The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 April 2014, 08:55 PM   #1
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
Can these two Royal Oaks co-exist?




The Jumbo 15202 vs the RO 15400. In the same collection that is. I ever thought about flipping my 15400 for the Jumbo since the theory goes that the Jumbo is a more authentic and superior version of the two ROs and keeping the 15400 after acquiring the Jumbo will be redandunt. But now having compared them many times, I think they are actually rather different. The 15400 is probably concieved as a beefier and sportier version of the original RO while the Jumbo with its thin profile and elegant looks is considerably dressier. While arguable, I also think the 15400 has a newer / more advance movement and a more robust case design.

So I think they can complement each other. Or am I off track? So what are your thoughts?
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2014, 09:07 PM   #2
FeelingTheBlues
"TRF" Member
 
FeelingTheBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
They are quite similar indeed (more than, for instance, the 5167 and 5711 when it comes to Patek...I say that because of the same type of threads we've seen on the PP forum and in which I usually say that they can co-exist), the size and thickness may be different but the overall design is pretty much the same. However, I still do think that in a collection they could be next to each other and fit very well because of some small differences and, mostly, because they are both pretty different models historically and even within the very brand that produces them.

If I had to sell one it would probably be the 15400 but I still think you can keep both without having a very redundant duo.
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir,
Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire,
J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout,
On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout.


- André Fortin
FeelingTheBlues is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2014, 09:55 PM   #3
Fiery
"TRF" Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
Different size, different dial, different movement. Why wouldn't they coexist? Not to go too much off-topic, but many guys have a black and a green Sub-C as well, or a Sub ND and a Sub Date. If those very similar pairs can find their places in a collection, then a 15202 and a 15400 should do as well.
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)
Fiery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2014, 10:06 PM   #4
orangedial
"TRF" Member
 
orangedial's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Wayne
Location: Singapore
Watch: AP, PP, Rolex
Posts: 1,791
I believe they CAN co-exist, since both of them wear very differently due to different case size, width, height, and therefore wrist presence. With a 15202 in blue dial, 15400 in white and your Diver ROO in black dial, you will have a perfect RO trio!
orangedial is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 11:11 AM   #5
Hairdude1
"TRF" Member
 
Hairdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Chicago
Watch: AP,PP, Rolex
Posts: 37,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by orangedial View Post
I believe they CAN co-exist, since both of them wear very differently due to different case size, width, height, and therefore wrist presence. With a 15202 in blue dial, 15400 in white and your Diver ROO in black dial, you will have a perfect RO trio!
This!
Hairdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2014, 11:06 PM   #6
s14roller
"TRF" Member
 
s14roller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
I think they can, but in a lot of ways would be like owning both a black and green sub.
s14roller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2014, 11:26 PM   #7
kilyung
"TRF" Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,943
I recall in my younger days having two girlfriends... Both very different yet equally attractive. Didn't work out so well.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 02:20 PM   #8
BNA/LION
2025 Pledge Member
 
BNA/LION's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by kilyung View Post
I recall in my younger days having two girlfriends... Both very different yet equally attractive. Didn't work out so well.
HA, Me too! But the watches will just have to deal with you like they did me. Just be as fair as you can with wrist time...
__________________

✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->?
Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron.
BNA/LION is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 April 2014, 11:34 PM   #9
Baco Noir
"TRF" Member
 
Baco Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 5,000
It'd be kind of like owning a Sub and a SubC, which people do, but at least you have different dial colors. Personally, I'd keep one and flip the other the provide more variety in my collection.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 126619LB, 116710BLNR, and 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster and Planet Ocean 42; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Nomos Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & SuperOcean 44; Doxa 300 Pro Carbon; Stowa Limette; Laco Napa Flieger; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too
Baco Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 12:12 AM   #10
texex91
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: .
Posts: 17,898
Of course!!
texex91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 12:18 AM   #11
martinr
"TRF" Member
 
martinr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: California
Posts: 3,108
I bought the 15400 first. Once I got the Jumbo I didn't wear the 15400 so I moved it. I don't have any regrets. Both great watches though.
martinr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 12:25 AM   #12
Cru Jones
2025 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 35,535
if one's collection/watch budget is large enough, sure, why not, but, these wouldn't be my only two watches.
Cru Jones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 12:55 AM   #13
laphroaig007
"TRF" Member
 
laphroaig007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Marc
Location: France
Watch: 116710 & PAM372
Posts: 1,027
Keep both, as different watches as between Submariner 1680 and Submariner 116610. IMHO.
__________________
Always look on the bright side of life... Watch addict...
laphroaig007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 01:31 AM   #14
thomaspp
"TRF" Member
 
thomaspp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
Cool picture. I personally wouldn't hold on to both as they are too similar in my mind and would replace one with a diver or something else. Best.
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous
thomaspp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 02:01 AM   #15
B. Doggy
"TRF" Member
 
B. Doggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
I'll be the odd man out here. I think it would be an either or scenario.
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega
B. Doggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 02:19 AM   #16
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
I agree the 400 is more modern and more muscular, as I like my APs, and the silver dial is unique and striking, so I would suggest trading the Jumbo for a blue Nautilus, that would be the combo for me.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 02:34 AM   #17
wisguy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,406
Keep the jumbo only
__________________
5230G / 5146G / 124060 / BB58 / '59 Constellation
wisguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 02:44 AM   #18
eamonn345
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: London
Watch: AP 15400 blue dial
Posts: 339
My view is that they are too similiar. See the pic below of my 15400 next to the 15202


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
eamonn345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 03:09 AM   #19
theseira
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Hidden
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 161
If I have a 15202 and 15400 in the same collection , id sell 15400 + cash for a pp5711.
theseira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 10:01 AM   #20
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
Thanks for all your insights. Just to clarify, I have not got the Jumbo yet. The Jumbo in the pic above belongs to my friend. I am thinking now of buying the Jumbo while still keeping the 15400.
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 10:43 AM   #21
Baco Noir
"TRF" Member
 
Baco Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 5,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by benlee View Post
Thanks for all your insights. Just to clarify, I have not got the Jumbo yet. The Jumbo in the pic above belongs to my friend. I am thinking now of buying the Jumbo while still keeping the 15400.
I'm all for variety between brands, dial colors and functions. These are very similar watches and for "my collection" would be too close in style to one another. Give the 15202 some more thought and if it's the one that speaks to you, flip the 15400 for it and use the extra cash in the watch fund for another watch.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 126619LB, 116710BLNR, and 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster and Planet Ocean 42; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Nomos Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & SuperOcean 44; Doxa 300 Pro Carbon; Stowa Limette; Laco Napa Flieger; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too
Baco Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 07:37 PM   #22
El118
"TRF" Member
 
El118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baco Noir View Post
I'm all for variety between brands, dial colors and functions. These are very similar watches and for "my collection" would be too close in style to one another. Give the 15202 some more thought and if it's the one that speaks to you, flip the 15400 for it and use the extra cash in the watch fund for another watch.
Agreed to this.
__________________
A Lange & Sohne Langematik Perpetual / Audemars Piguet ROO Rubberclad Black dial / Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15300 / Vacheron Constantin Malte Grand Classiq / Rolex Datejust / JLC Reverso Day n Nite
El118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 02:04 PM   #23
wrxsti
"TRF" Member
 
wrxsti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,695
sorry once u go jumbo u never go back
__________________
PP Geneva
wrxsti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 08:28 PM   #24
capote
"TRF" Member
 
capote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Sweden
Watch: 16570
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by benlee View Post
the Jumbo is a more authentic and superior version of the two ROs
The 15202 is the AP to have IMO. Infact, its the only AP I would ever consider.
capote is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 09:44 PM   #25
bric
"TRF" Member
 
bric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Asia Pacific
Watch: AP ROC
Posts: 34
Get a Royal Oak Chrono... Solves your dilemma haha!
bric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 10:03 PM   #26
travisb
"TRF" Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,747
They can.
If only one then it has to be the 15202.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2014, 10:09 PM   #27
Scott in Arizona
"TRF" Member
 
Scott in Arizona's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Well, um....
Watch: Depends on the day
Posts: 149
Personally I need more variety in my collection but I think they would absolutely work together. The 15202 is so thin that I used mine mostly as a piece with dress or long sleeved sport shirts, as it shrunk a bit with short sleeves. The 15400 fixes that issue or at least would for me. Together, if you are content with that look only I think they complement each other well.

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
Scott in Arizona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2014, 01:01 AM   #28
Dcmk
Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 264
I would be satisfied with the 15202 and sell that 15400 to fund another piece like an offshore diver or chrono
Dcmk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 April 2014, 01:02 AM   #29
Vittorio77
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Jakarta - Moscow
Watch: YM, Explo, Pelagos
Posts: 71
I would say yes. Different dial color is enough to justify
Vittorio77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 April 2014, 06:43 PM   #30
masterkiller
"TRF" Member
 
masterkiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sweden
Watch: Rolex, AP & PAM...
Posts: 1,403
One 15300 is the best compromise, a bit chunkier then the jumbo and a bit sleekier then the 15400...
__________________
Rolex - SubC...
AP - Diver...
Panerai - PAM380
Omega - Speedy PRO
masterkiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.