ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

tmac141 · 9 November 2010, 07:57 AM

I have had my Sub-C for almost a week and have noticed that it wears a lot like a SD 16600. I believe the weight of the new Sub-C is similar to the 16600. However the sub-c is not as thick as the 16600, but thicker than the old 16610. I am really enjoying the sub-c, what a great watch.

psv · 9 November 2010, 08:15 AM

The other way around-ish: the 16600 should have been updated with maxi hands and hour plots, perhaps the new bracelet system and we would all have been happy! :-)

STEELINOX · 9 November 2010, 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by psv

The other way around-ish: the 16600 should have been updated with maxi hands and hour plots, perhaps the new bracelet system and we would all have been happy! :-)

SaddleSC · 9 November 2010, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by psv

The other way around-ish: the 16600 should have been updated with maxi hands and hour plots, perhaps the new bracelet system and we would all have been happy! :-)

x1000

Paracentesis · 9 November 2010, 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by psv

The other way around-ish: the 16600 should have been updated with maxi hands and hour plots, perhaps the new bracelet system and we would all have been happy! :-)

Sorry, but I fail to see how larger hands and dial plots would improve the 16600. If you couldn't clearly see the original ones, you probably shouldn't be leaving the house unaccompanied.

snog · 9 November 2010, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paracentesis

If you couldn't clearly see the original ones, you probably shouldn't be leaving the house unaccompanied.

psv · 9 November 2010, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paracentesis

Sorry, but I fail to see how larger hands and dial plots would improve the 16600. If you couldn't clearly see the original ones, you probably shouldn't be leaving the house unaccompanied.

You obviously don't either dive in murky waters and/or have compared the lume brightness and longevity of Deepsea next to the SD 16600.

I've got 20/20 vision, but more is sometimes better.

Paracentesis · 9 November 2010, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by psv

You obviously don't either dive in murky waters and/or have compared the lume brightness and longevity of Deepsea next to the SD 16600.

I've got 20/20 vision, but more is sometimes better.

In that situation, I'm using a dive computer, plus a lamp. More light is better.

nauticajoe · 9 November 2010, 08:52 AM

I thought the DSSD was the new SD.

In all seriousness, the SubC does have the same weight presence as the SD but I like the feel of the SD better because it sits higher on the wrist.

Paracentesis · 9 November 2010, 09:20 AM

Down is the new up.

9 November 2010, 07:57 AM	#1
tmac141 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: GSV Watch: DJ41, SD, GMT Posts: 107	Sub-C is the new SD 16600 I have had my Sub-C for almost a week and have noticed that it wears a lot like a SD 16600. I believe the weight of the new Sub-C is similar to the 16600. However the sub-c is not as thick as the 16600, but thicker than the old 16610. I am really enjoying the sub-c, what a great watch.

9 November 2010, 08:15 AM	#2
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,077	The other way around-ish: the 16600 should have been updated with maxi hands and hour plots, perhaps the new bracelet system and we would all have been happy! :-)

9 November 2010, 08:52 AM	#9
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	I thought the DSSD was the new SD. In all seriousness, the SubC does have the same weight presence as the SD but I like the feel of the SD better because it sits higher on the wrist.

9 November 2010, 09:20 AM	#10
Paracentesis Banned Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: James Location: UK Watch: Tissot Posts: 1,454	Down is the new up.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)