ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
30 December 2013, 12:15 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Adnan
Location: NoVA
Posts: 458
|
Your thoughts/opinions on the PAM 512 please
I'm interested in the 512, while I know that Panerais are considered sports watches in general I'm looking for a dressier 'dress casual' watch & I think the 512 fits the bill. Do others agree?
Also, what's a good discount as a recently introduced PAM from an AD? Thanks in advance! |
30 December 2013, 01:15 PM | #2 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 SubLV41 sponsor & Boutique Seller
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 52,713
|
i used to have it and sold it. The case is very thin and light. It's very nice dress watch when you wear it the original black leather straps (not assolutamente straps like i did) :
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=307327
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active Instagram @takuyawatches |
30 December 2013, 01:42 PM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Adnan
Location: NoVA
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
|
|
30 December 2013, 07:05 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jay
Location: Canada
Watch: 116520/PAM/PO2500
Posts: 293
|
For me the 512 is great as a dress watch.
__________________
116520 - 16570 - 16610LV - 16710pepsi - 116234 |
5 January 2014, 01:53 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Adnan
Location: NoVA
Posts: 458
|
|
5 January 2014, 03:52 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jay
Location: Canada
Watch: 116520/PAM/PO2500
Posts: 293
|
I have a slender 6.5 wrist, but you know what they say; It's not size, it's thickness that matters... Oh wait, that is thickness
__________________
116520 - 16570 - 16610LV - 16710pepsi - 116234 |
30 December 2013, 07:43 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: uk
Posts: 27
|
it's stunning
i have it's bigger brother the 514, but i think the 512 looks better, it's just too small on my wrists |
30 December 2013, 08:00 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: SLF41
Location: Spain
Watch: Changes
Posts: 1,053
|
I would Love to have one ... Just admired yesterday in a window in Basel. ImageUploadedByTapatalk1388397632.422912.jpg
Sent with iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Sea Dweller 16600, Submariner 14060m SUB 5513 meter first (1968) Air King 5500 (1980) GMTc NR, Explorer 1 & II 14270 & 16570 PP 5065a |
30 December 2013, 08:31 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jay
Location: Canada
Watch: 116520/PAM/PO2500
Posts: 293
|
The crown winds like butter...
__________________
116520 - 16570 - 16610LV - 16710pepsi - 116234 |
31 December 2013, 12:44 AM | #10 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐2024 SubLV41 sponsor & Boutique Seller
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Thanh Takuya
Location: Dont mess w Texas
Watch: AP/Rolex/PP
Posts: 52,713
|
__________________
2 Factor Authentication Security Active Instagram @takuyawatches |
30 December 2013, 10:07 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,658
|
I have a bug for one of these, just waiting for the local AD to get one in stock so I can see it in the flesh before pulling the trigger. I really like the new Radiomir 1950 case. The Thin 42mm case works for me. No wire lugs. Yay!!! I just wish they used the quick release system or screw bars instead of spring bars.
__________________
Adam |
5 January 2014, 01:58 AM | #12 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,511
|
Quote:
Agreed. I can't stand wire lugs since I am born with 2 left hands = scratches! |
|
31 December 2013, 07:36 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Penna
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,658
|
I tried on on at the Panerai boutique in NYC. It was too small I have 6.5 inch wrist and was disappointed at the size. A 42mm would have been perfect. The 47mm one is too big. Instead I am getting a Pam 510.
__________________
Rolex Sub-126610LV Rolex Sub- 126613LB Rolex GMT BLRO 126710 Rolex GMT BLNR Rolex Datejust 16220 |
31 December 2013, 08:06 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,658
|
The 512 is 42mm.
http://www.panerai.com/en/watch-coll...-1940-pam00512 So it's still too small for your liking? My wrist is a touch under 6 3/4" and think the 42mm Radiomir 1940 case would be perfect for me.
__________________
Adam |
31 December 2013, 08:09 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Penna
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 1,658
|
Quote:
Sorry. You are correct. I meant a 44mm would have been perfect. I prefer a little larger watch. I think the fact that the 512 is so thin makes it seem smaller than it is. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Rolex Sub-126610LV Rolex Sub- 126613LB Rolex GMT BLRO 126710 Rolex GMT BLNR Rolex Datejust 16220 |
|
5 January 2014, 04:03 AM | #16 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,242
|
Except for the ecru lume, I really like it.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.