ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
22 January 2012, 12:19 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melb - Australia
Posts: 2,959
|
Omega vs IWC what would you choose
This
OMEGA Seamaster Professional 300m Chrono Diver Reference 213.30.42.40.01.001 or this IWC 3717 |
22 January 2012, 12:22 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 166
|
This is hardly a choice.........in fact, a true no-brainer. The 3717 is a true classic when it comes to Chronos. I love my Planet Ocean and many other Omegas but I've owned a 3717 and its one of the best...simply a fabulous watch.
Enjoy no matter which you choose |
22 January 2012, 12:34 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: WNY
Posts: 166
|
Ditto
|
22 January 2012, 12:36 PM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: HR
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: -ing Barts.
Posts: 4,244
|
IWC my 5 cents pick
|
22 January 2012, 12:41 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
I prefer the IWC.
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
22 January 2012, 12:42 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,150
|
Iwc, not even close
|
22 January 2012, 01:00 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Daniel Leeds
Location: Suburbs of DC
Watch: Rolex,AP,PAM,etc..
Posts: 306
|
I'm a huge Omega fan but for it's the 3717-01 hands down.
-Daniel |
22 January 2012, 01:10 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melb - Australia
Posts: 2,959
|
wow 3717 wins all the way
|
22 January 2012, 03:19 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Illusive Man
Location: NYC
Watch: Omega Worldtimer
Posts: 670
|
Just so I can know, why is the IWC unanimously preffered over the Omega in this Chrono instance?
__________________
|
22 January 2012, 09:06 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Daniel Leeds
Location: Suburbs of DC
Watch: Rolex,AP,PAM,etc..
Posts: 306
|
Quote:
-Daniel |
|
22 January 2012, 03:26 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Duy
Location: New Orleans, LA
Watch: Speedmaster 3861
Posts: 1,925
|
I prefer the 3717 over that SMPC. IWC bracelet is really top notch, I prefer the thick pilot hand/dial, and the wrist presence is really nice.
__________________
De gustibus non est disputandum. |
22 January 2012, 03:26 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: massachusetts
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,692
|
IWC and I'm an Omega fan. Reason I pick the IWC is because of the cleaner and sharper design.
Funny b/c I think that Omegas look much better than IWCs in almost every instance when comparing similar type watches. This particular case is the exception. |
22 January 2012, 04:06 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
I've already made that choice and I would do the same if I had to do it again.
IWC Pilot Chronograph IW371713 However when it comes to chronographs and Omega there is one I definitely would get.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
23 January 2012, 02:06 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 166
|
Your gold 3717 is an absolute beauty .........one of the few gold watches I'd consider wearing!!!!!
|
23 January 2012, 02:50 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
Thank you, most gold watches on a strap are a bit more low key.
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
22 January 2012, 05:02 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
IWC. Everyday, and twice on Sundays :D
|
22 January 2012, 06:46 PM | #17 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: mark pearce
Location: australia
Watch: PO, 20000ft Diver
Posts: 170
|
I prefer the cleaner look of the Iwc.
|
22 January 2012, 08:06 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Steven
Location: Jazoom
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 1,092
|
neither for me sorry, to many other better looking chronos than these two.
__________________
|
23 January 2012, 02:05 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 166
|
We'd love to hear which chronos are better looking than the classic 3717 that are in and around the same price range??? I've owned a 3717 and a Daytona and I preferred the 3717 over the Daytona all day, everyday. Shocking, I know.........even I couldn't believe it!!!!
|
23 January 2012, 04:51 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Steven
Location: Jazoom
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 1,092
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
23 January 2012, 11:56 AM | #21 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 166
|
Quote:
As far as the new, Omega PO Chrono, my friend just picked one up......stunning but very, very thick......almost too thick. Hard for me to compare a diver chrono (really no need for one) to a pilot's watch. |
|
23 January 2012, 03:39 PM | #22 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Steven
Location: Jazoom
Watch: Milgauss GV
Posts: 1,092
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
22 January 2012, 10:53 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Asad A. Awan
Location: kabul, Afghanista
Watch: Tissot PRX
Posts: 2,698
|
IWC is a real classic..a true flieger..but if it were for me to purchase, I would go against the popular choice and opt for the Omega simply because when I want a sporty watch, I want it to be completely sporty, and the SMP has a lot of presence and true looks in real life...the IWC is much more subdued and elegant, which I think is not the main criteria for comparison here...I would go for the IWC (on black strap) if I wanted just one watch for all occassions, but the SMP for a sporty watch in a broader collection.
|
23 January 2012, 12:05 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Watch: SD4K
Posts: 880
|
I'd go for the IWC...
__________________
Lange 1815 Chrono, AP ROO 26470ST, RO 26230ST, Rolex 216570 (w), 116600, 116520 (w), IWC XV, PAM 366, 420, Omega 311.30.42.30.01.005, Seiko SKX007J, Apple Watch, a bunch of G-Shocks ------------------------------------------------------------- |
23 January 2012, 12:20 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: aroundtheworld
Watch: SS Daytona - BLACK
Posts: 2,261
|
I picked my chopard over both those watches, when deciding to buy. I would recommend that you take a look into it. However, I would pick the IWC if I didnt have the option of buying the chopard.
__________________
116520 Black - 116500 White - 116713LN - 116613LB - Panerai 389 - Chopard Mille Miglia GMT Chronograph - Chopard LUC Sport 2000 - Moser Pioneer Centre Seconds |
23 January 2012, 12:33 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,997
|
I would buy neither of them if i was buying a chrono.as i do not like any of the sub dials in that formation using one at the 12 position. Would find one like the Daytona layout.
|
23 January 2012, 12:58 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
|
Both are pretty solid. But Speedmaster Pro is a superior choice IMO.
|
23 January 2012, 01:12 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norway
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 274
|
The IWC.
I never liked a so called dive watch with a chronograph. What's the point? |
23 January 2012, 12:12 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,175
|
|
23 January 2012, 12:54 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
I had a 3717 and loved it, get one. The only reason I sold mine was because I wanted the bracelet and I purchased one on a strap. IWC bracelets are so much money to just go buy one so I sold the watch. I would love to own another on a bracelet this time, it is one amazing watch.
__________________
My grails: |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.