The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 April 2015, 10:11 AM   #1
Shore Guy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 129
904 L Steel Introduction

When did Rolex begin using it and was it introduced at the same time for all SS models? In particular, is my 1986 SS OP made from it?
Shore Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 10:15 AM   #2
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,797
I think it was around 1987 with the Sub 168000. Gradually introduced on new models thereafter. I doubt your OP would have it.
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 10:27 AM   #3
Shore Guy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 129
Thanks for the info.
Shore Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 10:29 AM   #4
powerfunk
"TRF" Member
 
powerfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,799
And also I've conveniently listed the practical advantages of 904L over 316L steel:
powerfunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 12:03 PM   #5
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerfunk View Post
And also I've conveniently listed the practical advantages of 904L over 316L steel:
I see what you did there
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 10:45 AM   #6
powerfunk
"TRF" Member
 
powerfunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Rob
Location: Boston, MA
Watch: 1530
Posts: 3,799
Just saying there is no real-life advantage, just Rolex marketing at its finest imo.
powerfunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 11:39 AM   #7
cedargrove
"TRF" Member
 
cedargrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
Well, 904L does have a Pitting Resistant Equivalent number (PREn) higher than that of sea water, where as 316L does not. Some early Rolex divers had pitting problems where the case back meets the case, thus affecting the seal. As a result Rolex first introduced 904L on the case of the Seadweller in the mid 1980s. It would seem to me that there was a real life advantage to 904L in this situation.
cedargrove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 04:29 PM   #8
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,057
Quote:
Originally Posted by cedargrove View Post
Well, 904L does have a Pitting Resistant Equivalent number (PREn) higher than that of sea water, where as 316L does not. Some early Rolex divers had pitting problems where the case back meets the case, thus affecting the seal. As a result Rolex first introduced 904L on the case of the Seadweller in the mid 1980s. It would seem to me that there was a real life advantage to 904L in this situation.

Further to this.

Some people have significantly more acidic perspiraion than others.
This combined with an emulsion of dirt, dead skin, moisture and elevated temperatures will contribute to higher rates of the intergranular corrosion as noted on the older(316) material of the mid-case backs.
It's virtually a natural pickling paste which works 24/7 on the material.
As the saying goes, "rust never sleeps".

There is an obvious and genuine advantage to utilizing the 904L Stainless Steel, which becomes patently obvious to anybody that's collected enough vintage Rolex watches.
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 11:33 AM   #9
Zaslice
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Chamblee GA
Posts: 227
Might be my perception but the 904 seems to have a nicer luster as opposed to 316.
Zaslice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 12:04 PM   #10
Tseg
"TRF" Member
 
Tseg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: World Traveler
Watch: GMT Master II BLNR
Posts: 1,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaslice View Post
Might be my perception but the 904 seems to have a nicer luster as opposed to 316.
^^^ Versus my other [316] SS watches the Rolex steel seems brighter/whiter to me.
Tseg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 April 2015, 05:56 PM   #11
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shore Guy View Post
When did Rolex begin using it and was it introduced at the same time for all SS models? In particular, is my 1986 SS OP made from it?
Around 1987 but whether 316L or 904L will make little to no difference if 904L was so wonderful dont you think all the major brands would use it.Its more purely marketing and at one time Rolex was the only one that used it, but now that brag has gone as few a few more watch manufactures use it now like Xoskeleton .Sure 904L is a little more corrosion resistant but if you dont have your watch in salt water or acid 24/7 then 904L has little real advantage especially in today mainly pampered watches.So keep them clean this with normal regular service then this corrosion or the so called case pitting in the vintage type watch should not happen.The main and only difference between 316L over 904L it has slightly more Molybdenum(Mo)approx 2% more, approx 1-2% more Crome(Cr) 1% copper(Cu) and approx 10% more nickel and thats it.Its no harder than 316L and if fact 904L will scratch and show scratches more easily than 316L.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2015, 02:06 PM   #12
CoachRolexRyan
"TRF" Member
 
CoachRolexRyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Coach
Location: Boston
Watch: Rolex Deep Sea
Posts: 1,297
901 L Steel Introduction

904L is more exclusive than 316L. It holds its polish better and has a warmer luster and feel. It ages better as well. Others don't use it because its more difficult/expensive to work with. ROLEX actually had to make special tools/machines to be able to upgrade to 904L. Put a ROLEX SS watch and a 316L watch side by side and you'll notice a subtle difference.
__________________
DSSD, PAM 320, PAM 170, BR03-92
CoachRolexRyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2015, 02:26 PM   #13
Mak2013
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Charlotte, NC
Watch: Rolex 14060M
Posts: 681
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachRolexRyan View Post
904L is more exclusive than 316L. It holds its polish better and has a warmer luster and feel. It ages better as well. Others don't use it because its more difficult/expensive to work with. ROLEX actually had to make special tools/machines to be able to upgrade to 904L. Put a ROLEX SS watch and a 316L watch side by side and you'll notice a subtle difference.

An example of succesful Rolex marketing at its finest here.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Mak2013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2015, 02:44 PM   #14
Johnb1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Melb Australia
Posts: 81
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mak2013 View Post
An example of succesful Rolex marketing at its finest here.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not sure if it's marketing or not, but my my Rolexes keeps in great condition and looks like new, comparing to other watches I have.
Johnb1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2015, 11:08 PM   #15
CoachRolexRyan
"TRF" Member
 
CoachRolexRyan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Coach
Location: Boston
Watch: Rolex Deep Sea
Posts: 1,297
904 L Steel Introduction

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mak2013 View Post
An example of succesful Rolex marketing at its finest here.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yup. You got me pegged slick.

How long have you been a member here?
1 day? And you're already an expert on ROLEX marketing??
This is a perfect example of a troll at its finest here...
__________________
DSSD, PAM 320, PAM 170, BR03-92
CoachRolexRyan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2015, 04:52 PM   #16
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,040
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachRolexRyan View Post
904L is more exclusive than 316L. It holds its polish better and has a warmer luster and feel. It ages better as well. Others don't use it because its more difficult/expensive to work with. ROLEX actually had to make special tools/machines to be able to upgrade to 904L. Put a ROLEX SS watch and a 316L watch side by side and you'll notice a subtle difference.
Afraid that's a Internet myth and pure marketing much like it take 12 months to make a Rolex oyster. Today quite a few others in the watch industry use 904L but again more for the brag factor.The 904L steel was developed for use is say large pickling factories and storing acids etc pipes for salt water.Yes 904L steel is more expensive and a little more corrosion resistant. But that's down to demand far more 316L is used over 904L now if it was the other way round then 904L would be cheaper. There is nothing magical with 904L SS and any hardness come form how the metal is tempered so 316L could be harder than 904L SS, and 904L is less scratch resistant over 316L.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder

Last edited by padi56; 3 April 2015 at 10:35 PM..
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2015, 02:34 PM   #17
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
There's an advantage to 316L for people with nickel allergies, who can't wear 904L.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 April 2015, 09:31 PM   #18
VICI
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
Great comments on this thread - learned something new on the 904L
VICI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.