ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
21 June 2014, 02:17 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: Varies
Posts: 2,055
|
What if 116619LB Blue Submariner came in SS
I am a huge admirer of this reference, but may never get one due to the price of entry. If it could be had in SS for around the price of the LV, I think I would have one. Which makes me wonder how many others feel the same.
So which of the following describes you? A. I have a WG LB and would still have it in WG if it came in SS. B. I have a WG LB but would have it in SS (instead) if it came in SS. C. I have a WG LB and would not have it in either WG or SS if it came in SS. D. I don't have a WG LB but would have one in SS if it came in SS. E. I don't have a WG LB and still would not have one if it came in SS. I am sure I missed some permutations, but those seem like the main ones. BTW, this is purely out of curiosity, as I know that Rolex will never release this watch in SS |
21 June 2014, 02:32 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
If the Blue Submariner came in SS, then nobody would buy the gold version. Rolex is selling exclusivity with the precious metal models. When you take away the visually distinct appearance and exclusivity, you wipe out the demand for the WG.
BTW...I own the WG Sub and would not be interested in a SS version, not only that, but I would be far less interested in owning the WG version if a watch that looked nearly identical could be purchased for 25% of the price.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
21 June 2014, 10:14 AM | #3 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Quote:
Spot on |
|
22 June 2014, 08:20 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: Michiana
Watch: GMT IIc BLNR
Posts: 100
|
I'd want one, of course!
And I think they'd sell both WG and SS of the Blue…they've done that before, haven't they? S. j |
22 June 2014, 05:33 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: European Union
Posts: 583
|
So what you are actually trying to say here is that showing off with your whitegold $$$ Sub-hammer to the pathetic SS scum is pretty important for you??
|
22 June 2014, 08:02 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
Quote:
Haha...I don't discriminate...I have plenty of SS in the collection as well:)
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
|
22 June 2014, 08:12 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: Varies
Posts: 2,055
|
|
22 June 2014, 08:15 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
21 June 2014, 02:36 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,826
|
Interesting thread idea. I don't have the WG and would not be interested in SS either.
|
21 June 2014, 02:40 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
Rolex would never do that and Charles is spot on. I'm happy with the black Subs.
|
21 June 2014, 03:41 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,842
|
Going along with the assumption that the 116619lb came in SS, I'd still go with the hulk. If I want a blue sub, I want a bit of gold to go with it- either TT or YG.
|
21 June 2014, 03:48 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
If, ifs and buts were candy and nuts we would all have a happy Christmas.
|
21 June 2014, 03:51 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
I'd still get it in WG... a good match for my future WG GMT2.
|
21 June 2014, 03:53 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Steve
Location: USA
Watch: A few
Posts: 8,881
|
D. I don't have a WG LB but would have one in SS if it came in SS.
|
21 June 2014, 03:56 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
Black and Green in SS, Blue in WG and Black or Blue in YG all work fine for me. Actually think they have the sub range spot on, my problem is trying to just choose one in SS and one in gold!
|
21 June 2014, 04:32 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Greg
Location: DC area
Watch: SubC
Posts: 103
|
I might be interested if it came in SS. Pretty sure I will never be buying it in WG even though it looks awesome.
|
21 June 2014, 04:34 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
|
21 June 2014, 04:49 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Diego
Watch: Sub-C blue, DSSD
Posts: 2,482
|
|
21 June 2014, 04:47 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Diego
Watch: Sub-C blue, DSSD
Posts: 2,482
|
If Grandma had balls, she would be Grandpa.
|
21 June 2014, 04:48 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: San Diego
Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex
Posts: 4,449
|
I'd buy one if they made it in SS. The WG is way out of my budget, haha.
|
21 June 2014, 04:53 AM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Need pics! Well of the WG option in any case...
|
21 June 2014, 05:14 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
|
Nice one Mike! Are the hands black? Or regular WG as on the SubC in SS? They look dark in your pick
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
21 June 2014, 05:39 AM | #23 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
|
21 June 2014, 05:49 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
|
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
21 June 2014, 05:13 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
|
Where's the option for "you want a WG LB"?
I want the WG sub. My next target. I decided I want the WG Sub and not the WG GMT as I have the 718 and reason for which I picked up the 16710.
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
21 June 2014, 05:24 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Somewhere in PA
Watch: All of them...
Posts: 10,355
|
I love the WG Sub but there are so many watches I want I decided to save a little money. I still wanted the blue dial and bezel so I opted for this model. I do love it. It is heavy and the dial is stunning in different light conditions.
__________________
Patek Philippe Rolex |
21 June 2014, 05:40 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
|
Choice d for me
|
21 June 2014, 05:48 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 350
|
How about this. If they made a blue dial/blue bezel sub in platinum, would you 116619LB owners jump ship?
|
21 June 2014, 06:02 AM | #29 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
|
21 June 2014, 06:10 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
Charles is spot on. I personally would prefer to keep things as is. I own a SS Sub-C, and would love to add a WG Sub-C (the existing model) to my collection one day. Or, better yet, it could be a Pt Sub-C with an ice blue dial and gray bezel. Such a Pt Sub would be a big hit IMHO. I do hope with the slooooow pace of Rolex product portfolio development, in my life that would become a reality...
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.