Gold GMT II vs steel 26400...should I ?

[yyzpam]

I had a desire to add a little sparkle to my life and was offered an interesting proposition:

Rolex Gold GMT II 116718 in trade for my steel 44 novelty 26400.

After initially rejecting the offer...I'm having some second thoughts.

I would love to upgrade the steel for the RG 44 Novelty, but its just not in cards, budget wise.

I would still have my AP fix in the form of my FC diver

Thoughts ? Comments ?

[Snow-Dweller]

Go, go. What are you waiting for!

[AK797]

Yes I would do it as you have a Diver and an all gold Rolex is stunning. Then keep saving and flip for the RG 44MM.

[s14roller]

Do it one, do it right, cheaper that way ;)

I was in the same situation...had a 44ss and wanted a 44rg. Also tried on the YG gmt a few times but my wife thought I looked old. Must admit, I didnt love it either.

Ended up selling/saving for a 44rg and couldnt be happier!

[texex91]

Dump Diver and 44mm SS and get RG 44mm--simple.

The RG 44mm AP in my book is numero uno.

Nothing against Gold GMT (love GMT), but AP RG 44mm is on another level...IMHO.

Albeit it's not the gold GMT version, it's the best I can do:

[thomaspp]

I'd do that trade as I think the 718 is one of the best watches out there

[kilyung]

I'd do it or try for the RG 44mm.

[DreambreaX]

do you want to trade gold for steel?

Think again.

I would sell my ap diver fc and get another gold rolexes. regret buying non precious metal ap.

if you want to improve better get the rg novelties. (although for me i would not, i stick to rolexes)

[diver2012]

Originally Posted by DreambreaX

do you want to trade gold for steel?

Sure...why not? It's the better watch.



Seems like a fair trade too.

[HL65]

Originally Posted by DreambreaX

do you want to trade gold for steel?

Think again.

I would sell my ap diver fc and get another gold rolexes. regret buying non precious metal ap.

if you want to improve better get the rg novelties. (although for me i would not, i stick to rolexes)

Another shocker! I am surprised to hear you say you would stick to Rolex--especially gold ones.

[SamGMT]

Yes, I will do it!
However, I will save up for the RG 44mm.

[texex91]

Originally Posted by DreambreaX

do you want to trade gold for steel?

Think again.

I would sell my ap diver fc and get another gold rolexes. regret buying non precious metal ap.

if you want to improve better get the rg novelties. (although for me i would not, i stick to rolexes)

What happened to your Hublot love...

[improviz]

Originally Posted by DreambreaX

do you want to trade gold for steel?

Think again.

I would sell my ap diver fc and get another gold rolexes. regret buying non precious metal ap.

if you want to improve better get the rg novelties. (although for me i would not, i stick to rolexes)

I say pics of your supposed AP FC Diver or it didn't happen. You've claimed to own all sorts of high-dollar watches, never posted a pic of any of them, always posting googled pics from other forums, and trolling this one.

Where are your pics?

[texex91]

Originally Posted by improviz

I say pics of your supposed AP FC Diver or it didn't happen. You've claimed to own all sorts of high-dollar watches, never posted a pic of any of them, always posting googled pics from other forums, and trolling this one.

Where are your pics?

Think there is as good a chance of this happening as spotting a unicorn...

[improviz]

Originally Posted by texex91

Think there is as good a chance of this happening as spotting a unicorn...

I noticed that he was online when I posted it but skedaddled outta here pretty quickly after that, you could almost hear fast footsteps, door slamming, and tires screeching!

[Soly20]

Save up for what you really want, the 44RG. Do not compromise.

[MichaelFlash]

I would do that trade in a heartbeat. I love my 116718. However, I do lust for the 26400. Still, go for the gold.

[MichaelFlash]

Not a fair picture Paul! The gold takes the GMT to a whole different level!

[SamGMT]

Originally Posted by MichaelFlash

Not a fair picture Paul! The gold takes the GMT to a whole different level!

Agreed and the RG 44MM looks like a big bully!

[/QUOTE]

[yjfang]

This is how I would do it. RG AP and Steel Rolex.

AP is a dressy elegant sports watch but more delicate. Rolex is a tool watch made to handle more abuse.

Originally Posted by SamGMT

Agreed and the RG 44MM looks like a big bully!

[/QUOTE]

[DreambreaX]

[diver2012]

Originally Posted by DreambreaX

Great idea...get a gold quartz Tag Heur instead of a SS AP.

[DreambreaX]

Originally Posted by diver2012

Great idea...get a gold quartz Tag Heur instead of a SS AP.

Take a look closer, is that a tag?

[texex91]

Originally Posted by DreambreaX

Take a look closer, is that a tag?

Is there a watch in the picture--that chick is HOT

Wait is it a Hublot !

[diver2012]

Originally Posted by DreambreaX

Take a look closer, is that a tag?

[texex91]

Originally Posted by diver2012

BAM! Quartz city

[psv]

Depends on the age and condition of the 116718 as well. You can find a minty unpolished V-serial or newer for $21-22K, what is your AP worth?

[yjfang]

I personally don't feel that precious metals or stones make one watch better than one that is in steel, per se. I think what makes one watch better (and this is highly subjective) is the design, craftmanship, the level of difficulty in the assembly, features, etc.)

For example, I never understood why one would make a diver in solid gold knowing that at higher pressures, the gold could deform and cause leakage into the case, so why would I want to do pay 2x more for the same Diver watch in steel that would perform better in real life situation?

Another example (and I apologize in advance if I offend someone) is why would one want diamonds studded all over the beautiful AP case known for its awesome brushed finish. I just don't get it.

I have a Steel Novelty myself because that's what I can afford. I would love to have the "ROSE"gold version because it looks absolutely insane with the black dial and white subsdials, and not because it is a precious metal. There are rose gold pieces out there that I don't care for, like the rubber cladded RG ROO - so weird to use such a crappy cheapy material on a gorgeous expensive case.

Conclusion - I would not trade the Steel Novelty for a GOLD Rolex GMT2, because the Novelty is hands down the better watch.

[texex91]

Originally Posted by yjfang

I personally don't feel that precious metals or stones make one watch better than one that is in steel, per se. I think what makes one watch better (and this is highly subjective) is the design, craftmanship, the level of difficulty in the assembly, features, etc.)

Another example (and I apologize in advance if I offend someone) is why would one want diamonds studded all over the beautiful AP case known for its awesome brushed finish. I just don't get it.

I have a Steel Novelty myself because that's what I can afford. I would love to have the "ROSE"gold version because it looks absolutely insane with the black dial and white subsdials, and not because it is a precious metal. There are rose gold pieces out there that I don't care for, like the rubber cladded RG ROO - so weird to use such a crappy cheapy material on a gorgeous expensive case.

Conclusion - I would not trade the Steel Novelty for a GOLD Rolex GMT2, because the Novelty is hands down the better watch.

Little popcorn time...looking forward to replies on this one.

[lipjin]

Originally Posted by improviz

I say pics of your supposed AP FC Diver or it didn't happen. You've claimed to own all sorts of high-dollar watches, never posted a pic of any of them, always posting googled pics from other forums, and trolling this one.



Where are your pics?

Didn't op have pics in another thread
:)? Popcorn time!

Originally Posted by yjfang

I personally don't feel that precious metals or stones make one watch better than one that is in steel, per se. I think what makes one watch better (and this is highly subjective) is the design, craftmanship, the level of difficulty in the assembly, features, etc.)



For example, I never understood why one would make a diver in solid gold knowing that at higher pressures, the gold could deform and cause leakage into the case, so why would I want to do pay 2x more for the same Diver watch in steel that would perform better in real life situation?



Another example (and I apologize in advance if I offend someone) is why would one want diamonds studded all over the beautiful AP case known for its awesome brushed finish. I just don't get it.



I have a Steel Novelty myself because that's what I can afford. I would love to have the "ROSE"gold version because it looks absolutely insane with the black dial and white subsdials, and not because it is a precious metal. There are rose gold pieces out there that I don't care for, like the rubber cladded RG ROO - so weird to use such a crappy cheapy material on a gorgeous expensive case.



Conclusion - I would not trade the Steel Novelty for a GOLD Rolex GMT2, because the Novelty is hands down the better watch.

Hahaha. That's your opinion on the matter: others might disagree:) I'd totally go for the gmt. Hate the entire offshore line - doesn't do it for me. AP is about royal oak and the offshore is like the bastard child of Genta