![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brooklyn USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 1,622
|
"Best bang for the buck" $5000
If been shopping around for a Rolex with a $5000 budget, I have considered Submariners with holes solid end links with and without papers ( seen between $4500- $5000, "4 line" Subs no dates 14060M with papers around $5000. I have considered 1990's GMT's and also Sea dwellers usually without papers for around $5000. If the price was right I have considers new style datejusts which I've seen for low $4000's with papers in stainless. So far my number one choice is a Milgauss "M" serial number with card, no box for $4750! It is not the green, it has a black dial and is in great condition. I guess if your going to have a problem, finding the right Rolex is a nice one to have.....any suggestions?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NYC / Milan
Watch: 6263
Posts: 3,938
|
Most will say Sub but I have to say that I like the Milgauss!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: LA / HI
Watch: Rolex / Patek
Posts: 475
|
You shouldn't have any problem finding a great example of a 116610 for around that range.
Some dealers will even sell you the 214270 Explorer 39mm for $5k, bnib. Good luck and congrats!
__________________
Spread Aloha, -MB |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: Tejas
Watch: Invicta
Posts: 1,066
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Angelo
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 42,163
|
For just a few hundred more you can get a BNIB Explorer 39mm 214270 if that particular watch appeals to you.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,146
|
I would save up another $1400 or so and buy a BNIB SubC (No Date) from DavidSW:)
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,721
|
I agree with taking a look at the Explorer I as well as the 14069M Submariner. And yes, you're right... what a great problem to have! Best of luck on the hunt!
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 2 FA ENABLED
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,358
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,358
|
Quote:
ok just wanted to point out, I actually love the 42mm explorer, it is definitely on my list of watches to own one day. but if you were to save the extra money for that watch, I would recommend going for the 116610 SubC instead. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: 116610LV HULK
Posts: 639
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Justin
Location: FL
Watch: PO/EXPL
Posts: 3,371
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: John
Location: California Coast
Watch: GMT, Sub C, Speedy
Posts: 203
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Would go with the newest best condition sub you can find
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Watch: Me now
Posts: 19,412
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: @Home
Posts: 253
|
For $5K, you could get:
GMT 16710/16700/16760/16750 (White Gold) without B&P Sub 16610 w/B&P Sub 16800/0 no B&P I think these will provide you a lot of value. Can't go wrong with any one of these watches as they're great time pieces. It all depends on what you're looking for. Obviously condition plays a big role as to which one will fit your budget, so I'd go for best condition and then make the selection. Keep us posted on what you select. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Bethesda
Watch: Apple TV
Posts: 5,736
|
If you can get a good clean GMT II 16710 for 5k now you should. I think that's a bit low.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 36
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Lance
Location: Nashville, TN
Watch: rolex
Posts: 1,076
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,740
|
No more suggestions.
I'd jump on one of your opptys if they are still around. The Millie is a very different watch but that's a great price. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,229
|
GMT. Or milguass blk.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Rollee
Location: Boston
Watch: it watching me
Posts: 1,945
|
Original Explorer II 16570 is the best $5k you can spend
![]() ![]() Trust me on this one. ![]()
__________________
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 3,745
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: John F
Location: Henderson NV
Watch: Omega Speedmaster
Posts: 133
|
+3. I just listed my 16570 over on omegaforums.net for $4100 (complete with box/papers). I'll list it here as well when I have a few more mins to spare. I bought it from Tony "justrolexes" Geha last year here on TRF. (sorry for the shameless hijack there).
Even if I wasn't selling one, I think the Exp II 16570 represents the best current value with Rolex, very likely to see price appreciation in the coming years. Of course, you have to love how it looks first, no sense buying a watch you don't absolutely LOVE just because you got a good price on it. If you don't love it, you won't end up wearing it, and if you don't wear it, why even own it? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 893
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Location
Watch: 16570
Posts: 56
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,574
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: canada
Watch: rolex explorer ii
Posts: 493
|
Polar
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northwest
Posts: 1,374
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Location: UNITED STATES
Posts: 301
|
14060M two liner
16600 Polar Pelagos Toss a coin, they are all great value for money. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: PacNW
Watch: Enthusiast
Posts: 2,612
|
For me - definitely GMT.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.