ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
27 May 2013, 03:06 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: So. California
Posts: 451
|
Help me understand pricing on the old v new Submariner
Am I missing something? I see for sale posts for the "old" 16610" that claim collector pieces, or priced the same as a used ceramic 11610. Why would anyone pay what they can buy a new ceramic model submariner for for an "old" style submariner
Are the older models really collector pieces when there were so many produced? (I am speaking of the F-V serial) Is anyone actually getting ceramic prices for the non ceramic one? I just do not understand the thought process. |
27 May 2013, 03:11 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Wayne
Location: California
Watch: Rolex, PAM
Posts: 3,302
|
All the 16610 I have seen are priced well below the 116610. Except for some 16610LV models.
|
27 May 2013, 03:13 AM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,904
|
No 16610 will be a collectors piece IMHO
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
27 May 2013, 05:30 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BIG BEAR, CA
Posts: 1,468
|
|
27 May 2013, 03:13 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
If you are looking for a bnib piece you will pay a premium. It is what it is.
|
27 May 2013, 04:41 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Watch: Out!
Posts: 298
|
I am not a fan of the ceramic subs and wanted a 16610. I found a NIB piece here from a TS and bought it. I got a new piece cheaper than going to an AD and I didn't have to settle for something I really didn't like.
__________________
Citizen BL5250-02L & AT0100-51A Casio G-Shock GW6900-1 Seiko SKX007 & SRP313K2 Omega SMP 2254.50 Rolex Submariner 16610 |
27 May 2013, 03:30 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
Agree with above.
|
27 May 2013, 03:52 AM | #8 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
Quote:
random ser#, blue hairsprings in old cases, lv's will always be a bit of a premium but not the other 10 million imo. |
|
27 May 2013, 04:29 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
|
It's because there are many, like me, who do not like the look of the ceramic ones. Some of the 16610's I see for sale are in better condition than the used 116610's.
|
27 May 2013, 05:07 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 4,220
|
There is no reason a standard 16610 in decent shape should cost any more than $5,000 unless it is BNIB with stickers. I know, I know the market stimulates demand but people paying any more for a used piece that cost 5k or less when purchased new is just silly to me.
There is some kind of lore that LVs are rare and because they are loved (rightfully so) on this forum people ask absurd prices and people pay them. That's their prerogative. |
27 May 2013, 05:39 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Paul
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 307
|
There's a seller on Kijiji Canada right now, with a 20 year old 16610, no boxes/papers, or service history, and he's asking $6000. It's been there for about 18 months now, and I'm sure will be there for another 18.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.