The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 12 November 2024, 02:35 AM   #1
Il-Re
"TRF" Member
 
Il-Re's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: London
Watch: Rolex GMT2
Posts: 56
AP Royal Oak 56023ST - Quartz no good?

Hi all, was just wondering if anyone had any experience or knowledge of this model (56023ST) which has the AP 2506 caliber. I found the below on another thread and seen things on youtube, but other than that I cannot find much more information. Is this a watch to steer clear of? My main concern as I have seen on youtube comments is if something happens to the circuit board the watch is then essentially ruined? are older quartz watches not repairable? in this day and age it seems hard to imagine something as simple as a 3 hand quartz cannot be repaired. I also noticed on the specific model I was looking at the dial has a tropical patina coming on, should I expect this continue throughout the dial?
Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg rodial.JPG (36.6 KB, 179 views)
__________________
AP Royal Oak 15202ST - AP Royal Oak Offshore 25721ST - Patek Philippe 5120J - Vacheron Constantin 43039 - Rolex GMT Master 2 - Rolex DJ36 - Breguet Type XXI
Jaeger LeCoultre Reverso Duo - Cartier Tank Large
Il-Re is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2024, 04:30 PM   #2
Steele
"TRF" Member
 
Steele's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Location: Florida
Watch: All of them
Posts: 771
Good question the wifey has and older quartz model and I’m interested in what someone with some experience will have to say
Steele is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2024, 08:45 PM   #3
Il-Re
"TRF" Member
 
Il-Re's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: London
Watch: Rolex GMT2
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steele View Post
Good question the wifey has and older quartz model and I’m interested in what someone with some experience will have to say
My wife nearly bought an older quartz royal oak herself, the deal didn't work out, but my idea was quartz would be easy for her to maintain (she doesn't care about movements as such). Clearly this is not the case.
__________________
AP Royal Oak 15202ST - AP Royal Oak Offshore 25721ST - Patek Philippe 5120J - Vacheron Constantin 43039 - Rolex GMT Master 2 - Rolex DJ36 - Breguet Type XXI
Jaeger LeCoultre Reverso Duo - Cartier Tank Large
Il-Re is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2024, 05:14 PM   #4
lucasalce
"TRF" Member
 
lucasalce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: The world
Posts: 143
There is a point on this on the sticky thread. See point 10 https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=219760
lucasalce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 November 2024, 08:44 PM   #5
Il-Re
"TRF" Member
 
Il-Re's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: London
Watch: Rolex GMT2
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucasalce View Post
There is a point on this on the sticky thread. See point 10 https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=219760
I did see this, and did wonder if that point was absolute and I should just take that at face value and follow the advice.....wondered if there were any other opinions to the contrary. Doing an expensive service every 3 years would be annoying over time I can imagine.
__________________
AP Royal Oak 15202ST - AP Royal Oak Offshore 25721ST - Patek Philippe 5120J - Vacheron Constantin 43039 - Rolex GMT Master 2 - Rolex DJ36 - Breguet Type XXI
Jaeger LeCoultre Reverso Duo - Cartier Tank Large
Il-Re is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 November 2024, 01:15 AM   #6
Tomas Eriksson
"TRF" Member
 
Tomas Eriksson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 2,027
The 56023ST has removable case back, battery change is almost as easy as on a a cartier tank (just eight screws instead of four)
__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other…
Tomas Eriksson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2024, 10:14 AM   #7
piratfisk
"TRF" Member
 
piratfisk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Real Name: Jake
Location: Slam Diego
Watch: 16233, 116619LB
Posts: 2,289
As a non-AP owner & sometimes poo-poo'er on quartz watches, I would not spend money on this.

If you were thinking to spend less on an older APRO quartz because APROs are very in vogue now, I would not. I'd wait 'til I could get a mechanical one, made by a brand known for their designs & mechanical movements. If, on the flip side, you want a quartz watch, get the CasiOak. The headache of dealing with an arguably very finnicky battery replacement process turns me off immediately.
__________________
What's the time? It's time to get ill.

Wishlist: 128236; 16202BC; 5396G
piratfisk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.