ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

7S26 · 17 July 2014, 01:20 AM

Hi all. Do you think Rolex will ever change or redesign the fat lugs of the Sub - GMT, to the good looking thinner way it is in the SD 4000?

padi56 · 17 July 2014, 01:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 7S26

Hi all. Do you think Rolex will ever change or redesign the fat lugs of the Sub - GMT, to the good looking thinner way it is in the SD 4000?

Your guess is as good as mine, who knows well only Rolex does, and my afraid my Rolex future crystal ball has a broken flux capacitor .

soho · 17 July 2014, 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by padi56

afraid my Rolex future crystal ball has a broken flux capacitor .

Peter: just give it 1.21 jigawatts of power, and it will be OK.

DCheeta · 17 July 2014, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soho

peter: Just give it 1.21 jigawatts of power, and it will be ok.

1.21 jigawatts!!

mew · 17 July 2014, 03:15 PM

Don't see it happening anytime soon.

Maxi lugs would become a "collectable feature" if Rolex makes the change so soon

sco · 17 July 2014, 01:39 AM

I think the current lugs are good looking, and obviously many others do to! Will they change probably, eventually everything does!

Onikage · 17 July 2014, 03:33 AM

The return to the classic lines seen on the new Sea Dweller is a possible acknowledgement that maybe the thick lugs were too drastic a redesign. I for one still much prefer the older case shape, and the redesign is what has stalled my interest in the Sub and GMT of recent years. The ceramic bezels I can handle being a higher quality material and number grinding gold blasting process plus the machined clasp. With the prices Rolex command for new watches these are understandable upgrades. The changes in proportion just simply will not grow on me. I know I'm in the select finicky few.

The Libertine · 17 July 2014, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onikage

The return to the classic lines seen on the new Sea Dweller is a possible acknowledgement that maybe the thick lugs were too drastic a redesign. I for one still much prefer the older case shape, and the redesign is what has stalled my interest in the Sub and GMT of recent years. The ceramic bezels I can handle being a higher quality material and number grinding gold blasting process plus the machined clasp. With the prices Rolex command for new watches these are understandable upgrades. The changes in proportion just simply will not grow on me. I know I'm in the select finicky few.

Totally agree with you. Well written.

Snow-Dweller · 17 July 2014, 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onikage

The return to the classic lines seen on the new Sea Dweller is a possible acknowledgement that maybe the thick lugs were too drastic a redesign. I for one still much prefer the older case shape, and the redesign is what has stalled my interest in the Sub and GMT of recent years. The ceramic bezels I can handle being a higher quality material and number grinding gold blasting process plus the machined clasp. With the prices Rolex command for new watches these are understandable upgrades. The changes in proportion just simply will not grow on me. I know I'm in the select finicky few.

My reasoning used to be very similar to yours. Then the BLNR started singing its tune. It was a gradual process. Now I have come to love the newer design as much as I still do the older.....and I'm lucky enough to have both.

SeaDweller50 · 17 July 2014, 03:41 AM

Not forgetting the oversized crown guards.

challer · 17 July 2014, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RolexplorerII

Not forgetting the oversized crown guards.

I find the large crown guards very effective.

jamesbondOO7 · 17 July 2014, 03:49 AM

I am staying with 5 digits.

Kyle3130 · 17 July 2014, 04:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7

I am staying with 5 digits.

X2

SWISSAHOLICS · 17 July 2014, 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jamesbondOO7

I am staying with 5 digits.

My words exactly

landroverking · 17 July 2014, 04:11 AM

IMO Rolex screwed up on the maxi case, too square for my tastes.

AK797 · 17 July 2014, 04:26 AM

Only if they increase the size to 42mm.

ExplorerChris · 17 July 2014, 06:02 AM

If we only had a sapphire crystal ball to look into

And · 17 July 2014, 06:50 AM

Although I believe the lugs are a poor design and I believe Rolex know this, hence the SD 4000 design, I don't think we'll see a change. At least not for a long time. The reason is that to do so will devalue the current subs and one thing Rolex does very well is maintain re-sale value of older models. This helps justify new prices and is often used as a justification of cost on this forum. Ultimately maintaining re-sale value helps them sell more watches.

AK797 · 17 July 2014, 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by And

Although I believe the lugs are a poor design and I believe Rolex know this, hence the SD 4000 design, I don't think we'll see a change. At least not for a long time. The reason is that to do so will devalue the current subs and one thing Rolex does very well is maintain re-sale value of older models. This helps justify new prices and is often used as a justification of cost on this forum. Ultimately maintaining re-sale value helps them sell more watches.

They won't change the design simply because the maxi-cased watches are selling very well so the design is not poor but rich and profitable.

REFZ · 17 July 2014, 07:56 AM

I've got the 114060 and the 116600 and I love both watches for their own character.
The 116600 sits a little higher on the wrist but it looks smaller on the wrist than the 114060.

SC11 · 17 July 2014, 06:56 AM

I for one like the maxi case lugs! It gives the watch a bigger look without pushing up the case size, the SDC looks good but wears smaller then my 114060 and I prefer that little bit bigger look.

Each to their own and at least now with the SDC and SubC in Rolex's line up there's a watch for both opinions

jamesbondOO7 · 17 July 2014, 07:16 AM

Well, with that exception:

applebook · 17 July 2014, 09:25 AM

Why would Rolex change a fairly new design that is selling so well?

If you want an older Rolex look, then get an older Rolex. There are millions of them available.

mikebreezy3000 · 17 July 2014, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by applebook

Why would Rolex change a fairly new design that is selling so well?

If you want an older Rolex look, then get an older Rolex. There are millions of them available.

I agree with this statement 100%

LBHQ · 17 July 2014, 01:56 PM

Not to guess what Rolex going to do with the lugs but I prefer them smaller, the size of the crown guards is just right thou.

17 July 2014, 01:20 AM	#1
7S26 Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: North Carolina Watch: Rolex 116200 + SD Posts: 240	Rolex lugs? Hi all. Do you think Rolex will ever change or redesign the fat lugs of the Sub - GMT, to the good looking thinner way it is in the SD 4000?

17 July 2014, 03:33 AM	#7
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	The return to the classic lines seen on the new Sea Dweller is a possible acknowledgement that maybe the thick lugs were too drastic a redesign. I for one still much prefer the older case shape, and the redesign is what has stalled my interest in the Sub and GMT of recent years. The ceramic bezels I can handle being a higher quality material and number grinding gold blasting process plus the machined clasp. With the prices Rolex command for new watches these are understandable upgrades. The changes in proportion just simply will not grow on me. I know I'm in the select finicky few. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

17 July 2014, 03:49 AM	#12
jamesbondOO7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: BondJamesBond Location: The Algarve Watch: Rolex or nothing Posts: 4,077	I am staying with 5 digits. __________________ ♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛

17 July 2014, 06:02 AM	#17
ExplorerChris "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: Chris Location: Ontario, Canada Watch: Explorer II 16550 Posts: 1,401	If we only had a sapphire crystal ball to look into __________________ There's a crown for every achievement A Watch Is Just A Watch A Rolex Is A Timepiece

17 July 2014, 06:50 AM	#18
And "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Andy Location: Beds Watch: Speedmaster Posts: 198	Although I believe the lugs are a poor design and I believe Rolex know this, hence the SD 4000 design, I don't think we'll see a change. At least not for a long time. The reason is that to do so will devalue the current subs and one thing Rolex does very well is maintain re-sale value of older models. This helps justify new prices and is often used as a justification of cost on this forum. Ultimately maintaining re-sale value helps them sell more watches. __________________ Truth is singular. Its "versions" are mistruths. - Sonmi 451

17 July 2014, 03:15 PM	#5
mew "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Singapore Posts: 187	Don't see it happening anytime soon. Maxi lugs would become a "collectable feature" if Rolex makes the change so soon

17 July 2014, 01:39 AM	#6
sco "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Chicago Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO Posts: 3,646	I think the current lugs are good looking, and obviously many others do to! Will they change probably, eventually everything does!

17 July 2014, 03:41 AM	#10
SeaDweller50 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Sandy Location: England. Watch: 14060M 2 liner Posts: 3,204	Not forgetting the oversized crown guards.

17 July 2014, 04:11 AM	#15
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	IMO Rolex screwed up on the maxi case, too square for my tastes.

17 July 2014, 04:26 AM	#16
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,368	Only if they increase the size to 42mm.

17 July 2014, 07:56 AM	#20
REFZ "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Martin Location: Netherlands Watch: The Rolex Way Posts: 1,471	I've got the 114060 and the 116600 and I love both watches for their own character. The 116600 sits a little higher on the wrist but it looks smaller on the wrist than the 114060. __________________ 114060 - 116520 - 126334

17 July 2014, 06:56 AM	#21
SC11 Banned Join Date: Jul 2010 Real Name: Sam Location: UK Watch: AP ☠️ Posts: 6,151	I for one like the maxi case lugs! It gives the watch a bigger look without pushing up the case size, the SDC looks good but wears smaller then my 114060 and I prefer that little bit bigger look. Each to their own and at least now with the SDC and SubC in Rolex's line up there's a watch for both opinions

17 July 2014, 07:16 AM	#22
jamesbondOO7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Real Name: BondJamesBond Location: The Algarve Watch: Rolex or nothing Posts: 4,077	Well, with that exception: __________________ ♛ 5-digit Rolex or nothing ♛

17 July 2014, 09:25 AM	#23
applebook "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: vancouver Posts: 1,918	Why would Rolex change a fairly new design that is selling so well? If you want an older Rolex look, then get an older Rolex. There are millions of them available. __________________

17 July 2014, 01:56 PM	#25
LBHQ Member Join Date: May 2014 Real Name: Ken Location: Home Watch: 116520 Posts: 134	Not to guess what Rolex going to do with the lugs but I prefer them smaller, the size of the crown guards is just right thou.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)