ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Sixshooter · 23 April 2012, 10:03 AM

I have been eying the Daytona for quite some time now. Although, the AP Royal Oak has been catching my eye as of late. I would like something slightly more dressy than my Sub and Explorer, hence these 2 options.

I would go for a white dial on either model, and would even consider a Chronograph RO if the right deal came along. Either way I would be buying it from a dealer here or the like.

I love the Daytona, but the thought of branching out from Rolex excites me a bit, just something different. So, which way would you go?

dddrees · 23 April 2012, 10:05 AM

Both

agsstructures · 23 April 2012, 10:08 AM

I was in the same boat as you, the ROC ended up being out of my price range so it came down to the white dial royal oak and the daytona. Ended up with the daytona but either way you can't go wrong. Good luck!

dddrees · 23 April 2012, 10:24 AM

Honestly I don't think you can make a mistake with either. They are quite a bit different but both are appropriate for what you are looking for, even though I consider the 15300 a bit more dressier than the Daytona.

Remember the 15300 has been discontinued. Have you seen both in person, and tried both of them on yet?

Sixshooter · 23 April 2012, 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dddrees

Remember the 15300 has been discontinued. Have you seen both in person, and tried both of them on yet?

I haven't tried on the 15300, but have tried the daytona. I have read that the 39mm RO feels large, and to me the Daytona felt smaller than other 40mm's. Is this the general consensus? I'm just trying to see how the feel is on the wrist. I know I will have to try one on obviously, just looking for opinions!

Thank you to everyone for their help and opinions

drgleeds37 · 23 April 2012, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sixshooter

I haven't tried on the 15300, but have tried the daytona. I have read that the 39mm RO feels large, and to me the Daytona felt smaller than other 40mm's. Is this the general consensus? I'm just trying to see how the feel is on the wrist. I know I will have to try one on obviously, just looking for opinions!

Thank you to everyone for their help and opinions

The Royal Oak wears larger because of it's length more than it's width. The lugs and integrated bracelet make it too long for my 6.75 wrist. Ironically the Daytona being 1mm larger in width actually wears smaller than I generally like. It really depends on your wrist shape and your preference, either way they are both amazing watches!

-Daniel

Lanfor · 23 April 2012, 10:25 AM

I'd have to go AP on this one

ecsub44 · 23 April 2012, 10:29 AM

AP

Howie · 23 April 2012, 10:41 AM

I love the Daytona, and this is obviously a Rolex forum, however - the 15300 Royal Oak is really a work of art.

dddrees · 23 April 2012, 10:59 AM

Yes the Daytona wears smaller than most other 40mm watches. It's the design of the case and the fact it's not as thick as most other 40mm watches.

The 15300 wears bigger than most 39mm watches because of the thicknes of the case in combination of the bezel and bracelet design, but it still has a smaller presence than my my Daytona.

To rate one higher than the other is difficult because I own and love both although for different reasons.

The Daytona is a great watch and I love how it wears and looks.

The dial on the 15300 is awesome, and the finish and detail is amazing. The movement is awesome, and I do spend time looking at it every time I take it out to wear it.

Before deciding I would recomend trying them both on however. Some people may not like a 39mm watch. However the new AP will be along soon and it is going to be 41 mm I believe. I'm glad I got the 15300 however.

kilyung · 23 April 2012, 11:26 AM

I've got both:

White RO

White Daytona

Winner:

gwalker · 23 April 2012, 11:37 AM

I prefer the AP because a chronograph function is pretty useless and I need a date. I think the AP is better looking.

z0mghenry · 23 April 2012, 12:42 PM

I like both but the AP takes the cake here for me.

travisb · 23 April 2012, 07:08 PM

tomee · 23 April 2012, 07:17 PM

I own a 15300. Love it

HL65 · 23 April 2012, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomee

I own a 15300. Love it

Love that shot! As for OP--So different and only thing that matters is that you get the one that sings to you the most!

Bobble · 23 April 2012, 08:18 PM

I have a Daytona that I purchased not long ago and love it, it's a very personal thing and I haven't seen a 15300 in the flesh, but to me it just looks a bit 'blocky' as in the Daytona is the most comfortable watch I've worn due to all of the smooth and rounded edges.

It's your choice completely, just putting my 2p in

Fiery · 23 April 2012, 07:21 PM

If you already have 2 Rolex, then it's a no-brainer: go for the 'Oak

It's a very different watch to almost anything out there. It also wears different to "normal" watches, due to the lugs shape.

mikkemus23 · 23 April 2012, 07:29 PM

AP for me, but you can`t really do wrong in this case

capote · 23 April 2012, 08:02 PM

The 15300 is really nice. I prefer it to the Daytona. More versitile as well IMO.

danberger · 23 April 2012, 08:04 PM

AP but factor in their servicing costs (if that is an issue for you), albeit the way Rolex have recently increased theirs that may not be such a differential now

Adam K. · 23 April 2012, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by danberger

AP but factor in their servicing costs (if that is an issue for you), albeit the way Rolex have recently increased theirs that may not be such a differential now

The gap has definitely narrowed in the last couple years. Just had my 15300 fully overhauled (minus case refinishing) and my total was $872 + tax, bringing the whole bill to just over $900. Not cheap certainly, but not too horrible either considering the quality of Audemars Piguet, and how well you are treated as a "member of the family". Nor is the figure much higher than what many RSCs are charging for full overhaul...granted, Rolex includes the refinish in their charges, but still.

gwalker · 24 April 2012, 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by danberger

AP but factor in their servicing costs (if that is an issue for you), albeit the way Rolex have recently increased theirs that may not be such a differential now

The Daytona is going to be about the same as the AP. I'm almost positive a basic routine service is $800ish for either model.

beaglehusky · 23 April 2012, 08:08 PM

For something dressier, AP.

Elementa · 23 April 2012, 08:12 PM

Just to toss one more in the ring, the new white dial Patek Nautilus: http://articles.businessinsider.com/...-philippe-dial

It has me drooling . . .

iamblue03 · 23 April 2012, 11:36 PM

It's really up to you. I have a daytona, and I like AP ROOs as well. However, after thinking that I only wear one watch a day, a vintage tt dayjust and a daytona will be enough for me for a very long time.

Rollie2011 · 24 April 2012, 12:21 AM

Ap

TSW · 24 April 2012, 04:15 AM

Love both but if i had to choose....it would be the 15300

isherlock · 24 April 2012, 05:04 AM

15300 definitely dressier, but i think the daytona looks better on you

sarir97 · 24 April 2012, 05:15 AM

Maybe its just me, but I don't consider either to be a dress watch (though between the two, the AP is dressier). Perhaps you should consider something less bulky for your dress watch? A PP perhaps?

23 April 2012, 10:03 AM	#1
Sixshooter "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Caleb Location: Lubbock TX. USA Watch: Crude Prices Posts: 1,103	SS Daytona vs. AP RO 15300 I have been eying the Daytona for quite some time now. Although, the AP Royal Oak has been catching my eye as of late. I would like something slightly more dressy than my Sub and Explorer, hence these 2 options. I would go for a white dial on either model, and would even consider a Chronograph RO if the right deal came along. Either way I would be buying it from a dealer here or the like. I love the Daytona, but the thought of branching out from Rolex excites me a bit, just something different. So, which way would you go? __________________ - VC - AP - Rolex - Omega

23 April 2012, 10:24 AM	#4
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,251	Honestly I don't think you can make a mistake with either. They are quite a bit different but both are appropriate for what you are looking for, even though I consider the 15300 a bit more dressier than the Daytona. Remember the 15300 has been discontinued. Have you seen both in person, and tried both of them on yet? __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

23 April 2012, 10:25 AM	#7
Lanfor "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Matt Location: London Watch: Submariner-16610LV Posts: 1,798	I'd have to go AP on this one __________________ Rolex Submariner - 16610LV

23 April 2012, 10:29 AM	#8
ecsub44 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: US Watch: Sub Posts: 3,175	AP __________________ *侘寂 -- wabi-sabi --* acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44

23 April 2012, 10:59 AM	#10
dddrees "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2010 Real Name: Dan Location: USA Watch: This N That Posts: 34,251	Yes the Daytona wears smaller than most other 40mm watches. It's the design of the case and the fact it's not as thick as most other 40mm watches. The 15300 wears bigger than most 39mm watches because of the thicknes of the case in combination of the bezel and bracelet design, but it still has a smaller presence than my my Daytona. To rate one higher than the other is difficult because I own and love both although for different reasons. The Daytona is a great watch and I love how it wears and looks. The dial on the 15300 is awesome, and the finish and detail is amazing. The movement is awesome, and I do spend time looking at it every time I take it out to wear it. Before deciding I would recomend trying them both on however. Some people may not like a 39mm watch. However the new AP will be along soon and it is going to be 41 mm I believe. I'm glad I got the 15300 however. __________________ When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

23 April 2012, 10:08 AM	#3
agsstructures 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Brooklyn, NY Posts: 2,390	I was in the same boat as you, the ROC ended up being out of my price range so it came down to the white dial royal oak and the daytona. Ended up with the daytona but either way you can't go wrong. Good luck!

23 April 2012, 10:41 AM	#9
Howie "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: New York Posts: 1,036	I love the Daytona, and this is obviously a Rolex forum, however - the 15300 Royal Oak is really a work of art.

23 April 2012, 11:26 AM	#11
kilyung 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Cave Watch: Sundial Posts: 33,940	I've got both: White RO White Daytona Winner:

23 April 2012, 11:37 AM	#12
gwalker "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Gunter Location: AL/NJ Watch: DSSD; 116610LN Posts: 5,509	I prefer the AP because a chronograph function is pretty useless and I need a date. I think the AP is better looking.

23 April 2012, 12:42 PM	#13
z0mghenry "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: Henry Location: GA Posts: 617	I like both but the AP takes the cake here for me.

23 April 2012, 07:08 PM	#14
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,402	AP Royal Oak all day!

23 April 2012, 07:17 PM	#15
tomee "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 446	I own a 15300. Love it

23 April 2012, 08:18 PM	#17
Bobble Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Paul Location: Midlands UK Watch: GMT IIc, Daytona Posts: 423	I have a Daytona that I purchased not long ago and love it, it's a very personal thing and I haven't seen a 15300 in the flesh, but to me it just looks a bit 'blocky' as in the Daytona is the most comfortable watch I've worn due to all of the smooth and rounded edges. It's your choice completely, just putting my 2p in

23 April 2012, 07:21 PM	#18
Fiery "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Europe Watch: Sub-C 116610LN Posts: 2,649	If you already have 2 Rolex, then it's a no-brainer: go for the 'Oak It's a very different watch to almost anything out there. It also wears different to "normal" watches, due to the lugs shape. __________________ "In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)

23 April 2012, 07:29 PM	#19
mikkemus23 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Eirik Location: Norway Watch: Rolex/Omega/PAM Posts: 1,160	AP for me, but you can`t really do wrong in this case

23 April 2012, 08:02 PM	#20
capote "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: Daniel Location: Sweden Watch: 16570 Posts: 7,315	The 15300 is really nice. I prefer it to the Daytona. More versitile as well IMO.

23 April 2012, 08:04 PM	#21
danberger Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: England Posts: 500	AP but factor in their servicing costs (if that is an issue for you), albeit the way Rolex have recently increased theirs that may not be such a differential now

23 April 2012, 08:08 PM	#24
beaglehusky "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Adrian Location: Tanzania Posts: 1,553	For something dressier, AP.

23 April 2012, 08:12 PM	#25
Elementa "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Here and there Watch: Panerai, Rolex Posts: 289	Just to toss one more in the ring, the new white dial Patek Nautilus: http://articles.businessinsider.com/...-philippe-dial It has me drooling . . .

23 April 2012, 11:36 PM	#26
iamblue03 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: texas Posts: 20	It's really up to you. I have a daytona, and I like AP ROOs as well. However, after thinking that I only wear one watch a day, a vintage tt dayjust and a daytona will be enough for me for a very long time.

24 April 2012, 12:21 AM	#27
Rollie2011 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: John Location: Palm Beach, FL Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42 Posts: 1,654	Ap __________________ John Submariner C LN Explorer 42 Polar

24 April 2012, 04:15 AM	#28
TSW "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: TSW Location: Le Brassus Watch: Rolex & AP's Posts: 27,449	Love both but if i had to choose....it would be the 15300 __________________ AP Owners Club IG @swiss.watch.connection

24 April 2012, 05:04 AM	#29
isherlock "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Blaine, WA Posts: 33	15300 definitely dressier, but i think the daytona looks better on you

24 April 2012, 05:15 AM	#30
sarir97 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Mehrdad Location: Scottsdale, AZ Watch: Ω & Rolex Posts: 320	Maybe its just me, but I don't consider either to be a dress watch (though between the two, the AP is dressier). Perhaps you should consider something less bulky for your dress watch? A PP perhaps?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)