The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Panerai Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 September 2010, 08:52 PM   #1
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
getting the Panerai itch again - which GMT?

you know the feeling.... while im still very keen on a 210, something about the Luminor GMT has caught my eyes

done a quick research and there are a few variants of Luminor GMTs i can find -

PAM088 - strap (MSRP £4.4K)
PAM160 - steel bracelet (£4K)
PAM161 - steel case, titanium bracelet (£5.9)
PAM244 - different dial design to 88? (£4.3k)
PAM297 - steel case, titanium& steel bracelet (£5k)

so, my question is.... which one is "more popular" and in turn will "retain" more value in the future?

im thinking of getting a PAM160 instead of the PAM088 (but i do preefer the 88 dial design though), so i have a Panerai bracelet (it is so damn expensive to buy seperately), and i can change to straps to mix it up.

another thing with the 160 is that the pre-owned price seems to be higher than the pre-owned price of the 88 (according to the website im ckecking atm).. is that the real case?


then again... there is a PAM355 (sexy piece though, but no idea what the £ is... i have a feeling it is more than any of the ones above)



what are you opinions and suggestions, thanks?
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2010, 09:42 PM   #2
leeye
"TRF" Member
 
leeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Lee
Location: Singapore
Watch: Too many......
Posts: 689
may i recommend the 2010 Special Edition PAM0029 Luminor GMT

the center sweeping second hand is rather unique.
__________________
Lee, Singapore - Shanghai
Submersibles - PAM 64, 87, 187, 243, 382
Luminor - PAM 366, 367, 372, 390, 420
Radiomir - PAM 410
leeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2010, 09:55 PM   #3
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by leeye View Post
may i recommend the 2010 Special Edition PAM0029 Luminor GMT

the center sweeping second hand is rather unique.
thanks Lee... just had a quick look at Panerai website.

is it me or does it look like an EXPII on leather strap?

i think i still prefer the non-special edition versions



(why, and i mean why do they put a cyclops over the date window.. )
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2010, 08:38 PM   #4
rolexcd
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Anthony
Location: China / Australia
Watch: Daytona SS Black D
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by leeye View Post
may i recommend the 2010 Special Edition PAM0029 Luminor GMT

the center sweeping second hand is rather unique.
I agree and believe that this piece will be able to hold its value really well.

The previous model of 029, I believe is 023. The original 023 was sold at less than HKD20,000, Nowadays, you will be lucky to get one with good condition at HKD50,000. If it is a full set, price will be much higher.
rolexcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2010, 10:56 PM   #5
timepieceaddict
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Nick
Location: Sussex, UK
Watch: 116520, Pam 312
Posts: 286
Theres also the 320.
1950's case, sandwich dial, new in house automatic movement.
Think rrp is £5000.
I like the Pam 29 a lot.
timepieceaddict is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2010, 11:10 PM   #6
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by timepieceaddict View Post
Theres also the 320.
1950's case, sandwich dial, new in house automatic movement.
Think rrp is £5000.
I like the Pam 29 a lot.
thanks Nick. yes, i forgot about the 320.
i like the simple design, but one issue i have with it is the non-24 hours GMT feature and no am/pm indicator.
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2010, 11:12 PM   #7
Shade
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Norman
Location: Jakarta
Watch: All of 'em..
Posts: 2,926
I would recommend any GMT with a 1950 case.. Its my personal preference.. However the Pam 088 is very popular amongst panerai fans.
Shade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 December 2010, 06:08 PM   #8
vincent_drlin
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Taiwan
Watch: PAM233,371,390,339
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by timepieceaddict View Post
Theres also the 320.
1950's case, sandwich dial, new in house automatic movement.
Think rrp is £5000.
I like the Pam 29 a lot.
I'll recommend u 320!
Second set function and rear power reserve with GMT hand, more than 312...

320 simple but functional!
vincent_drlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2010, 11:16 PM   #9
Mosco
"TRF" Member
 
Mosco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Greg
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: I like to...
Posts: 18,567
What about Pam 275, 233, 311? All GMT's with in-house 8-day movements.
__________________
Instagram - @CaliberSwiss

“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson
Mosco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2010, 11:21 PM   #10
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shade View Post
I would recommend any GMT with a 1950 case.. Its my personal preference.. However the Pam 088 is very popular amongst panerai fans.
thanks Norman.... im liking the 1950 case, as well as the 88

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosco View Post
What about Pam 275, 233, 311? All GMT's with in-house 8-day movements.
oh man... why so many

(typing www.panerai.com.......)
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 September 2010, 11:55 PM   #11
Mosco
"TRF" Member
 
Mosco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Greg
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: I like to...
Posts: 18,567
Beauty about those is that they're only GMT when they need to be, as the 2nd timezone hand can be hidden behind the main hour hand, thus cleaning up the dial. Oh, and the 289 too...
__________________
Instagram - @CaliberSwiss

“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson
Mosco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2010, 05:40 AM   #12
eng81157
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1
i have a 320. am absolutely loving despite that it lacks a am/pm indicator

honestly, u don't really need it to tell u the 2nd time zone. just the gmt hand will suffice
eng81157 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 November 2010, 05:59 PM   #13
vincent_drlin
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Taiwan
Watch: PAM233,371,390,339
Posts: 56
Quote:
Originally Posted by eng81157 View Post
i have a 320. am absolutely loving despite that it lacks a am/pm indicator

honestly, u don't really need it to tell u the 2nd time zone. just the gmt hand will suffice

But sometimes telling the 2nd time zone in am or pm is important,
especially when u are ready to call somebody there!
vincent_drlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2010, 05:51 AM   #14
Nahligah
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Alex
Location: Pattaya Thailand
Watch: not enough...
Posts: 244
88
Nahligah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2010, 10:31 AM   #15
blairtolar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 10
I love my 233....1950 case, domed crystal, quick release strap change, in house....
blairtolar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2010, 10:56 AM   #16
buz-lh
"TRF" Member
 
buz-lh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Buz
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Rolex Tudor Pam
Posts: 5,108
Love my big 88
__________________
Buz
The faster you move, the slower time passes, the longer you live. Peter Diamandis

buz-lh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2010, 02:21 PM   #17
MrJ320
"TRF" Member
 
MrJ320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: James
Location: Toronto
Watch: IG: @j.project
Posts: 2,194
I had the 320 but now have the 233. Love both of them and either would be a great choice. I didn't think the non-24h GMT on the 320 was a deal breaker, and like everyone said the 1950 case is amazing.

Ended up with the 233 though as I couldn't get away from the 8-day and superdome.

Good luck with your search!

Cheers,
James
MrJ320 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2010, 02:32 PM   #18
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
Eric...wow...you are on a roll buddy!

88 for me....
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2010, 08:00 PM   #19
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalip View Post
Eric...wow...you are on a roll buddy!

88 for me....
yeah... i will be rolling into a dog house soon mate


how's the 0ne-8-three going?
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 September 2010, 04:28 PM   #20
1watchaholic
"TRF" Member
 
1watchaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Gary
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex Sub Serti
Posts: 557
I have got to cast my vote for the PAM 88!
1watchaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2010, 06:41 AM   #21
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Stick to what you want. Get the GMT later....

__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2010, 07:04 AM   #22
DCgator
"TRF" Member
 
DCgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
Icon6

Pam 88
DCgator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2010, 07:12 AM   #23
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,682
No arguement from me about the 88. This one has been around the horn.



Speaking of Horn (as in Mike), if you can find one of these I'd go for it. Not a reference you see much (500) and has a unique history.



I'm with Lee on the 29--it will be mine.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2010, 08:38 AM   #24
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
Stick to what you want. Get the GMT later....
yeah, i get what you mean. as much as i would like a 210 now, i just can not get hold of one here. they are just not getting delivered soon enough.... and its kinda exciting to "bump into" a Panerai you like out of no where thats how i got my 000

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike View Post
No arguement from me about the 88. This one has been around the horn.
why am i not surprised to hear that Mike

as for the horn (500), it is nice, but i do prefer the 88 tbh
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 September 2010, 08:54 AM   #25
Dan Pierce
"TRF" Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,607
Don't own one but if I did it would be an 88.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2010, 01:13 AM   #26
Submarino
"TRF" Member
 
Submarino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
PAM 329 or PAM 321!
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER

Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle

Submarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2010, 01:25 AM   #27
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
thanks guys.

i thought PAM098 (discountiuned)/PAM355 was an interesting design. just not too sure about the 42mm case - is it as "popular" as the 40mm Luminors?
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2010, 01:39 AM   #28
L-16610
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 825
to be honest, I would NOT buy a GMT

Panerai is a brand where you only buy the simple models
2 or max 3 hands, NO COMPLICATIONS !
L-16610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2010, 02:57 AM   #29
Mosco
"TRF" Member
 
Mosco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Greg
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: I like to...
Posts: 18,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by L-16610 View Post
to be honest, I would NOT buy a GMT

Panerai is a brand where you only buy the simple models
2 or max 3 hands, NO COMPLICATIONS !
Ummmm.... No. No brand delivers complications as clean and elegant as Panerai.
__________________
Instagram - @CaliberSwiss

“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson
Mosco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2010, 05:05 AM   #30
L-16610
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosco View Post
Ummmm.... No. No brand delivers complications as clean and elegant as Panerai.
the 233 is indeed a great watch and it is a complication
L-16610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

Takuya Watches

DavidSW Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.