ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

JJ Irani · 4 April 2007, 10:40 AM

As we all know, when the Sub was first introduced to the world in 1953 it come WITHOUT crown guards. These were incorporated much later into the case.

My question is: Has anyone here ever put these guards to the test to find out how really protective they are?

Cheers - JJ

colemanitis · 4 April 2007, 10:45 AM

Maybe your TT Sub could be our Guinea Pig? Send it to me and I'll knock it around a bit.

JJ Irani · 4 April 2007, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by colemanitis

Maybe your TT Sub could be our Guinea Pig? Send it to me and I'll knock it around a bit.

colemanitis · 4 April 2007, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

Of course, it'll have to be wearing a NATO during these tests!

Blown Wide Open · 4 April 2007, 10:46 AM

Since I ruminate over the slightest scatch on my bezel, case or bracelet of any of my beloved Rolexs, Im going to go with no...thank god.

PAtrick

leopardprey · 4 April 2007, 12:30 PM

I don't know if anyone has ever put them to a hard test, but I will bet the reason Rolex put them on there is that with the originals I bet they had several crowns get banged up and damaged without the guards- thus the addition of the crown guards.

davor · 4 April 2007, 02:56 PM

it would be great if somebody could find some vids of rolex testing their products...

watchnut · 5 April 2007, 12:50 AM

There's a good question. Did Rolex invent the crown guard? If so, there's another inovation that everybody has copied!

astcell · 5 April 2007, 01:29 AM

Crown Guard. Sounds like a deodorant.

vdave · 5 April 2007, 01:39 AM

I thought these crown gaurds have more to do with water proofness rather than just protecting the crown. I was reading somewhere that these were introduced to solve a problem with making the crown more water proof.

Just my thoughts...

nko51 · 5 April 2007, 01:48 AM

I allows the crown to slide off objects easier, rather than get snagged!

advocatia · 5 April 2007, 03:47 AM

JJ: short of exposing the watch to intentional damage, how would you propose one "test" the crown guards? and yes... I am busting your you know whats !

JJ Irani · 5 April 2007, 04:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by advocatia

JJ: short of exposing the watch to intentional damage, how would you propose one "test" the crown guards? and yes... I am busting your you know whats !

....as usual, you tosser!!

Great to have you back and posting, Andy!!

JJ Irani · 5 April 2007, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vdave

I thought these crown gaurds have more to do with water proofness rather than just protecting the crown. I was reading somewhere that these were introduced to solve a problem with making the crown more water proof.

Just my thoughts...

The crown guards have nothing whatsoever to do with the waterproofness of the watch.

Like I said, when the Sub was first introduced way back in 1953, it came in without any guards, but was still waterproof down to like 600 ft (?).

The guards are meant to protect the crown from sudden impacts in case the wearer gets too frisky!!

Cheers - JJ

4 April 2007, 10:40 AM	#1
JJ Irani Fondly Remembered Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: JJ Location: Auckland, NZ Watch: ALL SOLD!! Posts: 74,319	Crown guards - anyone ever put them to the test? As we all know, when the Sub was first introduced to the world in 1953 it come WITHOUT crown guards. These were incorporated much later into the case. My question is: Has anyone here ever put these guards to the test to find out how really protective they are? Cheers - JJ __________________ Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!

4 April 2007, 10:45 AM	#2
colemanitis "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Real Name: Jeff Location: Florida Watch: PAM 1090 Posts: 3,723	Maybe your TT Sub could be our Guinea Pig? Send it to me and I'll knock it around a bit. __________________ Member #471

4 April 2007, 10:46 AM	#5
Blown Wide Open "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Real Name: Patrick Location: Pennsylvania Watch: All with a crown. Posts: 504	Since I ruminate over the slightest scatch on my bezel, case or bracelet of any of my beloved Rolexs, Im going to go with no...thank god. PAtrick __________________ "I wouldn't be part of any club that would have me as a member." Instagram: El_Diablo_Rosso

5 April 2007, 01:48 AM	#11
nko51 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Alex Location: USA Watch: TT Blue Sub Posts: 2,542	I allows the crown to slide off objects easier, rather than get snagged! __________________

4 April 2007, 12:30 PM	#6
leopardprey Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: Chad Location: Around the world Watch: Panerai 233 Posts: 4,204	I don't know if anyone has ever put them to a hard test, but I will bet the reason Rolex put them on there is that with the originals I bet they had several crowns get banged up and damaged without the guards- thus the addition of the crown guards.

4 April 2007, 02:56 PM	#7
davor "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Real Name: davor Location: croatia Posts: 669	it would be great if somebody could find some vids of rolex testing their products...

5 April 2007, 12:50 AM	#8
watchnut "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: David Location: SW Fla Watch: SS Daytona & TT DJ Posts: 1,430	There's a good question. Did Rolex invent the crown guard? If so, there's another inovation that everybody has copied!

5 April 2007, 01:29 AM	#9
astcell "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Robert Location: Angelus Oaks, CA Watch: 116713 Posts: 6,828	Crown Guard. Sounds like a deodorant.

5 April 2007, 01:39 AM	#10
vdave Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Dave Location: Texas Watch: Oyster DT & GMT II Posts: 75	I thought these crown gaurds have more to do with water proofness rather than just protecting the crown. I was reading somewhere that these were introduced to solve a problem with making the crown more water proof. Just my thoughts...

5 April 2007, 03:47 AM	#12
advocatia Banned Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Andy Location: Florida USA Watch: PAM 422 GMTIIC Posts: 868	JJ: short of exposing the watch to intentional damage, how would you propose one "test" the crown guards? and yes... I am busting your you know whats !

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)