seems disproportionately small. [This is not really a "hate," I guess. Just an observation.]

The only thing I'm agonizing about right now is RSC B.H. I've said bad things about them before, and I have "sworn off" going there any more, but I'd really like to have my 14060m regulated (at an RSC). Must I send my watch from L.A. to N.Y, just to be satisfied about getting a job done properly? I guess I'm in the OCD Club.

As usual, I hate being me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
I don't like the latest blocky cases...
Marrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2008, 01:14 AM   #24
Cmaster03
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marrk View Post

The only thing I'm agonizing about right now is RSC B.H. I've said bad things about them before, and I have "sworn off" going there any more, but I'd really like to have my 14060m regulated (at an RSC). Must I send my watch from L.A. to N.Y, just to be satisfied about getting a job done properly? I guess I'm in the OCD Club.

As usual, I hate being me.
Well, call me superstitious or just cautious, but if mine needs any regulation or service any time soon, I would send it to NY or Dallas, just based on horror stories I've read on Rolex forums.

BTW, guess you could sign me up for the OCD club, too. Just see my jumping hands while hacking posts. Scratches and scuffs don't bother me a bit, but those little hands lining up? Drives me bonkers. I am trying to become less OC, and thanks to my wife and a loving support group of friends and family I am getting better. Honest.

Just keep saying this : "Every day, in every way, I'm getting better and better"

Cmaster03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.