ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
7 January 2016, 02:37 AM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Hickory
Posts: 243
|
16610LV v. 116610LV
Hi,
Another this vs. that thread I know, get "what sings" to you, but often, initial impressions are not lasting impressions, so want to get opinions across the board. Both watches appeal to me, but only one can make into my collection. Please ignore what else I have. 16610LV; +++ I prefer case design (more elegant vs bulky) + Not flashy + Maxi dial - - Bracelet feels cheap ( I know, its diver's watch, but in this price range function AND form matter) 116610LV ++ Amazing Dial ++ Bracelet is best in business + Maxi Dial - very green - - I am trying to adjust to those lugs, so this is a double negative at this point. I find it to be bulky and heavy What are your thoughts? |
7 January 2016, 02:43 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,221
|
LVC, the new bracelet is a triple plus.
|
7 January 2016, 03:00 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
7 January 2016, 02:43 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Sounds like you prefer the 16610LV
|
7 January 2016, 02:45 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Chichester
Watch: Tudor Black Bay
Posts: 1,598
|
A Rolex 16610LV is my next watch! Not even a close contest for me.
Dan
__________________
Tudor Heritage Black Bay 79220R (2015) Tudor Black Bay GMT 79830RB (2022) Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight 79030B (2023) |
7 January 2016, 02:47 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Hickory
Posts: 243
|
|
7 January 2016, 03:00 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Dan
Location: Chichester
Watch: Tudor Black Bay
Posts: 1,598
|
I kick myself on a daily basis for not buying one new when I had that chance a few years back (when they were £3.5k). I want to buy one now so I am just waiting for the right one to come along (too expensive to source from US due to import tax). The reason for liking the original over the current model is down to my strong dislike of the Maxi Case. Good luck.
Dan
__________________
Tudor Heritage Black Bay 79220R (2015) Tudor Black Bay GMT 79830RB (2022) Tudor Black Bay Fifty-Eight 79030B (2023) |
7 January 2016, 03:01 AM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Hickory
Posts: 243
|
Quote:
Yea maxi case is a big negative to me Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
7 January 2016, 02:46 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Boston
Posts: 662
|
|
7 January 2016, 02:47 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
I prefer the sunburst dial and bracelet/glidelock on the LVc. I find the LV's bezel to be more loud than the LVc's more subdued green.
|
7 January 2016, 03:53 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
|
x2
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich |
7 January 2016, 02:55 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
you cant go wrong either way. i like the original more however.
|
7 January 2016, 03:37 AM | #13 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
unless you're buying to collect and not to wear, I would hands down pick the LVC (which I have). The 16610LV was never really in consideration for me. I never really liked the green color in the bezel and the clash between the black dial and green bezel just didn't work for me.
Color aside, I think you're right on with your assessments. The proportions of the 5 digit are definitely better from a pure design standpoint. The case is a bit more elegant, not as aggressive as the super case and definitely more comfortable on the wrist. But with all that said, I wasn't a believer of the new case design and all the sudden a switch flipped, and now I'm obsessed with it. I love the wide stance and enlarged presence. The issue of comfort disappears after a pretty short period. Going back to color for a sec, we all know and seem to agree the LVC dial is amazing. It shows at least 4 different shades in different light and they're all incredible. The bezel color is unfortunately either for you, or not for you, but I will say it also changes color a bit depending on the light. It took me a couple times in person to really appreciate the overall color configuration of the LVC. Ceramic vs Aluminum as kind of another one of these, you pick a side. I was indifferent for a while but after a full year of wearing my LVC I am absolutely sold on the ceramic. I think it gets more and more stunning every time I look at my wrist. The bracelet on the LVC as we all know is magnificent. The 16610 bracelet really can't even get in the same ring. Anyway, i think you know my vote |
7 January 2016, 03:49 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,827
|
I like them both very much.
BUT, right now I have to give the edge to the LV. I have had both and still have the LV (in fairness, I only gave away the LVC because I asked my COO what watch he would want and he said the only one would be the green Rolex that I bought literally days before. so now it is his). In fact, since I got it, I have not taken it off (i bought it a few days after giving away the LVC). To me, I was always concerned about the bracelet of the 5 digit watches. I no longer have concerns. In fact, I find them to be much more comfortable as they are ligther. And I have not had a need at all to make any micro adjustments with the LV, whereas I was always fiddling with the LVC. If I were diving and I needed the glide lock, I would be all for the LVC. But for the free diving, swimming, and sport type play I get involved in, the LV is a clear winner. It is much less in your face and he case is (and I hate to say it) cleaner and easier on the eyes. I am honestly shocked that I have this opinion. I did not think I would. But since getting the LV, I do.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
7 January 2016, 03:56 AM | #15 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
Quote:
I think this is one of those cases where the pros and cons can be flopped pretty easily. E.g. The LVC is a little more " in your face" as Seth put it, and I have to admit, I kind of like that about it. To me the shinier bezel, sunburst dial, wider case and added polished sides on the links all make for a little more pop. Which I dig |
|
7 January 2016, 04:07 AM | #16 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,827
|
Quote:
truth is, in my opinion, they are both great looking and functioning watches. and every time i look at your pictures (and see it on my COO), i want it back. it really all just depends on what each individual is looking for. for a lot of reasons, i like something a bit "in your face" as well. can't go wrong with either.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
|
7 January 2016, 03:51 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
LVc.
|
7 January 2016, 03:59 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 353
|
i like the 16610LV...
The 116610LV is too much green for me.. For the black model, 11660LN all day. Glide lock is amazing. |
7 January 2016, 04:11 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: John
Location: UK
Watch: GMT2C, Sub LVC
Posts: 798
|
👍🏻
__________________
GMT2 Ceramic 2012. 2015 ”Hulk” Submariner. 2015 white dial 116520. |
7 January 2016, 04:14 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
ceramic ,you could always send it in for a diet , lugs thinned and crown guard eithe slimmed or removed ,,,
id be in the old case camp though. |
7 January 2016, 04:16 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
|
The LV is not very appealing to me. I say if you're going to go green - go GREEN! There are just way too many great updates on the LVC that you would miss out on. Also, LV's are going for way more than I personally think they are worth. I'm hoping to have my LVC soon. I have the next one reserved at my AD.
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
7 January 2016, 04:59 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Watch: SS White Daytona
Posts: 1,060
|
|
7 January 2016, 05:20 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,792
|
LVc... Easy choice for me.
|
7 January 2016, 05:25 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Manassas,Virginia
Watch: Ol'Bluesy & Hulk
Posts: 2,871
|
For a daily wearer the Hulk all the way. Solid link bracelet and CNC machined clasp are light years ahead of the former stamped steel and hollow link design.
From an investment standpoint, an early generation Kermit fetches the big bucks now and prices for safe queens and gently worn used models will continue to rise. Especially if its the lime green shaded bezel insert. I own the Hulk and love it. After looking at hundreds of pics of it here on the forum, I went to an AD to see one in person and knew it was for me. Bought one BNIB from Jizeal one of our trusted sellers here. |
7 January 2016, 05:33 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Dave
Location: Alabama
Watch: 2006 Submariner LV
Posts: 669
|
LV For Me.
|
7 January 2016, 05:38 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Texas
Watch: Grandpa's Tissot
Posts: 733
|
LVc. The dial is special IMO.
|
7 January 2016, 05:42 AM | #27 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Mike
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 22,514
|
The classic sub is awesome but the ceramic version can't be beat.
|
7 January 2016, 05:46 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: Alex
Location: New York
Watch: 1603
Posts: 243
|
LV if I had to choose. The old case design outweighs the benefits of the new bracelet for me. And I also prefer the green/black combination over the all-out-green of the ceramic successor.
|
7 January 2016, 05:46 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northeast
Posts: 943
|
LV. My daily watch for the last 8 yrs.
I can't warm up to the lugs and sheen of the ceramic bezel.
__________________
16610LV 16200 116600 116500 |
7 January 2016, 05:55 AM | #30 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
this should be a poll.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.