The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23 August 2007, 03:39 AM   #1
The Crown
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Phillip
Location: Boca Raton
Watch: SS Submariner
Posts: 22
Watch Rankings

An AD told me there was a ranking of watch makers as to how accurate the watches were, along other criteria, with Patek at the top and rolex sitting about #5. Do any of you know what he was reffering to? Would be interesting to check out.
Thanks
Phillip
The Crown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:12 AM   #2
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
i have no idea about that. Let's see what the other forum members will say
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:18 AM   #3
roadcarver
"TRF" Member
 
roadcarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
For accuracy (not specifically targetting automatics), I think a superquartz would be at the top of a list.
__________________
I'm just a cook...
roadcarver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:23 AM   #4
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
what's the difference of a quartz and a superquatz?
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:33 AM   #5
Stef_Call
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Stefan
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Watch: SS Daytona,GMT IIc
Posts: 470
errrrrrr??? I'll take a guess SuperQuartz is more accurate ?? :)
Stef_Call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:34 AM   #6
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
So superquartz is more accurate than quartz ?
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:35 AM   #7
Stef_Call
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Stefan
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Watch: SS Daytona,GMT IIc
Posts: 470
SuperQuartz compensates for temperature changes which is why it is so much more accurate
Stef_Call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:36 AM   #8
Stef_Call
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Stefan
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Watch: SS Daytona,GMT IIc
Posts: 470
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stef_Call View Post
SuperQuartz compensates for temperature changes which is why it is so much more accurate
Or so I read on another forum
Stef_Call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:37 AM   #9
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stef_Call View Post
SuperQuartz compensates for temperature changes which is why it is so much more accurate
That's right...it's also called a THERMOCOMPENSATED Quartz movement.

Owned a Longines VHP (Very High Precision) once which was fitted with such a quartz movement. Super duper accurate....within 1 second a month....guaranteed.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:41 AM   #10
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
That's right...it's also called a THERMOCOMPENSATED Quartz movement.

Owned a Longines VHP (Very High Precision) once which was fitted with such a quartz movement. Super duper accurate....within 1 second a month....guaranteed.

JJ
Thanks for the info JJ
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:38 AM   #11
BiG JeEzY
"TRF" Member
 
BiG JeEzY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
I heard radio controlled quartz watches are one of the most accurate in the world. Its like having an atomic clock on your wrist. Only less than a second off after one year.
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001)
-Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978)
-Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991)
-Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique
-Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial
BiG JeEzY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:38 AM   #12
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
somebody is going to answer to our question. Let's be patient and stop confusing ourselves
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:39 AM   #13
Stef_Call
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Stefan
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Watch: SS Daytona,GMT IIc
Posts: 470
Think it just got answered !!
Stef_Call is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:41 AM   #14
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stef_Call View Post
Think it just got answered !!
You were right from the beginning
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:49 AM   #15
roadcarver
"TRF" Member
 
roadcarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
Darn... I missed the party!
__________________
I'm just a cook...
roadcarver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:52 AM   #16
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadcarver View Post
Darn... I missed the party!
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:55 AM   #17
BiG JeEzY
"TRF" Member
 
BiG JeEzY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jerome
Location: N. California
Watch: GMT I/EXP II/DJ
Posts: 3,351
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadcarver View Post
Darn... I missed the party!
You were only about 15 or so minutes late, the party's just getting started up in here!
__________________
-Rolex Explorer II Black dial 16570 (circa 2001)
-Rolex GMT Master I Pepsi 1675 (circa 1978)
-Rolex Datejust TT Champagne 16233 (circa 1991)
-Vintage Longines Automatic La Grande Classique
-Vintage Seiko 6138 Automatic Chronograph with "Kakume" Dial
BiG JeEzY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:57 AM   #18
roadcarver
"TRF" Member
 
roadcarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Vernon
Location: C-a-n-a-d-a
Watch: 16600
Posts: 5,641
LOL! I was busy surfing watchnet.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by BiG JeEzY View Post
You were only about 15 or so minutes late, the party's just getting started up in here!
__________________
I'm just a cook...
roadcarver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 04:57 AM   #19
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Crown View Post
An AD told me there was a ranking of watch makers as to how accurate the watches were, along other criteria, with Patek at the top and rolex sitting about #5. ...Thanks
Phillip
A comment by an AD should not be taken as any more than that....

Subjective "polls" and "rankings" are everywhere, as well as unsupported comments and rumors....usually for the purpose of "proving" the sponsors or commentors point...

As an item of interest, Forbes magazine just came out with the 10 "essential" items a man should have in his wardrobe....For a watch it was the Submariner - of course, it also said he should have a pair of Levis 501's and they cost 198 bucks, so take that for what it's worth also.
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 08:15 AM   #20
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Crown View Post
....with Patek at the top and rolex sitting about #5. Do any of you know what he was reffering to? Would be interesting to check out.
Thanks
Phillip
I saw this "World Rang List" of watches somewhere here on TRF (had it saved as a Word document, but cannot find the link), but on that list, Rolex is "number 5", too:

Tier 1 High End Luxury
a) Patek Phillippe A. Lange & Sohne
b) Audemars Piguet Vacheron Constantin
c) Breguet Glasshutte Original Girrard Perregaux Blancpain
d) Ulysse Nardin Franck Muller Jaeger LeCoultre F.P. Journe

Tier 2 Luxury
a) IWC Rolex Piaget
b) Cartier Chopard Maurice Lacroix
c) Breitling Omega Chronoswiss
d) Bvlgari Zenith

Tier 3 Transitory Luxury
a) Baume & Mercier Raymond Weil
b) Tag Heuer
c)
d)

Tier 4 Basic Luxury
a) Movado Rado
b) Fortis
c) Oris Revue Thommen
d)
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 09:16 AM   #21
frostie
1,000,000th PostMember
 
frostie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,048
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacedweller View Post
I saw this "World Rang List" of watches somewhere here on TRF (had it saved as a Word document, but cannot find the link), but on that list, Rolex is "number 5", too:

Tier 1 High End Luxury
a) Patek Phillippe A. Lange & Sohne
b) Audemars Piguet Vacheron Constantin
c) Breguet Glasshutte Original Girrard Perregaux Blancpain
d) Ulysse Nardin Franck Muller Jaeger LeCoultre F.P. Journe

Tier 2 Luxury
a) IWC Rolex Piaget
b) Cartier Chopard Maurice Lacroix
c) Breitling Omega Chronoswiss
d) Bvlgari Zenith

Tier 3 Transitory Luxury
a) Baume & Mercier Raymond Weil
b) Tag Heuer
c)
d)

Tier 4 Basic Luxury
a) Movado Rado
b) Fortis
c) Oris Revue Thommen
d)
That's intersting info bo thanks for sharing
frostie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 09:45 AM   #22
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
So if you believe that, the Swatch Groups ETA movement watches are in the Tier 1 luxury category and the lowly Rolex and IWC are only able to make it to a Tier 2...

I shoulda bought a Rado and stuck with the basics..
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 09:54 AM   #23
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spacedweller View Post
I saw this "World Rang List" of watches somewhere here on TRF (had it saved as a Word document, but cannot find the link), but on that list, Rolex is "number 5", too:

Tier 1 High End Luxury
a) Patek Phillippe A. Lange & Sohne
b) Audemars Piguet Vacheron Constantin
c) Breguet Glasshutte Original Girrard Perregaux Blancpain
d) Ulysse Nardin Franck Muller Jaeger LeCoultre F.P. Journe

Tier 2 Luxury
a) IWC Rolex Piaget
b) Cartier Chopard Maurice Lacroix
c) Breitling Omega Chronoswiss
d) Bvlgari Zenith

Tier 3 Transitory Luxury
a) Baume & Mercier Raymond Weil
b) Tag Heuer
c)
d)

Tier 4 Basic Luxury
a) Movado Rado
b) Fortis
c) Oris Revue Thommen
d)
UN and GP in the Super Luxury tier?
__________________
..33
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 10:12 AM   #24
SPACE-DWELLER
"TRF" Member
 
SPACE-DWELLER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welshwatchman View Post
UN and GP in the Super Luxury tier?
Well, I did not make that list

But I assume that the list is made on the principles "How many watches made per year" + "in-house movements or not".

Rolex has now in-house movements ONLY, but then again makes about 900,000 watches a year.

Patek has also solely in-house movements but makes FAR less. That makes for a Tier 1.

IWC makes also far less watches than Rolex, but does seldomly make OWN movements, but mostly modifies ETA movements. UN + GP, however, would also use modified NON in-house movements, but movements of higher built quality than ETA's (for example PERRELET movements in GP watches!) and also make fewer watches than Rolex per year. This would put them in a higher tier than Rolex.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo

LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...
SPACE-DWELLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 August 2007, 12:02 PM   #25
supermarz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: melbourne
Posts: 322
hmmm i wonder why breguet is below audemars.... i wouldve thought its the other way around.
franck muller has some nice designs but in my opinion it is overprice for what it is. havign said that though some collectors in asia are crazy about them. i saw franck muller's store when i was in hong kong ....PHWOA.....!! you can almost live in the place.

funny how this luxury tier doesnt really represent the re selling value of the watches. i think patek and rolex are the only two that holds their resell value best out of all. (except for collectors pieces that is put up in auction houses liek sothebys christies etc)
supermarz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.