|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
13 March 2024, 03:49 AM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: at home
Posts: 1,330
|
-15/+25
Seiko Alpinist spb159j -15/+25 per day with sweet price about $450, what do you think, go or not go?
|
|
|
|
13 March 2024, 09:22 PM
|
#2 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,623
|
Great watch. Go for it.
|
|
|
|
|
13 March 2024, 11:01 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Texas
Posts: 716
|
Great watch. And Seiko is often significantly better on accuracy than advertised.
|
|
|
|
|
14 March 2024, 04:26 PM
|
#4 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: at home
Posts: 1,330
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 March 2024, 11:11 PM
|
#5 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,844
|
It’s a beauty, paging @Cru Jones
|
|
|
|
|
30 March 2024, 05:09 AM
|
#6 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Real Name: Matthew
Location: Tulsa, OK, USA
Posts: 1,948
|
If accurate timekeeping were one of my primary considerations, I personally would avoid the modern 6Rs. I am by no means anal about timekeeping but I previously owned a watch with the 6R35 in it that I purchased new from an AD and it was so far out of spec I had them send it to Seiko for service. OTOH I owned a different watch with the 6R15 and it was consistently well within spec. These are obviously just two examples. However as I said if timekeeping to a spec is a motivator for you, I’d probably look elsewhere.
__________________
|Rolex Submariner 114060| |Rolex Datejust 126234 silver| |Grand Seiko SBGT021 day-date quartz| |
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Hybrid Mode
