The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5 May 2011, 11:59 PM   #1
zapot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Red Dot
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 22
Is there a reason for this?

Hi,

Is there a reason for Rolex and other watch makers to only put a date dial that goes from 1 - 31? I meant wouldnt it be good if the dial is from 1 - 31 and then 1 - 30. This way,we just have to adjust our watch only once a year (Feb). Too squeezy to put all of them in? Or any other reason(s)?
zapot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 12:04 AM   #2
esm
"TRF" Member
 
esm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapot View Post
Hi,

Is there a reason for Rolex and other watch makers to only put a date dial that goes from 1 - 31? I meant wouldnt it be good if the dial is from 1 - 31 and then 1 - 30. This way,we just have to adjust our watch only once a year (Feb). Too squeezy to put all of them in? Or any other reason(s)?
i think that is because date wheel only comes in single layer.... so it'd be very unlikely the designers going to spend time and effort to make/find another location for a second date wheel/2nd layer


(google pic)
esm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 12:21 AM   #3
Numismatist
"TRF" Member
 
Numismatist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Chris
Location: Camden ME & STT
Watch: 116600
Posts: 6,350
To do this is a much higher 'complication'; Patek, Vacheron, A. Lange & Sohne and others do this, but it significantly raises the price.
__________________
Rolex 116600 Sea-dweller
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White Legrand FP
Montblanc Solitaire Doué Black & White RB
Montblanc Meisterstück Diamond Mozart BP
Montblanc Meisterstück Mozart BP
Numismatist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 01:16 AM   #4
zapot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Red Dot
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Numismatist View Post
To do this is a much higher 'complication'; Patek, Vacheron, A. Lange & Sohne and others do this, but it significantly raises the price.
But I thought if they are able to squeeze another 1 - 30 into the date wheel instead of any complication or second date wheel, doesnt that solve it? Well, no perpetual calendar per say but at least need to unscrew the crown only once a year.
zapot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 01:18 AM   #5
MikelSS
"TRF" Member
 
MikelSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mikel
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapot View Post
But I thought if they are able to squeeze another 1 - 30 into the date wheel instead of any complication or second date wheel, doesnt that solve it? Well, no perpetual calendar per say but at least need to unscrew the crown only once a year.
But you still have July & August and December & January with 31 days
MikelSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 01:25 AM   #6
Mosco
"TRF" Member
 
Mosco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Greg
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: I like to...
Posts: 18,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikelSS View Post
But you still have July & August and December & January with 31 days
Right. What OP is saying is that there would be ONE date wheel with 1-31, then 1-30 - basically with 61 markers. It is actually a good idea, IMO. That's close to an annual calendar, not perpetual, though.
__________________
Instagram - @CaliberSwiss

“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson
Mosco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 01:34 AM   #7
MikelSS
"TRF" Member
 
MikelSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mikel
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: GMT II
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosco View Post
Right. What OP is saying is that there would be ONE date wheel with 1-31, then 1-30 - basically with 61 markers. It is actually a good idea, IMO. That's close to an annual calendar, not perpetual, though.
Right, but you would still have to change it in Feb, August and then Jan instead of Feb, April, Jun, Sept & Nov.

My point was that it not 1 change a year, it's 3 instead of 5. I love changing the date on my watch (it's my alone time with it hahaha)

MikelSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 02:41 AM   #8
mrbill2mrbill2
"TRF" Member
 
mrbill2mrbill2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Mr. Bill
Location: South Florida
Watch: 16610
Posts: 6,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosco View Post
Right. What OP is saying is that there would be ONE date wheel with 1-31, then 1-30 - basically with 61 markers. It is actually a good idea, IMO. That's close to an annual calendar, not perpetual, though.
And add a 5x cyclops, the numbers would be half the size, and you are good to go.

mrbill2mrbill2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 02:47 AM   #9
Roja
"TRF" Member
 
Roja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Pierre
Location: Spain/Canada
Watch: and learn...
Posts: 533
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosco View Post
Right. What OP is saying is that there would be ONE date wheel with 1-31, then 1-30 - basically with 61 markers. It is actually a good idea, IMO. That's close to an annual calendar, not perpetual, though.
Then, each time you'd adjust the date, you'd have to flip through 30 numbers instead of 2...

What Bighaole said!
Roja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 02:10 AM   #10
Roxas
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Earth
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 516
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapot View Post
But I thought if they are able to squeeze another 1 - 30 into the date wheel instead of any complication or second date wheel, doesnt that solve it? Well, no perpetual calendar per say but at least need to unscrew the crown only once a year.
Not easy like that. The date wheel is not big enough to contain 61 numbers.
Roxas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 12:25 AM   #11
johnnyc
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: florida
Posts: 67
local watch shop told me that a perpetual calendar is at least a 40k watch. don't know how true that is. higher complication
johnnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 01:06 AM   #12
mitchy
"TRF" Member
 
mitchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Mitch
Location: .
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 2,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyc View Post
local watch shop told me that a perpetual calendar is at least a 40k watch. don't know how true that is. higher complication
not true omega makes a Deville Hour Vision PC for about 15K in SS which is a remarkable price
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting, was not wasted

John Lennon
mitchy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 01:48 AM   #13
Danand
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitchy View Post
not true omega makes a Deville Hour Vision PC for about 15K in SS which is a remarkable price
Even cheaper is the omega aquaterra annual calendar at about 9-10k in ss. It's quite a nice watch.
Danand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 12:26 AM   #14
Casey VP-26
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: America
Posts: 2,721
If you include Feb. This would be a perpetual calendar
Casey VP-26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 01:29 AM   #15
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
It would be a BIG datewheel. Wouldn't the watch face have to be more than twice as big? Could maybe do it with two small wheels each going from 0 to 9. like a rolling counter. As for the movement I dunno how complicated that would be to include it in a watch movement.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 01:31 AM   #16
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Adjusting the date has never bothered me. It's about becoming acquainted with your watch!
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 02:13 AM   #17
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Maybe use smaller numbers. It would NEED a cyclops though :p
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 02:34 AM   #18
Tri-Tip
"TRF" Member
 
Tri-Tip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CA, USA
Watch: Out!!!
Posts: 6,471
How about one with a whole year on it, it would have to have a Feb 29, and all but leap year, you'd have to move it forward once a year.

A friend of mine has some fancy watch that is supposedly good on dates for up to 100 years from now.
Tri-Tip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 03:34 AM   #19
clarencek
"TRF" Member
 
clarencek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tri-Tip View Post
A friend of mine has some fancy watch that is supposedly good on dates for up to 100 years from now.
Is it a G-Shock?
clarencek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 04:08 AM   #20
bighaole
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Watch: Exp II + Daytona
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by clarencek View Post
Is it a G-Shock?
From a description of the IWC perpetual calendar mechanism:

The calendar will function properly until the year 2499, though it will require an internal adjustment on March 1, 2100 (in which year the normally expected leap year will be skipped). Those watches with century display will also require a special service on January 1, 2200 to replace the century slide with one numbered 22, 23, and 24. Interestingly, those watches with the century display create one of the most extreme ratios in the history of watchmaking: for each movement of the century slide, the escape wheel has completed about 6.3 billion rotations and the balance has completed approximately 94.5 billion half-swings.
bighaole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 02:41 AM   #21
bighaole
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Watch: Exp II + Daytona
Posts: 452
The other problem to consider is, with a single 31 day wheel, you have to click ahead 1 to 3 days, 5 times a year. With this 61 day wheel, you'd be good until August 31st, when you'd have to click through 30 days to reset your date. The same would happen when you cycled back around to January.
bighaole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 03:05 AM   #22
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
Come on guys, it's not really a chore to change the date is it? It's part of owning the watch. I seriously don't see what the deal is here. I'm sure they've already thought of this and decided it was pretty pointless? It's a tried and tested thoroughly robust movement. It can only be something else to malfuntion if they add extra datewheel mechanisms for the sake of people being too lazy to change the date. :p!!
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 03:11 AM   #23
Abid
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 466
I for one get excited to open the crown of my watch, just to see the trip lock and how smooth it is! To each there own tho!
Abid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 11:04 AM   #24
zapot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Red Dot
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abid View Post
I for one get excited to open the crown of my watch, just to see the trip lock and how smooth it is! To each there own tho!
Me too, excited to open the crown. But scared that I will not screw the crown properly and water will get in, also afraid that I might damage the screw threads. Not to mention I still have to adjust the time correctly... : )
zapot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 03:17 AM   #25
rolexertion
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by zapot View Post
I meant wouldnt it be good if the dial is from 1 - 31 and then 1 - 30. This way,we just have to adjust our watch only once a year (Feb). Too squeezy to put all of them in? Or any other reason(s)?
There are actually three spots where an alternating 30/31 would not work: December and January both have 31 days, as do July and August. February of course would also need adjusting for.
rolexertion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 11:07 AM   #26
zapot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Red Dot
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexertion View Post
There are actually three spots where an alternating 30/31 would not work: December and January both have 31 days, as do July and August. February of course would also need adjusting for.
That's right, I didnt think abt that earlier on, perhaps that is why no watch maker bothers to do that.

But what about making August 30 days, Sep 31 days and so on to our calendar instead, then maybe that concept will work? Then only one change a year?
zapot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 10:38 AM   #27
dnagwhogas
"TRF" Member
 
dnagwhogas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: MauiBacerdo
Location: Chicago
Watch: N :Learn
Posts: 902
You guys have too much time on your hands to have thought of this...LIKE ME!
__________________

P-Club Member # 7

Time is what prevents everything from happening at once.
dnagwhogas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 May 2011, 01:47 PM   #28
Zed Homme
"TRF" Member
 
Zed Homme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: usa
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 6,962
Everybody is forgetting that October has 31 days as well. So from oct till Jan, you'd need to stay at 31. An annual calendar movement would be easier...
Zed Homme is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.