ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
28 January 2010, 01:05 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Wade
Location: TN
Watch: 116619
Posts: 2,659
|
Removing cyclops
I am thinking of removing the magnifier from the date window on my GMT. Can anyone tell me if this will leave any tell tail signs on the crystal? I am concerned about seeing an outline from where it was. I am also quite concerned about the operation itself
|
28 January 2010, 01:18 PM | #2 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
Quote:
And there was no unsightly residue: Fr. John† |
|
28 January 2010, 01:21 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
Looks good Fr. John.
|
28 January 2010, 01:37 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
Cool!
|
28 January 2010, 01:40 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Pav
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 11,495
|
The no cyclops look is superb.....
|
28 January 2010, 01:40 PM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: New Haven, CT
Watch: 116610 Sub-C
Posts: 6,552
|
I wouldn't suggest taking a chissel to the crystal. I'd order a new slick one to fit it. That has nothing good to come from it. Simply get a new part!
|
28 January 2010, 01:42 PM | #7 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rik Dietel
Location: Seminole Fla
Watch: 5512 s/s Sub
Posts: 1,818
|
The other way is to take it off the watch remove gasket put it on a charcoal heating block and torch it up once the cyclop gets red hot it will pop off,takes about 10 seconds. let it cool down use a straight razor to remove any remaining glue. Then reinstall I do it all the time. Now if you have an aftermaket crystal it might fracture but a real one won't I have done hundreds of them. Rikki
|
28 January 2010, 01:51 PM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Sydney
Watch: 118239
Posts: 413
|
Quote:
__________________
The world is safe again... but for how long? Current: TAG Heuer 2000 Classic, Kobold Phantom Tactical Chronograph, Rolex Submariner 16610, Breitling Superocean Heritage Chronograph A13320 (Crowe Edition), Rolex Day-Date 118239 |
|
28 January 2010, 02:28 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Wade
Location: TN
Watch: 116619
Posts: 2,659
|
Rik,
Thanks for the suggestion, that is a little outside my realm.....anything having to do with torch, red hot, and things of the like will not be associated with any of my watches, at least from my hands. |
28 January 2010, 02:40 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3,185
|
Torches and chisels don't appeal to me and my method was painless.
The total cost was <$180; the best money I ever spent. The dial is more symmetrical and the date is legible from more angles. No more Rolex salute. Fr. John† |
28 January 2010, 03:08 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Arizona, USA.
Watch: Your Six...!!!....
Posts: 207
|
Wade,
Here's a picture of my Sub date with no Cyclops... I removed mine with placing the tip of my soldering gun on Cyclopes for 10 second intervals and tried to dislodge the Cyclopes with a heavy duty plastic knife...it only took less than five minutes and the Cyclopes eventually came right off...If you do this, just make sure that you have a "mineral Crystal" not an acrylic one... Without Cyclopes, my sub looks as good as the no date but with needed date..!!! ...best of the both wolds in one.... |
28 January 2010, 04:23 PM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
|
Here is how it looks when I try that on one of my DateJust´s.
I start with my cyclop remover kit. Pull it up in my full size Bergeon case holder. And start thr work. Damn, Rolex have quality glue so I have to warm it up a bit. Now I hope it will come off. Ouups, not so good. What do you think, did I have to change crystal? Or can it be polished? Jocke
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish. What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom? Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute. |
28 January 2010, 02:35 PM | #13 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
|
Fr. John
You inspired me for my white Exp II BUT I went to my watchmaker and said that was just too much drama (as I insisted on keeping the original crystal as well) so he just installed a Daytona service crystal :) Did not know they were the same size but works perfect, passed all pressure tests and all.... I do not know if it would work on other models but something to consider.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun |
28 January 2010, 04:32 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: John
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 223
|
Why not just buy Rolex without a cyclops from the get go? SD, Daytona, Milgauss...you have so many choices???
|
29 January 2010, 12:04 AM | #15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Wade
Location: TN
Watch: 116619
Posts: 2,659
|
Well, for two reasons #1 the get go is gone, I have a cyclops (actually two). #2 I obviously don't care for the watch styles without the cyclops, as I spent thousands on other styles watches.
|
28 January 2010, 10:32 PM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: TX
Watch: Rolex Yacht-Master
Posts: 149
|
Jocke...that's great!! Good job...it will just buff right out i think!
|
29 January 2010, 12:12 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: New Haven, CT
Watch: 116610 Sub-C
Posts: 6,552
|
Jocke, Everything seems to be going just fine here. The crystal will need a light polish at the end, but don't stop just yet. There seems to be a bit of the cyclops on the crystal. The next step is to carefully drill the discolored area out. You can figure out the bit needed by the size of your crystal. Once you remove the excess fill the low area with a bonding compound. You'll be admiring it tonight at dinner!
|
29 January 2010, 12:16 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Frédéric
Location: Belgium
Posts: 38
|
Great job, jocke! Are you working on plastic surgery?
|
29 January 2010, 12:17 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Manchester, M16
Watch: SS GMT-IIc
Posts: 106
|
Hi
Not sure which model GMT you refer to, but I'd be careful with the GMT IIc: From what I understand (but I have been known to be wrong....! ) there is an antireflective coating underneath the cyclops on the new models, on the inside of the crystal. The coating is the same shape as the cyclops. So, when the cyclops is removed, its "footprint" (for want of a better word) remains, and might look a bit odd/ugly to some... I found a picture of this on the web somewhere sometime ago when I was thinking of removing the cyclops on my GMT IIc. I'll try and find it again. |
29 January 2010, 12:24 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Manchester, M16
Watch: SS GMT-IIc
Posts: 106
|
check here:
http://www.minus4plus6.com/116710.htm and here: http://www.minus4plus6.com/images/11...MTmaster06.jpg |
29 January 2010, 12:41 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
Jocke I never get tired of that thread of yours.
:r ofl: |
29 January 2010, 12:42 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
Charles N, a member here and moderator over at TZ, removed the cylops from both his Datejust and platinum Day-Date using a small, sharp blade and a tap from a small hammer. Popped right off. They ended up looking like his pix below.
I think he eventually decided he didn't like the look, and had the crystals replaced. Here are a couple of other related threads: http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...ight=Charles+N http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...ight=Charles+N
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
29 January 2010, 12:51 AM | #23 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
Quote:
|
|
29 January 2010, 12:56 AM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
|
Having no cyclops will increase clearance for desk diving!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.