Biggest gripe about the 16600: Hollow Center Links

[toiletfinder.o]

I just noticed this, although the end links are solid. I would prefer an 100% solid bracelet with the new glidelock clasp. This is the only thing I dislike about this watch.

[tkerrmd]

That's why I prefer the newer model, all the significant upgrades, congrats on your watch

[toiletfinder.o]

Originally Posted by tkerrmd

That's why I prefer the newer model, all the significant upgrades, congrats on your watch

Thanks. I strongly dislike the newer bezel (old one is vastly superior), but aside from that, it is indeed an upgrade all around.

[REFZ]

After owning my first Rolex (114060) for around a year I also bought a 16600.
But with the 16600 I was struggling with the adjustment of the bracelet to get the perfect fit and I didn't like the "loose fit" of the hollow links and the rattling noices so after 4 months I traded my 16600 for a new 116600.

In my case I wouldn't buy any Rolex model with an "old" type bracelet anymore because I think the glidelock clasps is perfect for me.

[toiletfinder.o]

Originally Posted by REFZ

After owning my first Rolex (114060) for around a year I also bought a 16600.
But with the 16600 I was struggling with the adjustment of the bracelet to get the perfect fit and I didn't like the "loose fit" of the hollow links and the rattling noices so after 4 months I traded my 16600 for a new 116600.

In my case I wouldn't buy any Rolex model with an "old" type bracelet anymore because I think the glidelock clasps is perfect for me.

I prefer a heavy, hefty watch, with the old bezel. I think that the old 16600 combined with the new bracelet would be the perfect combination.

[REFZ]

I've see pictures of the 16600 with the 114060 bracelet fitted so it can be done.

[toiletfinder.o]

Originally Posted by REFZ

I've see pictures of the 16600 with the 114060 bracelet fitted so it can be done.

Awesome. Where can I buy the new bracelet?

[Johny]

Originally Posted by toiletfinder.com

Awesome. Where can I buy the new bracelet?

put an ad in the want to buy section.

[padi56]

Originally Posted by toiletfinder.com

I prefer a heavy, hefty watch, with the old bezel. I think that the old 16600 combined with the new bracelet would be the perfect combination.

Being heavier is not always better the SD has been in production since 1972 and myself have never heard of one bracelet failed.Today this Internet term "hollow link" is a complete and utter misnomer all it means in the real world, is simply this. All the links are made from heavy solid gold or solid S.steel tubing and then formed into shape in a press. This leaves a void in the center, just like any other piece of tube,however, the tubes are still made from solid 18Ct gold or solid SS.

While the newer so called solid link bracelet might feel more substantial the newer type or so called solid links are still machined but they are machined with holes drilled right through the metal. So in the real world they are as well technically hollow but not to the same extent as the older type.And in every day wearing would doubt if any real difference in strength or longevity of life as long as you keep them clean.Now thats the simple answer in the life of any Rolex oyster bracelet keep it clean and they will last 20-30 years plus no matter the oyster type bracelet.

Some of my watches were used and abused as proper tool watches for years yet they show no sign of so called stretch or wear yes they are scratched but that's all.Even the older type Oyster bracelets have been stress tested and will take 525 lbs pressure before breaking and that's enough to seriously damage your wrist.

Originally Posted by utc66

I'm sorry to say that after getting poison ivy on my wrist, I seemed to have developed an allergy to the higher nickel content of my SD bracelet, and after a day of wearing it I start getting a rash. When I wear a non-rolex metal bracelet - I dont get a rash.

Now I'm on the search for a seaddweller copy bracelet (Amazon.com?) to see if it's only Rolex bracelet or all of them. I wonder if Submariner bracelets also have the higher nickel content. It sucks, and as a result I'm wearing NATO and leather, but as we all know, the SD is meant to have its bracelet.

All the modern day oyster bracelets will have the same nickel content as its made from 904L SS.But the only difference in nickel is quite a small amount.The main difference between 316L over 904L it has slightly more Molybdenum(Mo)approx 2% more approx 1-2% more Crome(Cr) 1% copper(Cu) and approx 10% more nickel and thats it.Now you could try some clear tape inside bracelet and on case back that might help.

[Clay]

Originally Posted by padi56

Being heavier is not always better the SD has been in production since 1972 and myself have never heard of one bracelet failed.Today this Internet term "hollow link" is a complete and utter misnomer all it means in the real world, is simply this. All the links are made from heavy solid gold or solid S.steel tubing and then formed into shape in a press. This leaves a void in the center, just like any other piece of tube,however, the tubes are still made from solid 18Ct gold or solid SS.

While the newer so called solid link bracelet might feel more substantial the newer type or so called solid links are still machined but they are machined with holes drilled right through the metal. So in the real world they are as well technically hollow but not to the same extent as the older type.And in every day wearing would doubt if any real difference in strength or longevity of life as long as you keep them clean.Now thats the simple answer in the life of any Rolex oyster bracelet keep it clean and they will last 20-30 years plus no matter the oyster type bracelet.

Some of my watches were used and abused as proper tool watches for years yet they show no sign of so called stretch or wear yes they are scratched but that's all.Even the older type Oyster bracelets have been stress tested and will take 525 lbs pressure before breaking and that's enough to seriously damage your wrist.

.

Well said…

[subtona]

The new solid links are nice but there was absolutely nothing wrong with the old one.

Your 16600 is perfect the way it is, save your money (a considerable amount) & enjoy it as it was designed, one day you will understand.

[toiletfinder.o]

Originally Posted by subtona

The new solid links are nice but there was absolutely nothing wrong with the old one.

Your 16600 is perfect the way it is, save your money (a considerable amount) & enjoy it as it was designed, one day you will understand.

Thanks. I agree with this, but I DO like the solid center links! This is my only complaint!

[Clay]

Originally Posted by subtona

The new solid links are nice but there was absolutely nothing wrong with the old one.

Your 16600 is perfect the way it is, save your money (a considerable amount) & enjoy it as it was designed, one day you will understand.

[Scotswierdo]

Originally Posted by subtona

The new solid links are nice but there was absolutely nothing wrong with the old one.

Your 16600 is perfect the way it is, save your money (a considerable amount) & enjoy it as it was designed, one day you will understand.

I agree , its bern around for years , supported Rolex reputation , and I find it if anything a little more comfortable. I have both but honestly the difference is pretty marginal I reckon.

[antbkny]

the hollow center links make it nice and light for all day everyday enjoyment :)

[toiletfinder.o]

Originally Posted by Rolex Dude

the hollow center links make it nice and light for all day everyday enjoyment :)

It also gives it a slight chintsy/flimsy feel.

[antbkny]

Originally Posted by toiletfinder.com

It also gives it a slight chintsy/flimsy feel.

just trying to get you to see the positives. youll always find what youre looking for.

[GradyPhilpott]

Originally Posted by toiletfinder.com

It also gives it a slight chintsy/flimsy feel.

Only in comparison.

The "tin can" clasp and hollow link bracelet have a 60 year history of success.

I'm wearing the new Oyster bracelet with the new clasp, whatever it's called, on my BLNR now and it's very nice, I have to admit, but that fact doesn't detract at all to the old style bracelets and clasps on my 14060M and my 114270.

They work perfectly and will continue to do so for decades, I'm sure.

[Dan Pierce]

You'll come around in due time. Takes some longer than others.
dP

[FTX I]

People have very different opinions on that matter. Guys that can find a perfect fit with the old bracelet simply love it. Sadly I can't adjust the old bracelet so I only have one way. Buying a new bracelet + clasp to go with the 5 digit model is out of question for me because I can't accept paying 2k to mod a watch and solve a problem that belongs to Rolex.

[toiletfinder.o]

Originally Posted by FTX I

People have very different opinions on that matter. Guys that can find a perfect fit with the old bracelet simply love it. Sadly I can't adjust the old bracelet so I only have one way. Buying a new bracelet + clasp to go with the 5 digit model is out of question for me because I can't accept paying 2k to mod a watch and solve a problem that belongs to Rolex.

Great post, thanks.

[FTX I]

Originally Posted by toiletfinder.com

Great post, thanks.

Thank you. This is just my humble opinion.

[ingoodtime]

Originally Posted by FTX I

People have very different opinions on that matter. Guys that can find a perfect fit with the old bracelet simply love it. Sadly I can't adjust the old bracelet so I only have one way. Buying a new bracelet + clasp to go with the 5 digit model is out of question for me because I can't accept paying 2k to mod a watch and solve a problem that belongs to Rolex.

I own both a hollow link and solid, one an F series sub and the other a GMTIIC. I love both and yes, the hollow link does feel lighter and rattles a bit more, tinny feeling clasp. That said, it is comfortable and the bracelet has a proven track record. I would not say this is a problem let alone a problem that belongs to Rolex but it does sound more like your problem. That said, it sounds like you have your solution.

[T01]

The new bracelets are amazing, however, the hollow links are robust and will last with care!

[toiletfinder.o]

Hollow links stink :-(

[Scotswierdo]

Originally Posted by toiletfinder.com

Hollow links stink :-(

[tomchicago]

hollow is more comfortable than the solid but macho types hate on the hollow as it affronts their machismo.

[roklee]

Do all rolex ceramic ss or tt subs have solid links all the way?

[toiletfinder.o]

Originally Posted by roklee

Do all rolex ceramic ss or tt subs have solid links all the way?

Yes, they do. That's one of the major benefits of the new glidelock clasps.

[roklee]

Originally Posted by toiletfinder.com

Yes, they do. That's one of the major benefits of the new glidelock clasps.

Tks!