The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 February 2009, 02:36 PM   #1
explorer ii lover
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 12
rolex case 40mm................

do you guys think rolex will come out with watches with bigger cases (besides yachtmaster) ....it seems to be becoming more and more the trend imo....i love by explorer ii but i think it would look amazing at 44-46mm
explorer ii lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2009, 02:41 PM   #2
bodybump
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller
 
bodybump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,233
ummmm good question..but only Rolex will know....i hope they make a bigger ss daytona..
__________________
bodybump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2009, 02:54 PM   #3
explorer ii lover
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 12
now im noticing there are some bigger cases coming out.....the new sea-dweller has a 43mm case
explorer ii lover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2009, 04:47 PM   #4
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,496
I don't think that they will.........

Neither the bigger Day-Date II at 41mm, or the DSSD at 43mm, or even the Yachtmaster II at 43mm, has been a big success..

There is no reason for them to decide that the watches that are selling should be up-sized to the watches that are not selling.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2009, 04:50 PM   #5
coddger
"TRF" Member
 
coddger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Only Mom Knows
Location: Land Of The Free
Watch: 116520,16610,16013
Posts: 1,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
I don't think that they will.........

Neither the bigger Day-Date II at 41mm, or the DSSD at 43mm, or even the Yachtmaster II at 43mm, has been a big success..

There is no reason for them to decide that the watches that are selling should be up-sized to the watches that are not selling.
completely agree !
__________________
Contentment Is Not The Fulfillment Of Getting All The Watches You Want, It Is The Realization Of How Many Rolexes You Already Have.
coddger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2009, 06:40 PM   #6
Singslinger
"TRF" Member
 
Singslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: singapore
Posts: 6,424
Rolex is notorious for not following the crowd so I think it's unlikely. But hey, I wouldn't mind if they did..
Singslinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2009, 09:09 PM   #7
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
I don't think that they will.........

Neither the bigger Day-Date II at 41mm, or the DSSD at 43mm, or even the Yachtmaster II at 43mm, has been a big success..

There is no reason for them to decide that the watches that are selling should be up-sized to the watches that are not selling.
Have to agree Larry 40mm is plenty big enough even for large wrists.And all this supersize this and supersize that, in reality we are talking about a few mm bigger.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 06:49 AM   #8
Gasoil4ever
"TRF" Member
 
Gasoil4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cameroun
Watch: GS Snowflake
Posts: 1,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
I don't think that they will.........

Neither the bigger Day-Date II at 41mm, or the DSSD at 43mm, or even the Yachtmaster II at 43mm, has been a big success..

There is no reason for them to decide that the watches that are selling should be up-sized to the watches that are not selling.
I do agree 40mm is to my eyes the perfect size for a sport watch

BUT

Its difficult for very expensive watches to be great successes... over 25000€ for the YMII, over 20.000 for the DDII and the cheapest one being the DSSD... which is 7.500€... is a very thick watch not easy to wear if you are less than 1m85 tall and you need to like the litterature on the rehaut... so i guess size is not the matter here...

Lets see what happens if the DJ 41mm comes out...

Besides, Rolex did intriduce all those large models... and they continue... DSSD being the latest addition...
__________________
16710 GMT Master II "M" , SD4000, GS Snowflake, Stowa Marine Original.
Gasoil4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2009, 08:10 PM   #9
Trurolexer
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
I think Rolex just fine with 40mm for sport models.
Trurolexer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2009, 08:38 PM   #10
Omega_Precision
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Henry
Location: CA, US
Watch: ing basketball
Posts: 2,977
I don't think it's a trend that Rolex is following.

It's more like an evolution right now and we are in the swing of it. Just like the small wrist watch of the past, it evolves from era to era.
Omega_Precision is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 February 2009, 08:49 PM   #11
yannis
"TRF" Member
 
yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
They take cautious steps but they cannot ignore the trend altogether. Hence we got the 43mm DeepSea, the YM2, 41mm versions of Day-Date and hopefully Date-Just. The GMT-IIc also changed and looks bigger although it has remained at 40mm.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV | Tudor 79220N



yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 02:59 AM   #12
Rebel
"TRF" Member
 
Rebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,241
I wish Rolex made a mid-size in the sport model. Can't help the body size I was born with. Small wrists nothwithstanding, I wear and love the sport models....just wish I
had a choice of a smaller size.

I may be the only Rolex customer that feels that way.
__________________
-------------------------------
Member of the Nylon Nation
Rebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 03:22 AM   #13
vapalux
"TRF" Member
 
vapalux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Si
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 1,655
40mm is just fine IMHO for the majority of watches. While discussing this with an AD he said the fad would eventually die out as people went back to the 'good old days'

Still looking forward to the larger DJ though, and the TT ceramic I tried on was awesome in the case and weight. It was perfect for me , I just wasn't to struck on the yellow not looking like gold!

Si
vapalux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 03:57 AM   #14
kokovovoru
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 192
I hope they don't increase thier case size - thickness maybe. 40mm is fine for me because I don't want Rolex to look like a Cartier Santos 100 XL, or a Panarai, or an Omega. Some of these watches are just giagantic for my suits and clothings.
kokovovoru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 04:17 AM   #15
ocwatching
"TRF" Member
 
ocwatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
The larger watches just looks more like jewelry and not a "sports" watch..IMHO
__________________
too much into watches...
ocwatching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 04:17 AM   #16
touchdowntodd
"TRF" Member
 
touchdowntodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Todd (Richard)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Watch: Deep Sea Sea Dwell
Posts: 535
40mm is the tradition, and i dont see em breakin it... i also hope they dont
__________________
2013 DSSD! (ME)
M Series OP No Date,White Arabic,Smooth Bezel(WIFE)
Yachtmaster 1 SS/PLAT (wife)
touchdowntodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 06:16 AM   #17
dardeca
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: US
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 2,474
40mm is perfect, IMO!!
dardeca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 06:53 AM   #18
dkpw
"TRF" Member
 
dkpw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: Scotland
Watch: 16610 & 214270
Posts: 1,294
To a couple of friends of mine, 40mm is too large and the Sub is too heavy. 38mm or 38mm is their preferred size.
__________________
Sub 16610, Explorer 214270, Ω Speedy Pro & many others.

David
dkpw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 06:57 AM   #19
Gasoil4ever
"TRF" Member
 
Gasoil4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Cameroun
Watch: GS Snowflake
Posts: 1,534
Having the choice would be great... i mean, its all a matter of size... the wearer's size...
__________________
16710 GMT Master II "M" , SD4000, GS Snowflake, Stowa Marine Original.
Gasoil4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 07:31 AM   #20
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
I don't think Rolex's case style is compatible with larger watches. Somehow the proportions just don't work. I saw the 41mm DD and it just looks weird. I have yet to see the 43mm DSSD.

For the Rolex case, I think 40mm is just about perfect.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 07:43 AM   #21
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,185
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
I don't think Rolex's case style is compatible with larger watches. Somehow the proportions just don't work. I saw the 41mm DD and it just looks weird. I have yet to see the 43mm DSSD.

For the Rolex case, I think 40mm is just about perfect.
You might be on to something there. A Rolex always seems to "wear" larger than it's measurements, even the DateJust. Some watch designs "wear" smaller than their given size. Maybe the Oyster design has hit it's relative limits. Or maybe we've just gotten used what's familiar.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 10:07 AM   #22
housemad
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: David
Location: Montreal
Watch: Graham chr.GMT O/S
Posts: 373
Bigger is better

I think it's about time Rolex comes with new bigger watch!!! (43 to 47mm)!!!
I have 2 Panerai 112 and 217 : 44 and 47mm
I have 1 Graham oversize chronofighter GMT: 46mm
I have 1 Bell&Ross: BR-01: 46mm
I have 1 U-Boat: 55mm
I have 1 IWC Big-pilot: 46mm
I have 1 Girard Perregaux Sea Hawk pro Oracle BMW: 44mm
I have 1 Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Orange scuba: 44mm
and 1 Omega Seamaster GMT 50th.anniversary 41mm

and my new Rolex Green sub LV only 40mm...

Love the watch but after always find it small after wearing my other ones!
housemad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 10:19 AM   #23
touchdowntodd
"TRF" Member
 
touchdowntodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Todd (Richard)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Watch: Deep Sea Sea Dwell
Posts: 535
[QUOTE=housemad;986275]
I have 1 Graham oversize chronofighter GMT: 46mm
QUOTE]


my DREAM WATCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
2013 DSSD! (ME)
M Series OP No Date,White Arabic,Smooth Bezel(WIFE)
Yachtmaster 1 SS/PLAT (wife)
touchdowntodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 09:53 PM   #24
housemad
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: David
Location: Montreal
Watch: Graham chr.GMT O/S
Posts: 373
Quote:
Originally Posted by housemad View Post
I think it's about time Rolex comes with new bigger watch!!! (43 to 47mm)!!!
I have 2 Panerai 112 and 217 : 44 and 47mm
I have 1 Graham oversize chronofighter GMT: 46mm
I have 1 Bell&Ross: BR-01: 46mm
I have 1 U-Boat: 55mm
I have 1 IWC Big-pilot: 46mm
I have 1 Girard Perregaux Sea Hawk pro Oracle BMW: 44mm
I have 1 Audemars Piguet Royal Oak Orange scuba: 44mm
and 1 Omega Seamaster GMT 50th.anniversary 41mm

and my new Rolex Green sub LV only 40mm...

Love the watch but after always find it small after wearing my other ones!
We are not criticizing the 40mm watches but look above at the concurrency's average size!!! I am sur Rolex is loosing a few costumers for this matter!
The only reason why I purchase a Rolex is for the quality of the watch...it is a must and a classic for a watch collector! Rolex have more competition today than 20 or 30 years ago! ...and yes people are larger than before!
housemad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 08:22 AM   #25
leopardprey
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Chad
Location: Around the world
Watch: Panerai 233
Posts: 4,204
Wish Rolex would. 40mm is a little small for the average size man in the USA these days, and the younger crowd is getting larger. I think Rolex should plus them all up to 42 or 43mm. On my wrist a 40mm Rolex looks a tad small.

The reason why the DSSD is not selling, at least to me, is not the increased diameter (I love it!) but the increase case thickness and not increasing the bracelet size. Made it uncomfortable when I tried it on. If Rolex would make a Sub or Explorer II or GMT II the same diameter as the DSSD, and keep it the same thickness as then current models have, it would be ideal! (the DDII and YMII are not selling well, IMHO, more do do with the price and overall dial designs).
leopardprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 10:40 AM   #26
aleeboy
"TRF" Member
 
aleeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Russel
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 755
Quote:
Originally Posted by leopardprey View Post
Wish Rolex would. 40mm is a little small for the average size man in the USA these days, and the younger crowd is getting larger. I think Rolex should plus them all up to 42 or 43mm. On my wrist a 40mm Rolex looks a tad small.

The reason why the DSSD is not selling, at least to me, is not the increased diameter (I love it!) but the increase case thickness and not increasing the bracelet size. Made it uncomfortable when I tried it on. If Rolex would make a Sub or Explorer II or GMT II the same diameter as the DSSD, and keep it the same thickness as then current models have, it would be ideal! (the DDII and YMII are not selling well, IMHO, more do do with the price and overall dial designs).
This has me curious. How big is the average man in the US?

I am 6'0 and 200lbs solid. I think my Pilot Chrono is approaching a ridiculous size for me. I also think that the 40mm sports models are perfect in size.

I can't make any sense of the bigger watch trend. Especially when a lot of people look like they're wearing a novelty watch.

Long live the 40mm sport models.
aleeboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 08:23 AM   #27
touchdowntodd
"TRF" Member
 
touchdowntodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Todd (Richard)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Watch: Deep Sea Sea Dwell
Posts: 535
they can if they want, ill just collect only the 40mm ones
__________________
2013 DSSD! (ME)
M Series OP No Date,White Arabic,Smooth Bezel(WIFE)
Yachtmaster 1 SS/PLAT (wife)
touchdowntodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 10:27 AM   #28
housemad
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: David
Location: Montreal
Watch: Graham chr.GMT O/S
Posts: 373
Thanks touchdowntodd!!!

Beside the quality and the prestige my Audemars is...Forced to admit my Graham is my favorite one...It caught the eye like you can't beleived! It is realy outstanding!
housemad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 10:31 AM   #29
touchdowntodd
"TRF" Member
 
touchdowntodd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Todd (Richard)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Watch: Deep Sea Sea Dwell
Posts: 535
when u sell it sell cheap, and call me! hahaa i wish
__________________
2013 DSSD! (ME)
M Series OP No Date,White Arabic,Smooth Bezel(WIFE)
Yachtmaster 1 SS/PLAT (wife)
touchdowntodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 February 2009, 10:51 AM   #30
housemad
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: David
Location: Montreal
Watch: Graham chr.GMT O/S
Posts: 373
Quote:
Originally Posted by touchdowntodd View Post
when u sell it sell cheap, and call me! hahaa i wish
Your dollar is getting higher than the Canadian dollars...come to Montreal... you will getting it cheaper...no taxes...and women arn't so bad lol!!!

Visit Matt & Baily site for your Graham!

David.
housemad is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.