ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
20 January 2019, 01:36 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 286
|
Will younger adults in the near future be interested in Rolex Watches?
Had a conversation with a few buddies of mine and would like to hear these forums thoughts on the matter.
Incase I didn't make it clear with the title let me say this, will a 18 to 28 year old be interested in Rolex Watches let's say in the year 2030? I think Rolex isn't going to dwindle down anytime soon, but my friends say that brands like Apple have shifted the way people look at watches. "Why look at a watch just for time when I could look at it for a text and/or email as well?" he claims would be the thought process of a person who is 23 in the year 2030. I understand some of their points, technology is getting more and more advanced sooner than later. But will Luxury watches be something people look into in the future or will it be all about the digital or smart watch scene? Maybe I'm biased but I think people like myself who purchased their first Rolex at 21 will still be out in the world in 2030/2040/2050 and so on... what do you guys think? Sent from my SM-G950U1 using Tapatalk |
20 January 2019, 01:44 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,911
|
Many think the Apple Watch will do for the watch industry with the current up and coming generation what Swatch did for the previous one and I tend to agree. What the both were successful at is getting young people excited and accustomed to wearing a watch. At some point those that become affluent later in life may then be more likely to buy a nice Swiss timepiece either due to genuine interest or for a status symbol. Either way a net positive for the high end watch industry and Rolex. Plus, by that time Apple will have moved off wearable tech and you will have an Apple chip in your brain.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
20 January 2019, 01:46 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 286
|
|
20 January 2019, 03:53 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,809
|
|
20 January 2019, 06:22 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,964
|
Quote:
I've been a die hard mechanical watch guy since I started collecting 15 years ago and have been a Never Ever Apple Watch guy since the came out, but that all changed Dec 31, 2018 when I bought an AW Series 4. Now I'm not saying I'm selling all my mechanicals yet, but I will say I'm much more impressed, smitten even, with the AW than I ever expected possible. Only time will tell (pun intended) if I put the AW away again in the future and return to the mechanicals, but for now they sit in the watch box to be work occasionally while I for this out. And just for reference, I'm 56 year old.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 126619LB, 116710BLNR, and 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster and Planet Ocean 42; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Nomos Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & SuperOcean 44; Doxa 300 Pro Carbon; Stowa Limette; Laco Napa Flieger; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too |
|
20 January 2019, 01:45 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DM[V]
Watch: 16710 | 16600
Posts: 3,546
|
I remember when calculator watches were all the rave.
__________________
Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
20 January 2019, 03:24 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,454
|
Me, too, and I also remember swearing that I'd never own another mechanical watch again when the digital watches first became affordable in the mid-Seventies.
Boy, was I ever wrong.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
30 January 2019, 01:17 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: James
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Bleu/Noir
Posts: 185
|
|
1 February 2019, 06:13 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 537
|
|
1 February 2019, 01:48 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: James
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Bleu/Noir
Posts: 185
|
Quote:
Those were so fun, i remember my cousin had the action man one i think those watches were considered high end for us hahaha, until my dad came and beat the chinese out of me for trolling him Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
2 February 2019, 05:42 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 537
|
Quote:
I liked to play around with the TVs at restaurants, especially when there was a football or basketball game on. Nobody ever suspected some kid with a watch |
|
20 January 2019, 01:46 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,641
|
I tend to agree - the mechanical tech is already not necessary, this won’t change in 2030, but there will always be that inextricable draw to a mechanical mechanism and beautifully constructed/ finished case/dial aesthetic.
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.” ― Winston S. Churchill |
20 January 2019, 10:47 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,355
|
And also showing off.....as we all know there are plenty of people who buy watches as a statement or to fill some void in their makeup....if the world becomes less materialistic as we finally accept that stuff dont make the man then a large portion of would be buyers will dwindle.....or maybe not
|
20 January 2019, 11:47 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,641
|
Quote:
Also true - watches will most likely still serve as a Veblen good for many.
__________________
“My tastes are simple; I am easily satisfied with the best.” ― Winston S. Churchill |
|
20 January 2019, 11:48 PM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
|
Quote:
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition) |
|
20 January 2019, 01:54 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
If by then people are constantly glued to a screen reading text and emails as they apparently are at present I'll be happy to be the odd one out with my old watches. There will be demand accompanying price decreases too so bonus for me. It's gonna be great (I was never Mr. Popular).
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
20 January 2019, 02:01 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Ryan
Location: Delaware
Watch: 216570, 116710LN
Posts: 185
|
My 9yr old is already obsessed with watches. Right now he wears a vivo fit jr which is just an activity tracker. But he loves having a watch on his wrist. He’s already bugging me for my watches. I told him he can have my Tag Aquaracer automatic,when he graduates HS. Then when he graduates college he can have his pick of which one of my Rolex he wants. I started my love of watches very early as well with a swatch back in the 80’s. So I have no doubt there will still be an affinity in the future generations.
|
20 January 2019, 01:56 PM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: nyc
Posts: 6,713
|
i posted this in another thread about the same topic today - with all the references to rolex/ap/patek in hip hop i don't see there being a loss of interest especially considering its the most popular genre of music in the US now. essentially free marketing for these brands lol although i don't know how they feel about it
|
20 January 2019, 02:01 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Tom
Location: Honolulu
Watch: 116519LN
Posts: 3,828
|
My son is 15 and he received an Apple Watch for his birthday. He wore it for about 3 months and was thoroughly enjoying it. One weekend he had a Model UN event and he asked if he could borrow one of my watches. I asked him what was wrong with his watch and he said he wants to exude class, so I let him choose one. He chose my Speedmaster, excellent choice. Since then he sold his Apple Watch and he is the new caretaker of my Soeedy.
|
20 January 2019, 02:37 PM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mark P
Location: Toronto
Watch: SS Wimbledon DJ41
Posts: 2,046
|
Quote:
Exuding class is one thing, personifing class is another. A luxo watch doesn't make a person "classy" - their actions do. Mark Sent from my SM-A520W using Tapatalk |
|
20 January 2019, 02:40 PM | #21 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,502
|
We were discussing these same questions a decade or so ago.
You know, back when nobody but me and a few others were buying GMT's..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
20 January 2019, 03:21 PM | #22 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,505
|
Quote:
And we could have asked this same question every ten years since 1950.
__________________
E |
|
20 January 2019, 06:35 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Norway
Posts: 629
|
I think «we» is the important factor in your logic. «They» have never experienced a time when «our» watches served a purpose. Unfortunately, I am unable to find a reason why watches would not follow the same laws as everything else which is developed, substituded or obsolete. Like horses, in a few decades, mechanical watches will be regarded as a novelty.
|
20 January 2019, 06:46 PM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 587
|
I think there is a fine line between Rolex manufacturing enough new stock versus over-saturating the market and thus killing some of the future want for a Rolex.
I think Rolex is a status symbol because it's a great watch and that's been continuously beat into peoples' heads for a long time. That won't change in 20 years. People don't buy watches because it tells time. We all have phones for that now. Thus, there has to be another reason. Many buy it as jewelry, some buy it because it serves a purpose (a traveler who buys a GMT), some buy it as a status symbol, some buy it due to the history and craftsmanship (although this is a vast minority now). |
20 January 2019, 02:50 PM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Tom
Location: Honolulu
Watch: 116519LN
Posts: 3,828
|
Quote:
|
|
20 January 2019, 02:04 PM | #26 |
Facilitator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,564
|
Quality is timeless and future generations will for many reasons always value a fine timepiece.
__________________
Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim |
20 January 2019, 02:07 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 286
|
|
20 January 2019, 02:16 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Joe
Location: Western MA
Posts: 1,211
|
My coworker was telling me recently how kids today don’t know about classic rock bands and how they will be forgotten in the near future. I pointed out to him that my teenage niece has The Doors and Led Zeppelin posters hanging in her bedroom.
The classics will never go out of style. And I doubt technology will ever replace high end luxury products. |
20 January 2019, 02:31 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 842
|
Most young people are just interested in having fun...sex.. and eventually... jobs and money..
..they have never been all that interested in watches per se..let alone expensive watches..as thats really an adults game.. I don't think expensive watches will be in play forever..and will eventually go the way of mechanical cameras.. vinyl records...and film..and...the dodo bird...lol.. There will be some still wearing a Rolex here and there....and those who provide such fine products..but as an exception...rather than the rule..perhaps enough sales though to keep em in biz.. But.. Watches are definitely not a growth industry..even though there seems to be a ok growth in sales at the moment..for some brands.. I would not count on long term sustainability.. ..or interest over the long haul.. |
20 January 2019, 02:33 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Sydney
Watch: 16523, 116610LV
Posts: 762
|
I know a few fellas in their late teens/ early twenties who aspire to owning a Rolex one day.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.