The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10 August 2010, 03:05 PM   #1
ParisDakarBmw
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: New Haven, CT
Watch: 116610 Sub-C
Posts: 6,552
Rumor from AD

Yet again there is another "scoop" the AD shared with me today.

I was told that Rolex would be scaling back the production of stainless steel models, and producing more out of precious metal.

They explained that the SS models didn't fetch the desired prices, and the gold models would be more sought after.

I looked around at the inventory, and had a confused look on my face.

There are so many new models for every taste, and budget.

The smaller ladies models in stainless were made with many variations.

The turnograph, date just, explorer, submariner c, DSSD, and the list goes on. Those are only a few years from their Basel release. Why would they chop those from the line up?

I looked at every watch in the store again, and noticed plenty of rose gold models, white gold models, and also platinum. Stainless steel was surely a money maker compaired to the production cost. No precious metal keeps the cost low, while the prices increase on the sticker.

I didn't really know what to make of the comment, but hope Rolex doesn't abandon stainless steel any time soon.
ParisDakarBmw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 03:10 PM   #2
JUSTROLEXES
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller
 
JUSTROLEXES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tony Geha
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 51,001
Paul the SS Sports models sell faster and are cheaper so that is why you don't find many left...they are the bread and butter of the line...
Also the ADs place an order from Rolex and they will not know what they're getting up until it's on it's way... One more thing to keep in mind, Rolex was down for about 3 weeks for the summer vacation... and at that time ADs don't get much of new watches.
__________________
Instagram @JustRolexes
2FA security active
JUSTROLEXES is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 03:13 PM   #3
ParisDakarBmw
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: New Haven, CT
Watch: 116610 Sub-C
Posts: 6,552
Making my new SUB C into a "Smurf"

meant to start a new thread.
ParisDakarBmw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 03:14 PM   #4
Joey_V
"TRF" Member
 
Joey_V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Joey
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: SS Sub 16610 M
Posts: 3,824
There's no way they'd quit making SS models as their big earner. They would alienate themselves from their buying demographic and price themselves out of public's reach.

SS is here to stay IMO.
__________________

Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015
Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L
Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD
Joey_V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2010, 08:28 AM   #5
FremStar
"TRF" Member
 
FremStar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Sam
Location: Gotham City
Watch: Wall Street
Posts: 9,954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joey_V View Post
There's no way they'd quit making SS models as their big earner. They would alienate themselves from their buying demographic and price themselves out of public's reach.

SS is here to stay IMO.
You would be very surprised on how many people own GOLD, Platinum, and/or Diamond Rolex pieces and I am not refrencing "celebrities"
FremStar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 03:19 PM   #6
fly4food84
2024 Pledge Member
 
fly4food84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: MS
Watch: I like Rolexes
Posts: 359
If this were true my next watch would not be a Rolex as I do not like gold watches or even TT for that matter. SS simply can not go anywhere!
fly4food84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 09:27 PM   #7
beany
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: uk
Watch: 14060
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by fly4food84 View Post
If this were true my next watch would not be a Rolex as I do not like gold watches or even TT for that matter. SS simply can not go anywhere!
Same for me SS all the way.
beany is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 09:43 PM   #8
buke45
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Juan
Location: Ponce, PR
Watch: Your Butt
Posts: 1,464
Icon12

WOW!! I agree with all of you but do you think the AD could be wrong. They are usually always right but hey maybe they will be wrong for the first time. LOL
buke45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 09:22 PM   #9
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
Makes no sense whatsoever. In the middle of a recession worldwide.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 10:17 PM   #10
CoopJr
"TRF" Member
 
CoopJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Coop
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: Subs
Posts: 6,455
I'm calling AD

No way Rolex drops back on SS.
CoopJr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2010, 01:53 AM   #11
marcinthemiddle
Vacated
 
marcinthemiddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Marc
Location: Connecticut
Watch: PAM 111 'N'
Posts: 2,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoopJr View Post
I'm calling AD

No way Rolex drops back on SS.
I agree. That would be C-R-A-Z-Y...
__________________
NAWCC Member
Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

Executive Dorklehead
marcinthemiddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 10:20 PM   #12
Ebruner
"TRF" Member
 
Ebruner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 118208
Posts: 2,510
I doubt this will happen, but there is more margin in the Gold and Plat models than in the SS.

-Eddie
__________________
Ebruner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 10:23 PM   #13
Watch Professor
"TRF" Member
 
Watch Professor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Myron
Location: New York
Watch: GMT IIC; Sub Date
Posts: 3,166
AD's seem to be the last to know. I doubt this very much.
Watch Professor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 10:25 PM   #14
rpryan55
"TRF" Member
 
rpryan55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
Paul, in my experience ADs say some of the stupidest things on the planet. Rolex will never scale back the SS models - they are the heart of the economic engine that is that corporation's business.
__________________
“The only reason for time .......................
is so that everything doesn't happen at once."
Albert Einstein
rpryan55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 10:31 PM   #15
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParisDakarBmw View Post
Yet again there is another "scoop" the AD shared with me today.

I was told that Rolex would be scaling back the production of stainless steel models, and producing more out of precious metal.

They explained that the SS models didn't fetch the desired prices, and the gold models would be more sought after.

I looked around at the inventory, and had a confused look on my face.

There are so many new models for every taste, and budget.

The smaller ladies models in stainless were made with many variations.

The turnograph, date just, explorer, submariner c, DSSD, and the list goes on. Those are only a few years from their Basel release. Why would they chop those from the line up?

I looked at every watch in the store again, and noticed plenty of rose gold models, white gold models, and also platinum. Stainless steel was surely a money maker compaired to the production cost. No precious metal keeps the cost low, while the prices increase on the sticker.

I didn't really know what to make of the comment, but hope Rolex doesn't abandon stainless steel any time soon.
IMHO another case of a AD talking though where the sun don't shine.While all gold and precious metal watches have a huge mark up and huge profit for Rolex thats for sure.Its the S.Steel models that are Rolex bread and butter and have been for the past 50 odd years.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 10:42 PM   #16
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
ADs have a very very very poor record of talking sense with regard to these matters.

I can see them trimming the AD network but not cutting back SS models.

All they ever need to do is up the SS prices closer to the TT models and make the extra money that way.

It's a dangerous game they are playing, even now. Rolex is a strong strong brand but there will come a time when the brand suffers due to such obvious poor value for what you actually get.
__________________
..33
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 10:59 PM   #17
Hansch99
"TRF" Member
 
Hansch99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 14060M, 116200
Posts: 318
ADs in my area always seem to be the first to know bad rumors and the last to know what's really going on.
Hansch99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 11:16 PM   #18
Watcheroo
2024 Pledge Member
 
Watcheroo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,926
Your AD employee has no idea what he/she is talking about. Why would any company shoot themselves in the foot?
Watcheroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 11:28 PM   #19
Numismatist
"TRF" Member
 
Numismatist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
The alternative viewpoint is that Eddie is right, the markup on precious metal watches is enormous. If they bring the SS prices closer to precious prices, it may tempt more people to go all in and buy the precious. Also, if there truly is a cut-back in the SS production, those prices will rise and perpetuate the first sentence.

I agree, ADs are full of usually; however, there is a strong argument for this to actually happen. Remember, Rolex has been increasing prices EVEN in and during the economic crash.

I'm not saying I like it, but it wouldn't surprise me.
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB
Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP
Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP
Numismatist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 11:35 PM   #20
TheDude
"TRF" Member
 
TheDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
Quote:
Originally Posted by Numismatist View Post
The alternative viewpoint is that Eddie is right, the markup on precious metal watches is enormous. If they bring the SS prices closer to precious prices, it may tempt more people to go all in and buy the precious. Also, if there truly is a cut-back in the SS production, those prices will rise and perpetuate the first sentence.

I agree, ADs are full of usually; however, there is a strong argument for this to actually happen. Remember, Rolex has been increasing prices EVEN in and during the economic crash.

I'm not saying I like it, but it wouldn't surprise me.
There is nearly price parity now. Where I live, the ADs won't discount SS at all, but will do so for TT and Solid Gold/Plat. At least for TT, the actual price can come -VERY- close to the cost of an MSRP SS version of the same watch.
TheDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 11:45 PM   #21
Numismatist
"TRF" Member
 
Numismatist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDude View Post
There is nearly price parity now. Where I live, the ADs won't discount SS at all, but will do so for TT and Solid Gold/Plat. At least for TT, the actual price can come -VERY- close to the cost of an MSRP SS version of the same watch.
Sure! The majority of their customers are NOT WISs like us, they're the uninformed impulse buyers that buy what looks pretty to them. This makes buying gold a better 'feeling' than SS for them. Also (and I suppose a more minor reason) is that Rolex probably bought lots of gold in the $700-$900 range, but can now price it at the $1100 - $1300 range in their watches. A small, but nice paper profit. Can't really do that with SS watches.
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB
Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP
Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP
Numismatist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 August 2010, 11:59 PM   #22
Maxseven
"TRF" Member
 
Maxseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 467
I think AD's sometimes make things up, just to spur buying interest. The psychology in this case, may be that you were looking at a SS model, and the AD cooked up a story to get you to pull the trigger (i.e. Rolex is going to run out of SS models and the prices are going to go sky-high, so you better get one while you can!)
__________________
Hooper: Watch it! Damn it, Martin! This is compressed air! Martin: Well what the hell kind of a knot was that! Hooper: You pulled the wrong one! You screw around with these tanks and they're going to blow up!

Maxseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2010, 12:16 AM   #23
nowzen
"TRF" Member
 
nowzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 741
I really don't see how a steel subs can be described as 'bread & butter' when you have to sell 10 of them to make the same bucks as one a precious metal jewel-encrusted blingfest.

The economy argument is also specious as its not affecting the high end like its affecting main street. In the end, any big corporation will make these decisions based how how it affects the bottom line and not its popularity amongst a small market share.

I was recently in Macau cruising the many pawn shops looking at preowned Rolexes. Hard to find any steel subs amongst all the glitzy golds and diamonds. Look at ebay and the number of steel subs compared to the flash. I hope the AD is wrong, but I wouldn't be surprised at all.
nowzen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2010, 12:20 AM   #24
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,465
Your dealer is on crack... With the current economy, most people are looking to camouflage their money and the subdued SS models are more popular than ever . Its o.k if your successful as long as you dont look like you are.
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2010, 01:00 AM   #25
Maxseven
"TRF" Member
 
Maxseven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
... With the current economy, most people are looking to camouflage their money ...
That's interesting. Why would people want to hide their money? Are they ashamed of their success or is it more that they feel guilty because it is perceived that many others are suffering? If so, would it not be better to inspire others to endeavor success by not pretending to be austere or frugal? After all, material possession and consumption is probably the single largest driver of economies.

Just a thought -
__________________
Hooper: Watch it! Damn it, Martin! This is compressed air! Martin: Well what the hell kind of a knot was that! Hooper: You pulled the wrong one! You screw around with these tanks and they're going to blow up!

Maxseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2010, 01:12 AM   #26
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,465
I totally agree with you. I wear my Serti Sub with great pride and respect. There is bizarre movement that many feel any show of wealth is unfashionable. God forbid I make a profit in todays economy. I guess I am a capitalist tool.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxseven View Post
That's interesting. Why would people want to hide their money? Are they ashamed of their success or is it more that they feel guilty because it is perceived that many others are suffering? If so, would it not be better to inspire others to endeavor success by not pretending to be austere or frugal? After all, material possession and consumption is probably the single largest driver of economies.

Just a thought -
Mystro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2010, 12:27 AM   #27
Puffy
"TRF" Member
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
My AD said I could mow his lawn and get a free SS, model of my choice

They're so full of shite
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2010, 01:05 AM   #28
fc3s2k
"TRF" Member
 
fc3s2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Barry
Location: california
Watch: OFFICINE PANERAI
Posts: 1,289
Oh and Toyota is cutting back on the camry as well!!!!!!
fc3s2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2010, 01:18 AM   #29
ParisDakarBmw
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Paul
Location: New Haven, CT
Watch: 116610 Sub-C
Posts: 6,552
I smelled BS when the comment was made, but then looked at the inventory.

There was plenty of gold in the showcase.

The flip side was all of the new stainless steel models could be reduced in theory to force a gold model purchase if you wanted one new.

I doubt it, but it is marketing
ParisDakarBmw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 August 2010, 01:56 AM   #30
marcinthemiddle
Vacated
 
marcinthemiddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Marc
Location: Connecticut
Watch: PAM 111 'N'
Posts: 2,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by ParisDakarBmw View Post
I smelled BS when the comment was made, but then looked at the inventory.

There was plenty of gold in the showcase.

The flip side was all of the new stainless steel models could be reduced in theory to force a gold model purchase if you wanted one new.

I doubt it, but it is marketing
If you've got 100 Rolexes in stock- 5 gold and 5 ss....at the end of the week what do you think you'll be left with more quantity of? Better yet, What's the chance of the average person coming in to purchase...I dunno, a $29,000 gold sub or a $6,000 one? Just sayin'...
__________________
NAWCC Member
Card Carrying Member of the Global Assoc. of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

Executive Dorklehead
marcinthemiddle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.