ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
22 February 2010, 12:31 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
Timed my Explorer:
7 seconds fast a day, but hey I'm ok with that.
|
22 February 2010, 12:33 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Caleb
Location: California
Watch: Rolex 1500
Posts: 1,295
|
|
22 February 2010, 12:34 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
|
22 February 2010, 12:36 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Caleb
Location: California
Watch: Rolex 1500
Posts: 1,295
|
|
22 February 2010, 12:45 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
|
22 February 2010, 12:38 PM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 2,130
|
My AD recommends overhaul if it is more than 5 +/- per day...My Daytona is +3 and my Sub is +2 at the moment as per his testing.
__________________
Rest in peace JJ! http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...light=JJ+irani "Rolex is highly addictive. Please shop responsibly" |
24 February 2010, 12:30 PM | #7 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,449
|
|
24 February 2010, 12:46 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: David Walz
Location: San Diego CA USA
Watch: my hand. :)
Posts: 9,156
|
Kyle put your mug back on you avatar I am getting confused here.
|
24 February 2010, 12:59 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
|
24 February 2010, 01:06 PM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
|
Hah! My EX1 runs at +1.2 secs a day!
And I wear mine landscaping! |
24 February 2010, 02:49 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Midwest-USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,942
|
|
24 February 2010, 06:44 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: portland
Watch: GMT MASTER
Posts: 51
|
if a watch isn't fully wound will it usually run fast or slow?
|
28 February 2010, 02:00 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Europe
Posts: 603
|
|
1 March 2010, 07:37 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: LV, 1949 Everest
Posts: 464
|
|
22 February 2010, 03:14 PM | #15 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 650
|
+7 seconds on a single day does not necessarily mean it is outside of specifications.
Quote:
Source Measure it over a period of several days. When a watch is COSC certified it goes through testing being tested at several different positions. I would recommend wearing the watch (so it is in different positions) for several days and determining any variance based on the average gain or loss over several days. |
|
24 February 2010, 01:13 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Al
Location: GMT+6
Watch: GMT - BLNR
Posts: 315
|
Quote:
__________________
"Rythm, tempo, harmony, measuring & movement" |
|
24 February 2010, 01:39 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 650
|
Interesting, this is my understanding: In order for a mechanical watch to be granted Chronometer status a watch much meet the following criteria an average daily gain of not more than 4 seconds and a loss of not more than 6 seconds per day for the first ten days of testing (+4/-6 seconds per day).
So, is passing determined on a daily basis meaning that on no day should go past +4/-6 or +4/-6 per day over 10 days so that +40 seconds/-60 seconds after the entire test is acceptable. ... after all if you have your watch lying on its back it will run a bit slower, and if you have it lying on its face a bit faster so the results for a single day would not appear to be that definitive. |
27 February 2010, 12:06 PM | #18 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Todd
Location: US
Posts: 3,528
|
Kyle, set your watch with the crown UP at night and see what happens.
|
27 February 2010, 12:12 PM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: G
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 6,042
|
|
27 February 2010, 12:15 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
|
27 February 2010, 12:08 PM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: G
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 6,042
|
My DJ was at +2!
|
27 February 2010, 12:17 PM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
and you're going to "mature" or grow old faster
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
27 February 2010, 02:07 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Carl
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Watch: Rolex Explorer 1
Posts: 1,780
|
Not only do I love my Explorer ( as you already know, sorry if I am getting to sound boring ), but it is the most accurate watch I have ever owned. I don't usually keep a precise check on the time a watch of mine gains or loses. However, just over a week ago I did the whole sych thing with my computer's clock, starting with the second hand a 12 o'clock etc. I have checked the last couple of days, and the watch is running almost exactly 5 seconds slow, so that is less than a second per day, which I think is pretty darn good. Just another reason to like this watch even more. It is more accurate than my Milgauss, although in defence of the Milgauss, it does not get nearly as much wrist time.
Cheers , Carl
__________________
Those who possess a sense of entitlement are seldom satisfied. |
27 February 2010, 02:10 PM | #24 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Take off the crystal and delete those famous words.....
SUPERLATIVE CHRONOMETER OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
27 February 2010, 02:11 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
|
27 February 2010, 02:12 PM | #26 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
Ask Jocke for some help.......he's always got his blow-torch ready!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
28 February 2010, 12:52 AM | #27 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Todd
Location: US
Posts: 3,528
|
Any updates Kyle? Just curious as that way works for me pretty well.
|
28 February 2010, 02:02 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
So I found out while placed like this:
It gained 7 seconds. I will try crown up. |
28 February 2010, 02:23 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: London
Posts: 2,081
|
Interesting fluctuations. My Explorer is 30 years old, has a movement designed 60 years ago, is not COSC certified and loses 1 second every 3 days.....which i'm happy with
|
1 March 2010, 05:59 AM | #30 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Todd
Location: US
Posts: 3,528
|
Kyle, what about crown up? Did it slow her down? Just looking for a follow up.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.