The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 September 2013, 12:34 AM   #1
AshM
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bronxville
Posts: 3
Brand New Explorer II losing 2.2+ secs a day. Concerned?

Hi
I'm new to this forum and grateful for it.
I just brought my first Rolex on Tuesday from Tourneau in NYC - a brand new Explorer II Polar - and have until Monday to return it for store credit. According to the Twixt app on my iPhone it's losing 2.2 secs a day. I understand that this is a mechanical watch - not the atomic Casio I had be wearing that resets every night - but I was wondering if this is normal for a new Rolex Superlative Chronometer?
Why do I care? It's not the end of the world, but I walk to the train every day to commute and my watch tells my whether I can keep walking or need to start running. 15 seconds a week wont make or break, but 13 minutes a year would. Maybe I just need to get used to a mechanical watch? Do you think it deteriorate further? I think I read somewhere that watches tend to get slower as they age - like the rest of us.
Thanks for your expert opinion.
AshM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 12:53 AM   #2
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,041
All Swiss movements of Rolex size are tested to the Swiss COSC standard which is the the movement should perform to a AVERAGE of between -4 to +6 seconds over any 24 hour period.And don't read to much in the the wording "Superlative" in front of the official designation of Chronometer,as today IMHO its merely a Rolex marketing ploy to give it a more distinguished sound to the chronometer status of their products. Any words added before or after the official designation of Chronometer are merely purely marketing,likewise the wording Certified Chronometer,is a redundant phrase word, since getting the Chronometer status is the certification,but the certification is only at the time of testing the bare un-cased movement.And all chronometers of the same size as Rolex movements are tested to exactly the same standard as any other certified movement of the same size as Rolex.

Now your watch is running well inside the COSC standard,now have you given your watch a full manual wind if not do so 40 full crown turns clockwise only.Now in general as the movement beds in to your wearing habits over a few weeks or so they speed up slightly. But even now your watch is showing over 99.997% accuracy remember there are 86400 seconds in a day.And no purely mechanical watch any brand at any price will keep perfect time close yes but perfect no.So just enjoy your watch and don't worry about a second or so out of the 86400 in a day as its very easy to reset the time say once a week even then it will be just 16 seconds slow. .
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 01:01 AM   #3
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by AshM View Post
I was wondering if this is normal for a new Rolex Superlative Chronometer?
Yes
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 01:11 AM   #4
supernova
"TRF" Member
 
supernova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Europe/Asia
Watch: AP/Rolex
Posts: 1,345
Lose 13 mins a year? Do you realize how accurate that is? There's alot of minutes in a year!
supernova is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 01:13 AM   #5
Cc1966
"TRF" Member
 
Cc1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Christopher
Location: Georgia, USA
Watch: ing the Sea...
Posts: 6,713
Icon2

Use time.gov to test accuracy (or a similar site)
__________________

"I wish to have no Connection with any Ship that does not Sail fast for I intend to go in harm's way."
Captain John Paul Jones, 16 November 1778
"Curmudgeons " Favorites: 1665 SD, Sub Date, DSSD, Exp II, Sub LV, GMTIIc
Cc1966 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 04:55 AM   #6
TempoKing
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by supernova View Post
Lose 13 mins a year? Do you realize how accurate that is? There's alot of minutes in a year!

13 minutes seems high...more like... less than 3 minutes perhaps
TempoKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 10:24 AM   #7
adsusanto
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: You tell me...
Location: Earth
Watch: too many....
Posts: 197
You kidding me right... That is still bloody accurate for a mechanical. Surely you not expecting it to beat a quartz?? I think any mechanical working around +_ 5 is damn good....I will only worry if it goes to 10 or more....But it's no big deal, you can always regulate them.
adsusanto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 01:10 AM   #8
Annan
"TRF" Member
 
Annan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
You will receive lots of comments as to accuracy, some as to how to check it and some as to whether to worry about it at all. For what it's worth, here are my thoughts:

Rolex specs (COSC) are -4 to plus 6 seconds/day so at -2.2 secs/day you are within specs. Therefore, no concerns as far as you know at this point.

You can do one of two things to truly assess the accuracy: (1) take it to an AD or a reputable watchmaker (Rolex certified is best) and have them use a special instrument to take a read of the accuracy. If not good have them regulate your watch. (2) check the accuracy yourself. Once again, you will get tons of advice but here's what I do:

1. Use a reputable reference source such as time.gov or time.is
2. Make sure your watch is fully wound, giving it about 40 turns once a week.
3. Wear it 24/7
4. Each day, for at least 10 days, compare it to your reference source at the same time each day and note the difference. Do not make any changes.
5. At the end of 10 days note the total variance and divide by 10. That gives you the average gain/loss per day.
6. If the average is outside the COSC specs or simply not good enough for you, have your watch regulated. It's your watch and you should be happy.

I recently did the above on my DJ and determined it was +6 secs/day. I took it to a certified Rolex watchmaker who checked it on an instrument and he verified I was correct. He regulated my DJ and it's now +1 sec/day.

Just yesterday I got a brand new 216570 myself and started the above process today. Good luck!
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time
Annan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 01:20 AM   #9
Sous
"TRF" Member
 
Sous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Paul
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 307
I'm not going to pile on with everyone questioning your concern about accuracy, AshM.

When I bought my 116200 Datejust in April this year, it was gaining 3.5 seconds per day. As of this past Sunday, it's down to +1.4 seconds per day. And as I understand it, that might change again, as the movement settles into my wearing habits, which is only about 12--14 hours per day.

Watch your watch, and I'm fairly certain that it too will settle into your wearing habits, and you'll see a change in accuracy.

I'll repeat what Padi56 has stated in the past--as long as your watch is consistent, meaning it consistently gains or loses the same amount daily, you've got an accurate movement.
Sous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 01:20 AM   #10
toshman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: California
Watch: Polar EXP II
Posts: 80
My watch is over a week old and is running +2/day... Not very concerned... if anything I'm playing around with overnight positioning of the watch to see if it will self regulate.
toshman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 02:02 AM   #11
Rabbithitthetree
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Singapore
Watch: GMT 116710BLNR
Posts: 35
I have been wearing my new GMT 116710BLNR for about 2 months already. Wear it everyday and since unbox till now it is showing about -2/day. Pretty consistent, but no sign of it "settling into my wearing habit"....
Rabbithitthetree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 02:08 AM   #12
DCheeta
"TRF" Member
 
DCheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
13 minutes a year? Why wouldn't you re-set it weekly or monthly?

Enjoy your polar 216570! I love mine.
DCheeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 02:34 AM   #13
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
Give your watch around 6 weeks to 'break' in.
If it's still running slow, go to a good AD and ask them to regulate it to the plus side.
Always better having a watch running too fast than too slow.
bondtoys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 02:44 AM   #14
Presa canary
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Justin
Location: Pa
Watch: Explorer ii
Posts: 3,152
Just wear it and enjoy it. There's nothing wrong with it. How about throwing up a pic or two of that thing? By the way, welcome
Presa canary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:43 AM   #15
Lgear080
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
You purchased what many consider to be an amazing watch from arguably
The most highly regarded brand in the world. Please do not focus on the
Minutiae. Your watch is running incredibly well. I have a feeling you actually
Regret the expenditure itself, so you're finding reasons to justify a return.

For that, you'll have to look elsewhere.
Lgear080 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 03:59 AM   #16
BlueHeron
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 425
Don't feel badly about your question. I recently went through the entire education myself regarding mechanical watches, and had the same reaction you did upon wearing my Submariner for a few days and seeing too much gain in 24 hours -- I freaked out, proving what a novice I was and still am. As many have said in this thread, these watches actually do break in, and mine is now about +3 and trending in the right direction.

When you consider that the power supply in automatic / mechanical watches is nothing more than the movement of one's wrist throughout the day, and that a mechanical watch has hundreds of very small component parts, the achievement of the -4/+6 standard is almost spiritual...
BlueHeron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 04:04 AM   #17
Brandon(phila)
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Phila burbs
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 755
How the heck are you people figuring our 2.2 ...1.4...etc

Depending how you rest the watch at night may change it to speed up or slow down...face up, face down, crown up...or maybe you wear it sleeping.

As time goes on...weeks...months...or years from now it will change all the time with a mechanical watch...a year from now it may be running 3 sec fast

At 2.2 your watch is extremely accurate, so every other month when you are advancing the date - just set it 1 min fast...then you won't miss that train
Brandon(phila) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 04:29 AM   #18
ecsub44
"TRF" Member
 
ecsub44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon(phila) View Post
How the heck are you people figuring our 2.2 ...1.4...etc
OP stated using the "Twixt app".
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete

Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44
ecsub44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 05:46 AM   #19
AshM
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bronxville
Posts: 3
Icon14

Thanks I appreciate the replies, very helpful. Good to know about the variability, what qualifies as a chronometer, other folks' experience with the same watch, that new watches take time to settle, and that I should give it a wind.
I really like the watch. They have a huge variety at the Rolex branded Tourneau NYC store (Madison & 53rd if you ever get the chance) and I tried on a ton. Before going in I thought I would likely go for a Sub, maybe a Date Just II, but I travel for work and was then leaning to the GMT II. I tried on the Polar Explorer II as a lark and couldn't believe how much I liked it, and I don't really need three time zones so . . .
I also really liked the White Gold President II 218239 with the Silver Stick Dial (the understated elegance and the President bracelet, wow) but will have to save that for another time . . . hopefully.
On an interesting note, this is U.N. week in NY. One of the biggest volume weeks at the Rolex store. Why? Some of the diplomatic corps get a visa to bring over another diplomat (i.e. "personal shopper") who goes around to stores with a list and a briefcase full of cash to buy whatever they fancy. The Rolex store is ha prime destination and lots of "diplomats" have been in this week buying. So if there was ever a concern about the global appeal of a Rolex or the power of the brand . . . there are no worries on that front.
AshM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 06:17 AM   #20
Rebel
"TRF" Member
 
Rebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,241
I have a Casio that is spot on with the Atomic Clock, sundial in the backyard and weather channel. However, I prefer my Tudor Submariner even though it runs a little fast. I'm just ribbing you the OP a bit. Enjoy your new watch and wear it in health!
__________________
-------------------------------
Member of the Nylon Nation
Rebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 06:34 AM   #21
Grey.Coupe
"TRF" Member
 
Grey.Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 555
Set it two minutes fast once a month, or send it to me...
Grey.Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 08:01 AM   #22
ecsub44
"TRF" Member
 
ecsub44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: US
Watch: Sub
Posts: 3,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grey.Coupe View Post
Set it two minutes fast once a month, or send it to me...
Actually, set it 1 minute fast once a month...then you'll be 1 minute behind at the end of the month. Never more than +/- 1 minute.
__________________
侘 寂 -- wabi-sabi -- acceptance of transience and imperfection by finding beauty in that which is imperfect, impermanent, and incomplete

Commissioner of WEIRD POLICE , Badge # ecsub44
ecsub44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 07:52 AM   #23
TimeOnMyHands
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: 16570
Posts: 457
Welcome!

And as far as being concerned, I am concerned that you are concerned...
TimeOnMyHands is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 08:10 AM   #24
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
Seems fine to me


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 September 2013, 09:00 AM   #25
simongpaez
"TRF" Member
 
simongpaez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Simon
Location: Houston
Watch: Some
Posts: 1,109
If less than 3 seconds a day is an issue , I don't know any mechanical watch that will do it, I wouldn't worry about it.
simongpaez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2013, 05:08 PM   #26
Steve748
"TRF" Member
 
Steve748's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Steve
Location: San Diego
Watch: GMT2c & LVc
Posts: 220
I have had two GMT2c and both of them were losing a second or two a day and they had not been serviced.
My current one is an '07 and I have just had it serviced and on my wrist it loses about half a second a day.
But when I lay it flat, face up overnight it gains about a second so I have managed to keep it -/+ a second a day by taking it off every other night or every 2nd night.
Steve748 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 September 2013, 05:22 PM   #27
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,502
All my Rolex watches keep exact time to the second.
I have noticed that they are more accurate that some of the atomic clocks I have checked.
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 04:44 AM   #28
OrangeSport
"TRF" Member
 
OrangeSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: Essex, UK
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 2,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
All my Rolex watches keep exact time to the second.
I have noticed that they are more accurate that some of the atomic clocks I have checked.
__________________
OrangeSport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 02:43 AM   #29
Nidal
"TRF" Member
 
Nidal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC LV
Posts: 1,821
COSC is -4, +6 seconds a day. you are within norm. You have a perfect watch
Nidal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 September 2013, 03:04 AM   #30
djays
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 3
If 2.2 seconds really bothers you that much... I am sorry to tell you that... mechanical watch is simply not your cup of tea!
djays is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.