ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Trurolexer · 24 April 2008, 01:00 AM

Hi, yeah which one? Me, I more like the new Sub ND COSC. What your? Please your reply here. Thanks Guys!!!

Best Regards, TR.

Chappy · 24 April 2008, 01:05 AM

it's a great watch either way ... I got the COSC model as it was a gift from my wife , wouldn't have cared either way .... I'm seeing alot of talk about how the COSC version could be in limited numbers IF and a big IF rolex changes to a ceremic bezel and goes maxi dial .... but I just love the look (non cyclops )

thanks for listening
Colin

SPACE-DWELLER · 24 April 2008, 01:10 AM

I would tend to prefer the non COSC version. Imho, the lacking COSC writing makes for a cleaner looking dial. Besides that, the movement is the same in both models.

Trurolexer · 24 April 2008, 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPACE-DWELLER

I would tend to prefer the non COSC version. Imho, the lacking COSC writing makes for a cleaner looking dial. Besides that, the movement is the same in both models.

Yeah, so funny. With the same movement, but one with COSC and the other non COSC.

Turus · 24 April 2008, 01:46 AM

I like the no COSC version much more. It`clean, reduced to the essential, some kind of back to the basics.

Jo

boa2 · 24 April 2008, 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turus

I like the no COSC version much more. It`clean, reduced to the essential, some kind of back to the basics.

Jo

Same here.

mike · 24 April 2008, 02:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trurolexer

Yeah, so funny. With the same movement, but one with COSC and the other non COSC.

Marketing. Still, if changes are made.......

Bobareno · 24 April 2008, 02:05 AM

I vote for the NO COSC.

speicher1 · 24 April 2008, 02:13 AM

Hey question:

If both versions have the identical movement, then is the COSC model theoretically more accurate than the non-COSC?

BTW, I like the non-date sub better. It is definitely an old-school classic.

Trurolexer · 24 April 2008, 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by speicher1

Hey question:

If both versions have the identical movement, then is the COSC model theoretically more accurate than the non-COSC?

BTW, I like the non-date sub better. It is definitely an old-school classic.

I think no. Both is accurate. But one model pay more to get certificate of accurate and the other no.

fear · 24 April 2008, 02:17 AM

Non COSC cleaner, traditional almost like the 5513. Still, the COSC's cool too, but the RRR is kinda distracting .

jmjm · 24 April 2008, 05:29 AM

I vote "Yes"

and "No"

Jason Spring · 24 April 2008, 05:33 AM

For sure, the sub ND Cosc, a beautiful transition model, a next 5512 for me, I wish to find a good sale on this one .

MartinK · 24 April 2008, 06:54 AM

COSC for me, but mainly because I like the look of the RBR... I'm negotiating with my dealer now for a 14060 COSC... pics to be posted soon I hope!!!

Trurolexer · 24 April 2008, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MartinK

COSC for me, but mainly because I like the look of the RBR... I'm negotiating with my dealer now for a 14060 COSC... pics to be posted soon I hope!!!

How much for that BEAUTY?

MartinK · 24 April 2008, 07:08 AM

14060 is ~£2800 here in UK at RRP

wust588 · 24 April 2008, 08:25 AM

Non-COSC for me. I think the COSC writing is a shade pompous and unnecessary to me.
I like mine anyway-it's beautiful !
John.

Lol-x · 24 April 2008, 10:16 AM

COSC is my preference, but I would not say no to either.

vegasvince · 24 April 2008, 10:37 AM

I like the COSC more...and all this talk about the 14060m has made me really want one!

Baptistman · 28 June 2008, 05:13 PM

I have to say, I'm in love with the ND COSC, it looks good and is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo comfortable

Trurolexer · 4 July 2008, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baptistman

I have to say, I'm in love with the ND COSC, it looks good and is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo comfortable

Nice Sub Jon!!! Congrats!!!

14060man · 4 July 2008, 10:16 PM

Does anyone have both the ND Sub and Sub Date? Any opinions on which is more comfortable -- the Non SEL bracelet of the ND Sub or SEL of Sub Date?

What year did Rolex introduce SEL to Sub Date?

JimSnyder · 5 July 2008, 01:14 AM

This was supposed to be a day off work to relax and enjoy the holiday. Now you've gone and got me all worked up over a 14060 Again

watchlady · 24 April 2008, 11:05 AM

I got my Non COSC 14060M in January once I found out they were changing the dial.
I like the clean design without all the text.
From what I have read the recent ND Subs are mechanically the same whether they say COSC or not.

dweller · 24 April 2008, 11:30 AM

pic with my maxi LV with blk insert.

RolexSoFla · 24 April 2008, 12:26 PM

[QUOTE=watchlady;558415]I got my Non COSC 14060M in January once I found out they were changing the dial. I like the clean design without all the text.............[QUOTE]

Me too. Got mine a few months prior. I wanted the earlier classic design while it was still available new.

Orchi · 24 April 2008, 01:18 PM

Err buddy TR...Orchi would concur with the folks here who would prefer simplicity of the 14060 ND Submariner...

Orchi also thinks...sooner or later...if Rolex has not done so by now...they would eventually phased out any of their remaining Non COSC watch models...

That said...Orchi would say that subsequently the Non COSC ND 14060 Submariners(with Tritium Dial) would be more collectible...like its predecessor 5513 Sub.

Good luck buddy...!

Trurolexer · 24 April 2008, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orchi

Err buddy TR...Orchi would concur with the folks here who would prefer simplicity of the 14060 ND Submariner...

Orchi also thinks...sooner or later...if Rolex has not done so by now...they would eventually phased out any of their remaining Non COSC watch models...

That said...Orchi would say that subsequently the Non COSC ND 14060 Submariners(with Tritium Dial) would be more collectible...like its predecessor 5513 Sub.

Good luck buddy...!

Err...Thanks Buddy Orchi!!!

Trurolexer · 24 April 2008, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchlady

WOW!!! Nice shot, Lisa!!!

problmchylde · 24 April 2008, 03:05 PM

I like both.14060 is kinda like the 5513 and the COSC ND 14060M reminds me of the 5512. I said it once....I'll say it again......'' I love non-date subs''

24 April 2008, 01:00 AM	#1
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	Which One More Interesting, Sub ND Non COSC Or Sub ND COSC? Hi, yeah which one? Me, I more like the new Sub ND COSC. What your? Please your reply here. Thanks Guys!!! Best Regards, TR.

24 April 2008, 01:10 AM	#3
SPACE-DWELLER "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Real Name: Bo Location: Denmark Watch: Rolex, of course! Posts: 22,436	I would tend to prefer the non COSC version. Imho, the lacking COSC writing makes for a cleaner looking dial. Besides that, the movement is the same in both models. __________________ With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw...

24 April 2008, 05:33 AM	#13
Jason Spring "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: France Posts: 300	For sure, the sub ND Cosc, a beautiful transition model, a next 5512 for me, I wish to find a good sale on this one . __________________ visit my blog : http://watchparabellum.blogspot.com/ Enjoy your visit !!!!!!! -- WTB:Rolex Submariner ref 5513 --

24 April 2008, 10:16 AM	#18
Lol-x Facilitator Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Steve Location: Omnipresent Posts: 33,698	COSC is my preference, but I would not say no to either. __________________ *Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be.* ~Abraham Lincoln Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim

24 April 2008, 10:37 AM	#19
vegasvince "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: Vincent Location: Vegas, baby! Watch: one from ShopNBC! Posts: 436	I like the COSC more...and all this talk about the 14060m has made me really want one! __________________ SeaDweller "Z" Yachtmaster "Z" Oyster Perpetual "M"

24 April 2008, 01:05 AM	#2
Chappy Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Colin Location: ontario, canada Watch: ND Sub 14060M cosc Posts: 217	it's a great watch either way ... I got the COSC model as it was a gift from my wife , wouldn't have cared either way .... I'm seeing alot of talk about how the COSC version could be in limited numbers IF and a big IF rolex changes to a ceremic bezel and goes maxi dial .... but I just love the look (non cyclops ) thanks for listening Colin

24 April 2008, 01:46 AM	#5
Turus Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Germany / Hamburg Posts: 45	I like the no COSC version much more. It`clean, reduced to the essential, some kind of back to the basics. Jo

24 April 2008, 02:05 AM	#8
Bobareno Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Phoenix Posts: 739	I vote for the NO COSC.

24 April 2008, 02:13 AM	#9
speicher1 Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Steven Location: APO Watch: SS Daytona Posts: 126	Hey question: If both versions have the identical movement, then is the COSC model theoretically more accurate than the non-COSC? BTW, I like the non-date sub better. It is definitely an old-school classic.

24 April 2008, 02:17 AM	#11
fear "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Mililani, Oahu Posts: 1,307	Non COSC cleaner, traditional almost like the 5513. Still, the COSC's cool too, but the RRR is kinda distracting .

24 April 2008, 05:29 AM	#12
jmjm Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: John Kim Location: Cerriros, CA Watch: Blue Submariner TT Posts: 380	I vote "Yes" and "No"

24 April 2008, 06:54 AM	#14
MartinK "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Silverdale Watch: 16233 & 14060M Posts: 44	COSC for me, but mainly because I like the look of the RBR... I'm negotiating with my dealer now for a 14060 COSC... pics to be posted soon I hope!!!

24 April 2008, 07:08 AM	#16
MartinK "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Silverdale Watch: 16233 & 14060M Posts: 44	14060 is ~£2800 here in UK at RRP

24 April 2008, 08:25 AM	#17
wust588 Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Stonnall, Staffs, Posts: 54	Non-COSC for me. I think the COSC writing is a shade pompous and unnecessary to me. I like mine anyway-it's beautiful ! John.

28 June 2008, 05:13 PM	#20
Baptistman "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2005 Real Name: Jon Location: UK Posts: 2,405	I have to say, I'm in love with the ND COSC, it looks good and is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo comfortable Attached Images __________________ Whatever the watch, it's your wrist, it speaks to you, enjoy it

4 July 2008, 10:16 PM	#22
14060man "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: usa Posts: 239	Does anyone have both the ND Sub and Sub Date? Any opinions on which is more comfortable -- the Non SEL bracelet of the ND Sub or SEL of Sub Date? What year did Rolex introduce SEL to Sub Date?

5 July 2008, 01:14 AM	#23
JimSnyder "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Real Name: Jim Snyder Location: Ohio Watch: Ask me later..... Posts: 7,729	Damn!! This was supposed to be a day off work to relax and enjoy the holiday. Now you've gone and got me all worked up over a 14060 Again __________________ "You ain't lived, 'til you've had your tires rotated by a red-headed women."

24 April 2008, 11:05 AM	#24
watchlady "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: the other Lisa Location: Metro New York Watch: SS/RG Datejust Posts: 1,014	I got my Non COSC 14060M in January once I found out they were changing the dial. I like the clean design without all the text. From what I have read the recent ND Subs are mechanically the same whether they say COSC or not. __________________ Oyster Date 15200 : DJ Mid TT RG 178241: DJ SS 116234 Sub ND 14060M : PLATTY YM 16622 : Milgauss 116400 White

24 April 2008, 11:30 AM	#25
dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: usa Posts: 249	Cosc pic with my maxi LV with blk insert. Attached Images

24 April 2008, 12:26 PM	#26
RolexSoFla Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: GMT-5 Watch: SS Daytona, ND Sub Posts: 269	[QUOTE=watchlady;558415]I got my Non COSC 14060M in January once I found out they were changing the dial. I like the clean design without all the text.............[QUOTE] Me too. Got mine a few months prior. I wanted the earlier classic design while it was still available new.

24 April 2008, 01:18 PM	#27
Orchi Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Malaysia Posts: 2,934	Err buddy TR...Orchi would concur with the folks here who would prefer simplicity of the 14060 ND Submariner... Orchi also thinks...sooner or later...if Rolex has not done so by now...they would eventually phased out any of their remaining Non COSC watch models... That said...Orchi would say that subsequently the Non COSC ND 14060 Submariners(with Tritium Dial) would be more collectible...like its predecessor 5513 Sub. Good luck buddy...!

24 April 2008, 03:05 PM	#30
problmchylde "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: PETER Location: Singapore Watch: 1665 SD Posts: 768	I like both.14060 is kinda like the 5513 and the COSC ND 14060M reminds me of the 5512. I said it once....I'll say it again......'' I love non-date subs''

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)