ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
6 July 2011, 10:20 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Outside
Watch: Isn't it obvious?
Posts: 1,926
|
Water resistance of the Speedy Pro
I am considering wearing my Speedy Pro on an open ocean boat trip for 10 days. Can it withstand getting wet, humidity, shallow immersion and constant exposure to salt water? Any thoughts?
__________________
Subfiend |
6 July 2011, 11:20 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: EU
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 576
|
If the waterproofness has been tested prior, then there should be no problems.
Omega says a Speedy is waterresistent to 50m, which means shower, but not swimming. My Speedy Pro always pass the 100m water test, so I use mine for shower and swimming, no problems yet. Nasa tested these watches with great abuse, and they survived. |
6 July 2011, 11:46 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Balkans
Watch: Rolex Sea-Dweller
Posts: 49
|
I'd prefer to keep my Speedy Pro topside or at least very shallow (swimming). I recently had my Seamaster Pro (2531) serviced and found that water had penetrated the case (bad seal) and saturated the movement. Anyway, any watch can fail no matter what the WR rating. The Speedy pro is a fairly robust tool watch and should be okay for swimming (50m WR), etc, but I'd wouldn't recommend any diving or prolonged submersions with it. BTW, I usually post on TZ and WUS and generally lurk here...
|
7 July 2011, 12:01 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Watch: DSSD, Omega SMP
Posts: 3,055
|
I would swim with it, but would go no deeper than say 7-8 feet ( IE - no diving ).
These are very rugged watches, and can take a lot of abuse, but I would not trust one in the water for extended periods of time. |
7 July 2011, 12:13 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,613
|
I wouldn't risk it especially for long periods of time. My sapphire sandwich has only seen rain. I do dive with my SMP up to 120' deep.
__________________
116520 116610LN 126334 126600 PAM986 |
7 July 2011, 01:14 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lexington
Posts: 459
|
Buy a G-Shock.
__________________
Grand Seiko SBGR051 |
7 July 2011, 02:59 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 908
|
doesn't the waterproof metre measurement stand for the air pressure the watch can withstand rather than an actual measure of the depth you could take the watch too? an air pressure test of 100m is not the same as diving 100m wearing the watch,maybe someone can put me right on this.
|
7 July 2011, 08:20 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Outside
Watch: Isn't it obvious?
Posts: 1,926
|
__________________
Subfiend |
7 July 2011, 09:23 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lexington
Posts: 459
|
Try this one instead
Seriously, the Speedy is not designed for the type of activity you're describing. You need a more special purpose watch. Maybe pick up a Seiko Monster or 007 for your trip?
__________________
Grand Seiko SBGR051 |
7 July 2011, 07:55 PM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,450
|
You are fine with light swimming, bathing. The watch is water resistant up to 50M as long as the watch is up to date with its service.
|
12 July 2011, 03:31 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Chad
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Watch: Rolex, PAM, Omega
Posts: 1,607
|
I agree! I shower and swim with mine. No problems. Just don't push buttons or mess with the crown when wet.
__________________
Rolex P-Series SS GMT II Black, Rolex Y-Series Sea-Dweller, Rolex F-Series TT Blue Sub, Rolex F-Series Sub LV, Rolex D-Series Ladies SS/WG DJ for wife, Panerai K-Series PAM 112, Omega Speedmaster Pro 3570.50, Omega Seamaster 300M Chrono 2594.52 |
7 July 2011, 10:38 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nick
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Watch: Omega
Posts: 825
|
Honestly....no.
If it was a freshwater trip I would say no problem but since you're going to be in the ocean I would go for a diver instead. |
8 July 2011, 06:03 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
I can't understand why 50m depth rating from Omega means shower, while 50 meters from Rolex means 50m.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
9 July 2011, 02:05 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 908
|
Quote:
I too thought all depth measurements were a standard across all watches but it seems the metres value does not relate to a diving depth on some watches but to the air pressure used in the course of the water resistance test,which is why I would prefer a watch not be tested using an air pressure test as most are but actually see some water in the course of the test. |
|
11 July 2011, 01:41 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NB, TX
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 1,016
|
I bought mine in St. Thomas last January. I was snorkeling with it within 2 hours. It isn't a dive watch.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.