ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex40mm · 8 January 2014, 03:34 PM

Hey guys, i was just wondering how come Rolex doesn't make the explorers in gold. I figure that both the Explorers would look awesome in precious metals, but Rolex had chosen to keep them on the sporty side. They are in essence the Rolex tool that doesn't get dressy. I can understand how the idea wouldn't be practical for a Milgauss, but why do you guys think this had not happened (yet)?

T. Ferguson · 8 January 2014, 03:50 PM

I'll take a stab at it. Rolex probably figures they wouldn't sell well enough to be worth the time and money. While the Exp2 has been well received, sales of it and the Explorer are probably a few notches down from the Big 3: Sub/GMT/Daytona and I don't see that many of these in precious either. Even the GMT only comes in YG. And in the case of the Explorer you're not even getting a date function for that kind of money.

Given this, anyone looking to part with the kind of money commanded for a precious metal Rolex would probably be more interested in the one of these before considering one of the Explorers. Not to mention the DD, DD2, and the Sky Dweller.

Kind of like how many people buy the gold DJ when the DD is available for a "few" thousand more?

TT might be an interesting idea on the Explorers though.

zama · 8 January 2014, 07:32 PM

Mike has not asked for one ..........

Ste_J · 8 January 2014, 07:56 PM

A gold Exp II 42mm would be a grail watch for me if the finish was all brushed like the steel. Don't think it will ever happen but can live in hope!

Auragentum · 9 January 2014, 04:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zama

Mike has not asked for one ..........

Passionata · 8 January 2014, 08:44 PM

my wish was the 14060M in YG
never happened.

Cru Jones · 8 January 2014, 09:16 PM

considering that these days if one pays enough, one can climb to the top of everest, i guess a gold explorer would be fitting. personally, i don't see the point.

HL65 · 8 January 2014, 09:22 PM

Don't see it happening. Rolex has been making gold Subs, GMT's, and Daytona's for decades and never offered EXP in gold. Don't think there would be much demand outside of Mike. For me....No interest-sorry.

AK797 · 8 January 2014, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan65

... Don't think there would be much demand outside of Mike. For me....No interest-sorry.

Love how matter of factly you delivered this, Ken

SixPak · 9 January 2014, 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteelerFan65

Don't see it happening......Don't think there would be much demand outside of Mike. For me....No interest-sorry.

Hilarious!

dysondiver · 8 January 2014, 09:37 PM

i guess the datjust has that base more or less covered, i actually really like the all gold datejust , just simple style. although i am warming more to the day date.
guess its an age thing.

beshannon · 9 January 2014, 03:47 AM

No interest in a tool watch being made of precious metal

GradyPhilpott · 9 January 2014, 04:02 AM

It's utter blasphemy to even think of an Explorer in precious metals and just as much so for the Submariner.

Although the 114060 is a fine looking watch, I think it would have been perfectly appropriate for Rolex to have refused to update the 14060M any further, except for the upgraded movement in the later models.

As for the Explorer not being dressy, I think that the Explorer is a pretty dressy watch, especially the 114270.

Some things are just sacred, or at least. they should be.

Fiery · 9 January 2014, 06:54 AM

I think the Explorers are perfect to stay as SS only. We will much sooner see a WG GMT or even a Pt Sub before the arrival of any precious metal Explorers.

8 January 2014, 03:34 PM	#1
Rolex40mm Banned Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 373	Gold Explorers ? Hey guys, i was just wondering how come Rolex doesn't make the explorers in gold. I figure that both the Explorers would look awesome in precious metals, but Rolex had chosen to keep them on the sporty side. They are in essence the Rolex tool that doesn't get dressy. I can understand how the idea wouldn't be practical for a Milgauss, but why do you guys think this had not happened (yet)?

8 January 2014, 03:50 PM	#2
T. Ferguson "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Left Coast Posts: 7,025	I'll take a stab at it. Rolex probably figures they wouldn't sell well enough to be worth the time and money. While the Exp2 has been well received, sales of it and the Explorer are probably a few notches down from the Big 3: Sub/GMT/Daytona and I don't see that many of these in precious either. Even the GMT only comes in YG. And in the case of the Explorer you're not even getting a date function for that kind of money. Given this, anyone looking to part with the kind of money commanded for a precious metal Rolex would probably be more interested in the one of these before considering one of the Explorers. Not to mention the DD, DD2, and the Sky Dweller. Kind of like how many people buy the gold DJ when the DD is available for a "few" thousand more? TT might be an interesting idea on the Explorers though. __________________ *Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.*

8 January 2014, 07:32 PM	#3
zama "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Craig Location: Sydney Watch: 4 Broken glass Posts: 5,807	Mike has not asked for one .......... __________________ Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed..... Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze

8 January 2014, 08:44 PM	#6
Passionata "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: N/A Watch: the girls Posts: 7,095	my wish was the 14060M in YG never happened. __________________ Best George "Also remember that feet don't get fat and a watch will always speak volumes." Robert Johnston --------------------- newhttps://youtu.be/EljAF-uddhE new http://youtu.be/ZmpLoO1Q8eQ IG @passionata1

8 January 2014, 09:22 PM	#8
HL65 TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Ken Location: SW Florida Watch: One on my wrist. Posts: 63,985	Don't see it happening. Rolex has been making gold Subs, GMT's, and Daytona's for decades and never offered EXP in gold. Don't think there would be much demand outside of Mike. For me....No interest-sorry. __________________ *SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT*

8 January 2014, 07:56 PM	#4
Ste_J "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Ste Location: Merseyside Posts: 380	A gold Exp II 42mm would be a grail watch for me if the finish was all brushed like the steel. Don't think it will ever happen but can live in hope!

8 January 2014, 09:16 PM	#7
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,243	considering that these days if one pays enough, one can climb to the top of everest, i guess a gold explorer would be fitting. personally, i don't see the point.

8 January 2014, 09:37 PM	#11
dysondiver "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: tom Location: northern ireland Watch: my fins Posts: 10,063	i guess the datjust has that base more or less covered, i actually really like the all gold datejust , just simple style. although i am warming more to the day date. guess its an age thing.

9 January 2014, 03:47 AM	#12
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	No interest in a tool watch being made of precious metal __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

9 January 2014, 04:02 AM	#13
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK050 Posts: 34,447	It's utter blasphemy to even think of an Explorer in precious metals and just as much so for the Submariner. Although the 114060 is a fine looking watch, I think it would have been perfectly appropriate for Rolex to have refused to update the 14060M any further, except for the upgraded movement in the later models. As for the Explorer not being dressy, I think that the Explorer is a pretty dressy watch, especially the 114270. Some things are just sacred, or at least. they should be. __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

9 January 2014, 06:54 AM	#14
Fiery "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Europe Watch: Sub-C 116610LN Posts: 2,649	I think the Explorers are perfect to stay as SS only. We will much sooner see a WG GMT or even a Pt Sub before the arrival of any precious metal Explorers. __________________ "In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)