ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
16 January 2013, 06:14 AM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,454
|
Anyone Want to Weigh in on This Sub?
A friend of mine is interested in selling his TT Sub, so I was looking around ebay to see what they're going for these days.
I found this one that looks a little fishy. http://www.ebay.com/itm/ROLEX-SUBMAR...item53f2056f8b
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
16 January 2013, 06:19 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: ChrisTOPHer
Location: Sydney
Watch: Rolex, Brellum,
Posts: 12,601
|
Watch looks fine but I am concerned about sellers lack of knowledge of the watch, newer box and strange warranty card that isn't
p.s a decent one goes fir between 6 and 7.5k pre owned
__________________
"Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795 |
16 January 2013, 06:39 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Madrid (Spain)
Posts: 702
|
|
16 January 2013, 06:41 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: US
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 2,156
|
Date magnification certainly looks off. Could just be the angle of the pic. And shouldn't there be gold on the clasp too??
|
16 January 2013, 06:44 AM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Tyler
Location: Hill Country, TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 496
|
|
16 January 2013, 07:21 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
|
the clasp is correct for a non solid link band, older 16613 with lug holes no gold is in the centre of the old clasp, bezel insert is aftermarket and crystal is definetely aftermarket with poor magnification. I only believe date magnification to be relevant on new watches that should 100% have an original crystal, i personally can change it myself, so this does not bother me as used watches often have aftermarket glasses, easy to fix fairly cheap and should not be the final call if the price is right imho. i would need to see the clasp and relevant pictures of the movement to be sure on this one as no real points of reference are shown in the photos with enough clarity, box is incorrect for this watch
__________________
watches many |
16 January 2013, 07:24 AM | #7 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,858
|
Quote:
|
|
17 January 2013, 03:48 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: STAN
Location: KY-USA
Watch: Rolex Prez
Posts: 12,583
|
... X - 2 ...
Quote:
|
|
16 January 2013, 07:22 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,858
|
Gold through the clasp didn't start until the SEL bracelets.
I think the watch itself is genuine but with aftermarket parts. At a minimum, the bezel insert and crystal. Box and accessories do not match the vintage of the watch, of course. |
16 January 2013, 07:07 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ronnie
Location: Southeastern USA
Watch: Omega Seamaster PO
Posts: 3,872
|
Pearl surround, date font (date disc), date mag look suspect, IMO.
__________________
|
16 January 2013, 07:10 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Madrid (Spain)
Posts: 702
|
The best thing is the warranty card of the watch winder!!!
|
16 January 2013, 07:16 AM | #12 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,454
|
I say it's as phony as a three dollar bill.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
16 January 2013, 07:27 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Real Name: Steve-O
Location: Naplis, Merlin
Watch: Blue TT Sub
Posts: 857
|
Magnification looks off. Compare to this one.
__________________
|
16 January 2013, 09:04 AM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,454
|
Okay, this isn't the best picture of the clasp, but it's the best one on the site.
It looks iffy to me, but I don't have my Sub handy to compare the coronet, the scrolling, etc. There's no lettering that I can see. I added another picture and this shot looks even worse.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
16 January 2013, 09:09 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Montreal
Watch: The Habs pick 1st!
Posts: 3,589
|
The logo on the band blade looks bad.
|
16 January 2013, 09:25 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 21
|
Looks fake. Date is way too small
|
16 January 2013, 12:23 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: US
Posts: 2,707
|
|
16 January 2013, 02:07 PM | #18 | ||
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,454
|
Quote:
I know crown knows his stuff, but evidently the watch is not as advertised. These are crown's own words: Quote:
I would also note that the coronet on the crown looks suspicious, as well. So, if for no other reason than the edification of our members, I think the matter deserves another review.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
||
16 January 2013, 05:53 PM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,959
|
The juice isn't worth the squeeze - eBay won't pull it because of an aftermarket crystal or bezel insert - maybe an email to the seller will get you some movement pics + pics between the lugs.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
16 January 2013, 06:28 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Madrid (Spain)
Posts: 702
|
I really donīt know why this watch is getting so much latitude. Usually, a watch with an "aftermarket" crystal and an "aftermarket" insert would have been called fake. Even more when the seller does not mention it. Plus, the box is from a later period than the watch.
On top of that, the bracelet looks dubious to me. |
16 January 2013, 06:49 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
|
im no expert but the color looks a lil off to me...the blue looks faded and the gold is not shinny at all..
__________________
14060M SM300 PAM000 Poljot-BAIKAL G Shock |
16 January 2013, 07:06 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
|
No good.
Lot's of things wrong.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man. |
16 January 2013, 07:12 PM | #23 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,510
|
Not with a ten foot pole.
__________________
E |
16 January 2013, 07:13 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Melbourne
Watch: 16610, Tudor 1960
Posts: 1,554
|
|
16 January 2013, 11:28 PM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,454
|
Don't forget the watch winder warranty!
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
17 January 2013, 03:39 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Greg
Location: PA
Watch: me burn
Posts: 1,435
|
dont like it.
__________________
Motocross is life! |
17 January 2013, 03:57 AM | #27 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Richard
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,858
|
I can't believe the discussion has gone on for as long as it already has. Nobody in their right mind is going to pay $11k for it anyway. In good condition and without any questionable parts, I think you'd be looking at roughly half that amount.
|
17 January 2013, 12:35 PM | #28 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
at least the movement is likely gen by looking at the hands, dial looks good.
I agree with others, aftermarket bezel insert and cheap crystal at the least. the logo does look wrong on the clasp, but the coronet on the outside looks ok, anyways, modded, who knows whats been done to it inside. would only be worth 3-4k imo. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.