ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
19 July 2012, 03:12 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Mark
Location: uk Derbyshire
Posts: 434
|
Daytona size compared to Sub.
Has anyone got a picture of a Sub non date next to a Daytona, if you have would you please post it on here for me please I would like to try and compare the Daytona size wise to my Sub thanks guys.
|
19 July 2012, 03:32 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Both 40mm
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
19 July 2012, 06:23 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Mark
Location: uk Derbyshire
Posts: 434
|
|
19 July 2012, 07:14 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Rhode Island USA
Watch: 116610LN, 216570
Posts: 787
|
The Sub (ESPECIALLY a Sub C) feels much bigger even though they are both 40mm. The Sub is much thicker than a Daytona.
|
19 July 2012, 08:46 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Quote:
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
|
19 July 2012, 03:40 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Ricardo
Location: Brasil
Posts: 248
|
I had both, Submariner date and Daytona SS ( my sub was stollen). The sub looks bigger because the bezel color, IMO.
|
19 July 2012, 03:55 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
I think the Daytona wears a tad bigger than the 14060 even though they are the same size IMHO.
|
19 July 2012, 05:01 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
|
19 July 2012, 05:03 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: gary
Location: uk newcastle
Watch: SS Ceramic Sub
Posts: 504
|
|
19 July 2012, 04:46 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Mark
Location: uk Derbyshire
Posts: 434
|
Thanks guys, i am toying with the idea off making the Daytona my next purchase that or the LVC Sub.
|
19 July 2012, 07:38 AM | #11 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
|
Every time I tried on a Daytona (White) it felt very small compared to either 14060M or 16610LV...Kinda like a Explorer...but a tad smaller.
|
19 July 2012, 07:57 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,934
|
Had them both for some years (traded/flipped long ago). Either seemed alike to my eyes as they were rotated daily. I agree the white dialed Daytona seemed optically smaller than the TT Panda dial. Must be an illusion since all 3 were identical 40mm
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.