The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > General Topics > Open Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 September 2011, 04:00 PM   #1
gmh1013
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: greg
Location: Tempe AZ
Watch: GMT
Posts: 5,702
What would you get 4 cyl Honda Accord or 4cyl Toyota Camry?

Its a 25 years old argument but Ive owned Toyota (4cyl) all my adult life since 1981 when I bought a 82 Toyota SR5 pick-up.
My brother says a 4cyl Accord is a better all around car (resale included) ....

The new 2012 Camry is out now and looks pretty darn good to me. Would would you get?
I base my love of Toyota because My Highlander has been perfect and the Camry my wife had before that and the Camry before that one. One more question is Has anybody else had a bad Honda ? My wife's daughter had a 2001 Civic EX that was the worst car since a 76 Chevy Vega.
Transmission went out at 40k ....Struts at 50k .....second transmission at 70k
at 75k she got a Toyota RAV4
Ive been waiting for new model year to get a new Camry LE 4 cyl but he says I should look a Honda before I buy one.
gmh1013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2011, 05:45 PM   #2
Demosthene
"TRF" Member
 
Demosthene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 1,326
The families has two Camry’s now, there brutally reliable (the older ones on 230k with with no problems)

Unfortunately they handle like boats.
Demosthene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2011, 05:53 PM   #3
blackmsport
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melb - Australia
Posts: 2,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demosthene View Post
The families has two Camry’s now, there brutally reliable (the older ones on 230k with with no problems)

Unfortunately they handle like boats.
They are boats...... the v6 is a luxury boat

and Lexus is a super Luxury Boat
blackmsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2011, 05:55 PM   #4
drtooth73
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
I had a Prelude some time ago, and the first time I needed new brakes and tires was at 100000 miles. Both Camry and Accord are great cars, though
drtooth73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2011, 08:17 PM   #5
drgleeds37
"TRF" Member
 
drgleeds37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Daniel Leeds
Location: Suburbs of DC
Watch: Rolex,AP,PAM,etc..
Posts: 306
I have a 4cyl EXL-Nav Accord that I currently drive daily. It is awesome on gas, I just made a trip from DC to Detroit on a single tank. Both cars are about equally reliable, I think the Honda is a little more sporty and the Toyota is a little more luxury. In the end it always comes down to personal preference.

-Daniel
drgleeds37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2011, 08:28 PM   #6
crew
"TRF" Member
 
crew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: John
Location: Rochester/Naples
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 18,307
I have a CRV as well as a Camry LE. IMHO, Honda makes very strong engines. They seem to be more performance oriented than Toyota. The Camry seems more economy oriented. Between these two cars I prefer the older Camry over the CRV. It has twice the miles of the Honda and has been trouble free.
Both are good cars, but my next purchase is likely to be a Toyota.
crew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2011, 10:15 PM   #7
chicfarmer1
"TRF" Member
 
chicfarmer1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: J
Location: USA Midwest
Watch: Midsize Datejust
Posts: 2,611
Would you consider taking a look at the Nissan Altima? It's so much nicer than either. Elegant design, much better handling than the Camry, way more comfortable and quieter than the Honda, great fuel economy (performs better than it's listed).
chicfarmer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 02:40 AM   #8
gqllc
"TRF" Member
 
gqllc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Albany NY
Watch: Blue Bezel SubC
Posts: 1,511
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicfarmer1 View Post
Would you consider taking a look at the Nissan Altima? It's so much nicer than either. Elegant design, much better handling than the Camry, way more comfortable and quieter than the Honda, great fuel economy (performs better than it's listed).
The Nissan Altima got some of the highest consumer report ratings ever on a car....96 out of 100
__________________
K-TT Datejust, Random Blue Bezel SubC
gqllc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2011, 11:07 PM   #9
RRGHOST1
"TRF" Member
 
RRGHOST1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 4,004
Of the two i think the new Camry is a nicer looking car IMO. Both are good, its just preference really.
RRGHOST1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2011, 11:12 PM   #10
Vetteman
"TRF" Member
 
Vetteman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NC
Watch: 16610
Posts: 420
They both make me Yawn... But I'd chose the Accord if those were my only choices
Vetteman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2011, 11:23 PM   #11
skypilot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Iowa, USA
Posts: 490
My daughter is very hard on cars and gives them no care and her Accord has 160,000+ miles on it and she has no thought of getting rid of it.
On the other hand, a company with which I am familiar has a fleet of 36 Corollas and routinely drives them to 200,000+ miles with very little care.
Pretty tough to go wrong.
skypilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2011, 12:12 AM   #12
Route 66
"TRF" Member
 
Route 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: Burbank, CA
Watch: 214270 Mark II
Posts: 4,121
I'd go with the Honda. Toyota has had some quality control problems surface over the last few years that would make me a little hesitant to buy one. Who know how long long they've had those problems before they became news?
Route 66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2011, 12:46 AM   #13
Demosthene
"TRF" Member
 
Demosthene's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Perth Australia
Posts: 1,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by StevArn View Post
I'd go with the Honda. Toyota has had some quality control problems surface over the last few years that would make me a little hesitant to buy one. Who know how long long they've had those problems before they became news?
Toyota only made the news because they are seen as the gold standard of quality control.
Not only are they still world leaders, but they also invented and established many of the significant quality control mechanisms that are now used globally (Kaizen, Kanban, 5S, JIT) and by all there competitors.
Demosthene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2011, 12:42 AM   #14
smallcandle
"TRF" Member
 
smallcandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Kansas
Watch: 16610, Omega PO
Posts: 1,898
I'd go with the Toyota. I've owned a Tacoma (v6) and two 4Runners (both v8) and feel that Toyota makes a very high-quality vehicle. None of those trucks ever gave me any problems - just give it oil and gas and you're good to go.
__________________

Things got out of control and I had to stab a clown...
smallcandle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2011, 12:58 AM   #15
drtooth73
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmh1013 View Post
Its a 25 years old argument but Ive owned Toyota (4cyl) all my adult life since 1981 when I bought a 82 Toyota SR5 pick-up.
Math is not your strongest subject
I'd say go with Camry, it looks better.
drtooth73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2011, 01:57 AM   #16
Dr. Robert
"TRF" Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 65,274
I vote for the new Camry......I am a big fan of the Honda Accord.....I have owned both.
The 2012 Accord (4cyl.) still has a 5 spd. automatic gearbox......and even though it's been recalibrated, etc., there's a 6 spd. auto box in the 2012 Camry(4cyl.).
The Accord has too many buttons for stuff, Camry much cleaner in the button category.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2011, 04:34 AM   #17
CashGap
"TRF" Member
 
CashGap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
Both EXCELLENT.

This will come down to personal preference and small issues of "leap-frogging", where one manufacturer has a temporary edge in a narrow area on their 2004-2008 product in 2004 and 2005, the other manufacturer has an edge in their 2006-2010 product in 2006 and 2007, etc.
CashGap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2011, 04:44 AM   #18
GradyPhilpott
2025 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,476
I like the way the Accord handles with the double wishbone and multilink suspension.

The 2.4l iVTEC DOHC engine is quite peppy in my 2003 model. I prefer the 5-speed manual transmission.
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2011, 04:56 AM   #19
Dr. Robert
"TRF" Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 65,274
If you get the Camry, go for the SE version.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2011, 05:06 AM   #20
Mosco
"TRF" Member
 
Mosco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Greg
Location: Cincinnati
Watch: I like to...
Posts: 18,567
I'd get one of each so that there's a respectable amount of cylinders
__________________
Instagram - @CaliberSwiss

“A man who procrastinates in his choosing will inevitably have his choice made for him by circumstance.” - Hunter S. Thompson
Mosco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2011, 08:13 AM   #21
drtooth73
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mosco View Post
I'd get one of each so that there's a respectable amount of cylinders
drtooth73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 02:09 AM   #22
robertneville
"TRF" Member
 
robertneville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Greg
Location: PA
Watch: me burn
Posts: 1,435
camry = run for ever. mine had 325k miles when i traded it in...
__________________

Motocross is life!
robertneville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 02:34 AM   #23
kcmo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertneville View Post
camry = run for ever. mine had 325k miles when i traded it in...
Wow, that's amazing! I got a Highlander Sport in January of this year and I only have 3700 miles on it! At this rate I could probably drive it for the next 20 years! LOL!
kcmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 02:45 AM   #24
robertneville
"TRF" Member
 
robertneville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Greg
Location: PA
Watch: me burn
Posts: 1,435
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcmo View Post
Wow, that's amazing! I got a Highlander Sport in January of this year and I only have 3700 miles on it! At this rate I could probably drive it for the next 20 years! LOL!
my wife drives a lot for her business. replaced it with an Lexus RX400h, and she says she wants the camry back!!!
__________________

Motocross is life!
robertneville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 02:48 AM   #25
kcmo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by robertneville View Post
my wife drives a lot for her business. replaced it with an Lexus RX400h, and she says she wants the camry back!!!
I guess she was quite attached!
kcmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 02:41 AM   #26
Dr. Robert
"TRF" Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 65,274

I've had this since new....a 2001 model....the Highlander is based on the evergreen Camry....as are a few Toyota & Lexus models......still going strong.....no problems ever.
I'd get another....
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 02:44 AM   #27
kcmo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Karis
Location: USA
Posts: 19,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Robert View Post

I've had this since new....a 2001 model....the Highlander is based on the evergreen Camry....as are a few Toyota & Lexus models......still going strong.....no problems ever.
I'd get another....
Wow, that's great! I got a 2011 Sport model in January and I LOVE it! Had an X3 before and the HL is MUCH more comfortable! Looking forward to driving it for a long time
kcmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 02:49 AM   #28
gwalker
"TRF" Member
 
gwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Gunter
Location: AL/NJ
Watch: DSSD; 116610LN
Posts: 5,509
I personally like the Camry better than the Accord as far as looks go. They are both very reliable cars so I think that's even. Pick what you like best. Read consumer reports and see what they say. I don't think I will ever own a 4cyl though. Every vehicle I've owned has been a V8 except my Dodge 3500 which has a 5.9 liter 6cyl Cummins diesel. I need power!!!
gwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2011, 02:54 AM   #29
Dr. Robert
"TRF" Member
 
Dr. Robert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 65,274
Since 1997 the Toyota Camry has been the best selling car in America every year but one....2001.
I've owned cars from Toyota, Lexus, Honda & Acura......all good, but at this moment
I would by a 2012 Camry over a 2012 Accord.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Dr. Robert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2011, 01:40 AM   #30
looking to buy
"TRF" Member
 
looking to buy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Bob
Location: Paradise CA
Posts: 920
My wife had a 1994 Accord that she put 180,000 miles on and did very little maintenance. When we sold it, it ran great. My daughter just totaled her 2001 Accord with 124,000 miles on it. It ran like a top. I just bought her a 2003 Accord that has 138,000 miles on it that was meticulously maintained. I hope she can get another 100,000 out of it. I have a 2003 Element that I have put 105,000 miles on, and it has never had any issues.

I really do not believe there is a whole lot of difference between Toyotas and Hondas. It boils down to which design do you like the best. The accords are pretty plain but you cannot beat the performance. The Toyota looks a little better. I like the racing heritage of Honda and suspect that some of that may work its way into better engines. Either way you cannot go wrong.
looking to buy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.