ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Dream99 · 18 April 2013, 07:08 AM

I came across this on the Omega Web site and fell off my chair when i checked the price in the Omega price list. Its a Platinum Deville Tourbillion 18 pieces made and costs a cool £200,910 ($306,359)...... but wait for it there's another version only 10 pieces (no photo) costing £241,480 ($368,222). Now wheres my plastic

The GMT Master · 18 April 2013, 07:12 AM

I saw this (or at least one of the other Omega tourbillons) in the Champs Elysee Omega boutique. Gorgeous piece, and the hands aren't actually hands - they're two rotating discs of sapphire. Pretty cool, eh?

JP Chestnut · 18 April 2013, 07:15 AM

I was all set to buy it, but it just doesn't have enough orange! Seriously though, it's nice to see Omega producing haute pieces.

capote · 19 April 2013, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP Chestnut

I was all set to buy it, but it just doesn't have enough orange!

In reality you would see a hairy wrist behind the watch, I'm not a big fan of see though watches.

111forza · 18 April 2013, 07:17 AM

Any one got the right time please cant tell on this watch ?

Dream99 · 18 April 2013, 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 111forza

Any one got the right time please cant tell on this watch ?

You don't need to know the time if you own this piece.

swatty · 18 April 2013, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 111forza

Any one got the right time please cant tell on this watch ?

Same here

T. Ferguson · 19 April 2013, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 111forza

Any one got the right time please cant tell on this watch ?

That's a lot to spend on a watch and have to ask other people for the time. Wait, silly me. I have my cell phone.

Dream99 · 20 April 2013, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by T. Ferguson

That's a lot to spend on a watch and have to ask other people for the time. Wait, silly me. I have my cell phone.

Very Funny, but very true, who needs a watch these days to tell the time

Dream99 · 18 April 2013, 07:22 AM

This looks stunning, Id love to see up close. Must be amazing in the flesh as all Omegas look far better than their web photos show them. One thing for sure, its very very unlikely that anyone else would have the same watch on as you in room full of watch people. The Ultimate in exclusivity I think

etp095 · 18 April 2013, 09:16 AM

No,even if I had Carlos slim type money.

CDNWatchNut · 18 April 2013, 11:58 AM

I can appreciate the exclusivity and horological aspect of it, but it really doesn't appeal to me aesthetically. So no for me.

MilgaussMan1 · 18 April 2013, 01:08 PM

i have a hard time telling time, so no

The GMT Master · 18 April 2013, 06:24 PM

Don't worry, folks, they do a non-skeletonised version too

beshannon · 18 April 2013, 10:10 PM

No

Shade · 18 April 2013, 10:56 PM

The time shown on the watch is 7:10. Presuming the inncer circle tells hours and outer circle tells minutes.

As stunning as it may look, I'd rather buy a house and some spare to buy Speedmaster, Sub, and Pam..

Dream99 · 19 April 2013, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shade

The time shown on the watch is 7:10. Presuming the inncer circle tells hours and outer circle tells minutes.

As stunning as it may look, I'd rather buy a house and some spare to buy Speedmaster, Sub, and Pam..

That's what i think the time is too. Very clever watch and just shows what Omega are capable of producing

kkwn98 · 19 April 2013, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shade

The time shown on the watch is 7:10. Presuming the inncer circle tells hours and outer circle tells minutes.

As stunning as it may look, I'd rather buy a house and some spare to buy Speedmaster, Sub, and Pam..

The time is 10:10. The hand you see in the innner dial is attached to the 1 minute tourbillon, so serves as a seconds hand.

It's a great watch, but if I wanted a central tourbillon, it would be the one produced by Beat Haldimann.

Dream99 · 20 April 2013, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kkwn98

The time is 10:10. The hand you see in the innner dial is attached to the 1 minute tourbillon, so serves as a seconds hand.

It's a great watch, but if I wanted a central tourbillon, it would be the one produced by Beat Haldimann.

Do you know you are right, its the second hand on the tourbillon. 10:10 its is, but what the date????

Shade · 18 April 2013, 10:56 PM

The time shown on the watch is 7:10. Presuming the inncer circle tells hours and outer circle tells minutes.

As stunning as it may look, I'd rather buy a house and some spare to buy Speedmaster, Sub, and Pam..

andromeda160 · 18 April 2013, 11:22 PM

no, it'd be a patek tourbillon for that money.

MichaelB_Can · 18 April 2013, 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dream99

You don't need to know the time if you own this piece.

Yeah if you can afford this piece , you can afford to have someone walk behind you randomly yelling out the time every 15min or so ! Lol😜👍

Mike B , Canada ⌚

MichaelB_Can · 18 April 2013, 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MichaelB_Can

Yeah if you can afford this piece , you can afford to pay someone to walk behind you randomly yelling out the time every 15min or so ! Lol😜👍

Mike B , Canada ⌚

Mike B , Canada ⌚

Rolexis · 19 April 2013, 12:04 AM

I rather a collection of old Rolex watches.

Vincent65 · 19 April 2013, 01:55 AM

no chance - not for me, sorry!

Dream99 · 19 April 2013, 06:55 AM

I'm not surprised by the response so far, it seems everyone except me seem to not want to buy this lovely watch even if money was no object.

Rashid.bk · 19 April 2013, 07:28 AM

It's a very beautiful watch but....No, for that price AP and Richard Mille get all my attention.

Walton · 21 April 2013, 01:42 PM

Yes! Where do I send the $100 I won on the scratch off gift from last Christmas?

18 April 2013, 09:16 AM	#11
etp095 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: rudolph Location: chicago burbs Posts: 2,026	No,even if I had Carlos slim type money. __________________ tt date circa 69' 5513 circa 81' ss sub w/date (z) pepsi gmt for dad(D) polar expy II(z) 1675 gmt circa 68' ladies datejust on jubilee for mom (z) sea dweller16600(M) SS Sub-C(g) Omega Planet Ocean,45.5 on mesh(2500D)

18 April 2013, 10:10 PM	#15
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	No __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

18 April 2013, 10:56 PM	#16
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	The time shown on the watch is 7:10. Presuming the inncer circle tells hours and outer circle tells minutes. As stunning as it may look, I'd rather buy a house and some spare to buy Speedmaster, Sub, and Pam.. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

18 April 2013, 10:56 PM	#20
Shade "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Norman Location: Jakarta Watch: All of 'em.. Posts: 2,926	The time shown on the watch is 7:10. Presuming the inncer circle tells hours and outer circle tells minutes. As stunning as it may look, I'd rather buy a house and some spare to buy Speedmaster, Sub, and Pam.. __________________ My collections.. Plus PAM 233, 232, 249 & PAM 417.

18 April 2013, 07:12 AM	#2
The GMT Master "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: England Posts: 8,150	I saw this (or at least one of the other Omega tourbillons) in the Champs Elysee Omega boutique. Gorgeous piece, and the hands aren't actually hands - they're two rotating discs of sapphire. Pretty cool, eh?

18 April 2013, 07:15 AM	#3
JP Chestnut Banned Join Date: May 2012 Location: Ann Arbor MI Watch: Rolex Ref 16600 Posts: 3,908	I was all set to buy it, but it just doesn't have enough orange! Seriously though, it's nice to see Omega producing haute pieces.

18 April 2013, 07:17 AM	#5
111forza "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: uk Posts: 2,665	Any one got the right time please cant tell on this watch ?

18 April 2013, 07:22 AM	#10
Dream99 Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Alan Location: Bristol. UK Posts: 621	This looks stunning, Id love to see up close. Must be amazing in the flesh as all Omegas look far better than their web photos show them. One thing for sure, its very very unlikely that anyone else would have the same watch on as you in room full of watch people. The Ultimate in exclusivity I think

18 April 2013, 11:58 AM	#12
CDNWatchNut "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Juan Location: Sherwood Park, Ab Watch: 114060 Posts: 1,509	I can appreciate the exclusivity and horological aspect of it, but it really doesn't appeal to me aesthetically. So no for me.

18 April 2013, 01:08 PM	#13
MilgaussMan1 Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Signapore Posts: 196	i have a hard time telling time, so no

18 April 2013, 06:24 PM	#14
The GMT Master "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: England Posts: 8,150	Don't worry, folks, they do a non-skeletonised version too

18 April 2013, 11:22 PM	#21
andromeda160 Banned Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Greg Location: michigan Watch: Rolex Oyster Posts: 4,046	no, it'd be a patek tourbillon for that money.

19 April 2013, 01:55 AM	#25
Vincent65 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Switzerland Posts: 14,298	no chance - not for me, sorry!

19 April 2013, 06:55 AM	#26
Dream99 Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Alan Location: Bristol. UK Posts: 621	I'm not surprised by the response so far, it seems everyone except me seem to not want to buy this lovely watch even if money was no object.

19 April 2013, 07:28 AM	#27
Rashid.bk "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Dallas Watch: 12800ft = 3900m Posts: 11,173	It's a very beautiful watch but....No, for that price AP and Richard Mille get all my attention.

21 April 2013, 01:42 PM	#28
Walton Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Philadelphia Posts: 134	Yes! Where do I send the $100 I won on the scratch off gift from last Christmas?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)