The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 February 2020, 10:24 AM   #1
wappinghigh
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Australia
Watch: 14270 14060
Posts: 318
Current "big case" 40mm GMT vs older 40mm 16710

For those people who have both, could they kindly tell me if the current GMT wears exactly the same as the older 16710?

In partic if the Jubilee bracelet makes it wear a bit smaller...?

I've had a 16710 with the old rattly oyster bracelet on my wrist and it wears great on my puney little wrists, but I simply have never actually seen a current GMT.. let alone had the chance to put one on.

They are simply unicorns here. They aren't even available as demos...And if one shows up on a local grey dealers website (who actually has a bricks and mortar store).. they are gone before you get a chance to go in and check em out..

Would appreciate the help. The new Pepsi on a jubilee looks a mighty fine watch!

W
wappinghigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2020, 01:36 PM   #2
Lex_Ordo
"TRF" Member
 
Lex_Ordo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 298
New Ceramic GMT II wears a little taller on the wrist than the 16710, it's slightly heavier, and the trip-lock winding crown, reminds me of a Sub.
HTH
Lex_Ordo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2020, 01:43 PM   #3
WatchNutcase
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: UK / EU & Canada
Watch: Sub 114060
Posts: 1,349
I'm after that Pepsi on Jubilee as well. Had the chance to try it on recently and it wears great on a tiny wrist like you and I have. Partly due to the Jubilee bracelet I'd say, but the case size really wasnt too large at all, I really thought it would wear a lot larger than it did, it was surprising actually. I think the lugs are fairly short as well, they did not stick out from the wrist which I hate. I have a 6.5 inch wrist.
WatchNutcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 February 2020, 02:25 PM   #4
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
They definitely don't wear the same. It's not night and day, but a noticeable difference. I have a 7" wrist and both watches are very comfortable, but the 16710 is almost like second skin. You don't even know the watch is on your wrist.

I wear both my 126710 and 16710 on jubilee and I think it's probably the most comfortable bracelet.

Except, that in the winter I can't quite get the perfect fit on my Super jubilee (for the 16710) and since there's no micro adjustments there's not much I can do but wait till summer to throw it back on. When it fits right though, it's really comfy.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2020, 02:44 AM   #5
Mr DateJust
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Glasgow, UK
Watch: 16570
Posts: 909
The 16710 wears better IMHO. It’s smaller and lighter. Yes the bracelet isn’t a “solid” but I find the old bracelets and especially clasps more comfortable. If you have a 16710 I wouldn’t bother with the new one. Just my take though.
Mr DateJust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2020, 02:59 AM   #6
air_king
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: US
Posts: 383
It does wear slightly larger but really not all that noticeable after an hour or two on the wrist. Not an issue as far as I’m concerned.
air_king is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2020, 03:05 AM   #7
Dsmith1974
"TRF" Member
 
Dsmith1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: Duncan
Location: London
Watch: DD 40
Posts: 2,263
To a great extent whatever you wear you’ll get used to, but as an owner of both I’d have to say the 16710 is a perfect daily. The 116710 is nice for a weekend or so but a much to wear all the time, and that’s more of a visual thing, it’s pretty comfy, but still not as comfy as a 16710 on Jubilee.
Dsmith1974 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2020, 03:47 AM   #8
zen123
"TRF" Member
 
zen123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 396
I have both versions. The six digit definitely wears bigger, most noticeable is that it is taller. I much prefer the 5 digit as I find it more comfortable to wear over extended time and cosmetically it looks better proportioned.
zen123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2020, 05:58 AM   #9
Crazy Lugs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 855
126710 definitely wears larger. The 16710 just feels right in nearly any situation. A true classic!
Crazy Lugs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2020, 06:01 AM   #10
cerendigit
"TRF" Member
 
cerendigit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Seattle
Watch: f91w
Posts: 1,078
It is a common misconception to think that the only difference is the size of the lugs (since both 5 digits and 6 digits are "40mm").

For me the biggest difference is the build quality, especially the bracelet and clap. That's what makes me think 6digits are far superior to 5 digits.

Yes the maxi-cases make the watch look bigger, but honestly that's minor compared to the over build quality of the watch.
cerendigit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2020, 06:06 AM   #11
seasubmariner
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by wappinghigh View Post
For those people who have both, could they kindly tell me if the current GMT wears exactly the same as the older 16710?

In partic if the Jubilee bracelet makes it wear a bit smaller...?

I've had a 16710 with the old rattly oyster bracelet on my wrist and it wears great on my puney little wrists, but I simply have never actually seen a current GMT.. let alone had the chance to put one on.

They are simply unicorns here. They aren't even available as demos...And if one shows up on a local grey dealers website (who actually has a bricks and mortar store).. they are gone before you get a chance to go in and check em out..

Would appreciate the help. The new Pepsi on a jubilee looks a mighty fine watch!

W
The new pepsi on a jubilee watch case thickness is somewhere between the super case GMT II and the old version 16710.

Please search for BATMAN AND BATGIRL. You will see the differences.

Jubilee is used to emphasize the differences which will turn to a new Oyster bracelet soon and it will be fully brushed.

Thinner lugs make it feel a bit smaller, and not the jubilee bracelet.

However, the first fixed link of the jubilee bracelet is noticably smaller than the Oyster one. So fitting an oyster bracelet on a batgirl or pepsi wont work. There will be a improper look between the fixed link and lugs as it wont fit right which also shows that the case is a bit thinner.
seasubmariner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2020, 06:18 AM   #12
mario1971
"TRF" Member
 
mario1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: Mariusz
Location: Poland, EU
Watch: Rolex/ALS/Chopard
Posts: 2,653
The older GMT II 16710 is a very comfortable watch. It lies like sticky, very comfortable. I only wore it on an oyster, but it seems to be just as good on Jubilee. It is perfectly proportional. The newer 116710 is better finished, it has a more massive bracelet and easylink. It has a thicker envelope, wider ears, and after many hours you can feel it on your hand. I didn't have the pleasure to hold the latest version on Jubilee :(
__________________
This is my opinion and I fully support it
mario1971 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2020, 09:30 PM   #13
DGB
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: uk
Posts: 992
Quote:
Originally Posted by mario1971 View Post
The older GMT II 16710 is a very comfortable watch. It lies like sticky, very comfortable. I only wore it on an oyster, but it seems to be just as good on Jubilee. It is perfectly proportional. The newer 116710 is better finished, it has a more massive bracelet and easylink. It has a thicker envelope, wider ears, and after many hours you can feel it on your hand. I didn't have the pleasure to hold the latest version on Jubilee :(


Beautiful watches both of them.
My heart goes to the older one though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2020, 08:58 PM   #14
wappinghigh
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Australia
Watch: 14270 14060
Posts: 318
that was great thanks to everyone! W
wappinghigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2020, 09:33 PM   #15
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,668
I won't wear the larger cased watches; they don't look or feel right on me with my 6.5in wrist. Many will at that size but I've drawn the line. That leaves me to Daytonas, OPs, Milgausses, DD, DJs, and of course five digit models.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2020, 10:52 PM   #16
sillo
"TRF" Member
 
sillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Sean
Location: NY
Watch: 5 Digit
Posts: 2,840
__________________
14060 | 16570 | 16600 | 16700 | 16800 | 79260

@TheGMTHand
sillo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.