ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
29 April 2015, 07:50 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: arizona
Posts: 415
|
smart watches, are they a threat to you?
just curious, I know it seems like talk of apple watch or any smart watches for that matter, seems sacrilegious here on this forum and I am not trying to stir up anything, so if you can, please keep it civil. I too am a watch lover ( all watches, not limited to just mechanical) and I can really appreciate what the new Apple watch can do. I know it's just a computer on my wrist, and it won't last long, can't pass it down to next generation, etc. In fact, that's why I love Apple and any new smart watches coming. It's because they will continuously evolve, making it better and improving our lives, in fact, i would be disappointed if they didn't come up with new models every few years...we already buy watches north of 5 figures, even if Apple has a new model every year at $600-700, i would buy the latest....as oppose to the same mechanical watch i would have for the next 10 years...
so my question is, why do you feel threatened? is it economical? like your watches will lose financial value? or losing certain status by not wearing your rolex? can they co-exist? we already use the latest technology anyway, so why are we so opposed to change?? |
29 April 2015, 07:55 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
I don't find them threatening. On the contrary, I find them interesting and look forward to seeing further developments.
__________________
|
29 April 2015, 07:58 AM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 26
|
I dont want them to become cooler and more mainstream than wearing a mechanical swiss watch. I dont want to be a hipster just because i wear a mechanical rolex. I would never wear a smart watch. Its just cheap electronics which become obsolete in a years time.
|
29 April 2015, 08:03 AM | #4 |
TRF Moderator & 2025 Patron
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: God
Location: Washington, D.C.
Watch: What do you think?
Posts: 38,057
|
I don't see them as a threat to mechanical watches. The pleasure of owning a purely mechanical watch is knowing that someone or some persons actually put together a multitude of small mechanical parts that will continue to work long after it comes time to replace the batteries on those electronic marvels (which themselves will become obsolete very quickly as each new generation surpasses the last one).
__________________
Despite the high cost of living, it's still very popular. Tosser Cabinet Member Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2018 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019 |
29 April 2015, 07:58 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: London
Posts: 1,221
|
I don't fine the apple watch or any other smart watch appealing or interesting so not a threat to me. I did watch the apple watch video and was impressed, but having said that I'll never get one. Nothing will ever replace the feeling a good old fashioned mechanical watch like a rolex gives me.
|
29 April 2015, 08:10 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 216
|
I'm not sure I understand where you are coming from. I don't think anybody here should feel "threatened" by the Apple watch. People here have their own individual reasons for wanting to own and wear a fine, well-made, mechanical watch and I can't think of anything the Apple watch offers to negate any of those reasons.
|
29 April 2015, 08:19 AM | #7 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,608
|
I love Apple products, we have 2 iPhones, 2 iPads, an iPod touch and an iMac. That being said I don't feel threatened at all by the apple watch, I can't see myself ever owning one but "threatened" by it, nope.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
29 April 2015, 08:01 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: UK
Watch: 16610 LV
Posts: 135
|
I like apple (I have an iPad...one of the best things I ever bought) but I have an android phone. I don't see the apple watch as a threat, Rolex as a brand has more heritage and pedigree and stands for different, more long-lasting values I think. In fact in an age where they are starting to have wifi-free zones in cities and when you forget your mobile phone when you go out, and experience this sense of liberation....I think the appeal and value of Rolex is greater than ever.
duncs |
1 May 2015, 12:17 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chopped Liver
Location: S. Wales Valleys
Watch: Mickey Mouse
Posts: 9,926
|
Quote:
__________________
116520 Black, 116610 LVc, 116660 D-Blue, 116610 LNc, 116622 Blue, PAM359, PAM689, PAM737 "Why should you allow an AD to shake you down, just so you can buy a watch" - Grady Philpott Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
|
|
29 April 2015, 08:01 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Sarah
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 92
|
|
29 April 2015, 08:02 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,950
|
Not a threat, my Rolex will be still ticking long after the smart watch is deemed obsolete and replaced by another soon to be deemed obsoleted piece of technology.
__________________
|
29 April 2015, 08:04 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: London
Watch: 124060
Posts: 317
|
No.
|
29 April 2015, 08:04 AM | #13 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: Parrish fl.
Watch: Tt datejust 16233
Posts: 20,952
|
Nope!!!
__________________
Rolex Omega Tag Heuer |
29 April 2015, 08:09 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: philip
Location: missouri
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 1,094
|
No threat to me, but watches like a Sub. with atomic time and solar power would be a threat in my eyes.
So far no one has put that together I don't think |
29 April 2015, 08:26 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: Seattle, WA
Watch: 216570 Polar
Posts: 143
|
Even though I am pretty invested in the Apple product line, I don't see myself getting a smartwatch any time in the foreseeable future.
All of these items have some kind of obsolescence cycle, perhaps longer in the case of a Mac laptop, a couple years in the case of a iPhone - I view a smartwatch as a disposable product which will become obsolete, stop working, or otherwise lose utility over time. My watches, with maintenance, will outlast me. |
29 April 2015, 08:29 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,193
|
iwatch is a threat to all humanity and they must be destroyed. It is a conspiracy to pirate people's attention span, and sap their free will. Stop the robot revolution.
|
29 April 2015, 08:44 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,950
|
Quote:
I know who you are and I know you want to assimilate us!
__________________
|
|
29 April 2015, 08:30 AM | #18 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,475
|
They say that there are no stupid questions, so I always assume that the person asking this question is immature and lacking in social grace.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
29 April 2015, 08:43 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: arizona
Posts: 415
|
rephrase the question
Quote:
perhaps you shouldn't assume things...because I am neither...so much for civility.. |
|
29 April 2015, 08:51 AM | #20 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,475
|
Quote:
The Apple watch is not the first smart watch and so far they have failed to gain traction. Just because this device is made by Apple is no guarantee that it will have any lasting impact on anyone. What is annoying is the assumption that those who have no interest in this device are in some way impaired.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
|
29 April 2015, 08:51 AM | #21 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SRQ
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,140
|
No can't say I am.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
29 April 2015, 08:51 AM | #22 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Watch: Date & No Date
Posts: 10,866
|
I think the Apple Watch's performance pretty much says it all. No.
__________________
"You might as well question why we breathe. If we stop breathing, we'll die. If we stop fighting our enemies, the world will die." Paul Henreid as Victor Laszlo in Casablanca |
29 April 2015, 10:34 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,147
|
Definitely not theatened!
|
29 April 2015, 10:56 PM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Greg
Location: michigan
Watch: Rolex Oyster
Posts: 4,044
|
I really hope the watch community switches over to these new fantastic Iwatches so I can swoop up mechanical watches for a pittance of what they are now, but it's but a dream. If I won the lottery tomorrow, the most basic model of Iwatch wouldn't even impress me, as I no longer have an IPhone, and never plan on going back. nothing beat the 4s in terms of looks and feel, but they were far too fragile. my waterproof Samsung with a damn near indestructible touch screen suits my lifestyle. and even if it were compatible with my phone, it wouldn't be taking up that watch real estate for sure. bad enough I have a cell phone in my pocket. I don't need to be anymore "connected"
|
1 May 2015, 07:42 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,153
|
Don't feel threatened in the least...just don't have much interest in the whole smart watch thing.
Improving our lives? Going to take more than a smart watch to do it for me. Sorry. |
1 May 2015, 07:48 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
Not to me, I'm not planning on having any more children anyway.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
1 May 2015, 11:22 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
I'm pretty secure myself!!
|
1 May 2015, 11:50 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,237
|
I don't even care for a smart phone. So , no, apple watch does not affect me in any way.
|
1 May 2015, 12:00 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,871
|
Never been into gimmicky toys, so Apple (or anyone else) won't sell me one of these either. Got an iPad for Christmas but didn't have a use for it so gave it to my wife.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..." |
1 May 2015, 05:02 PM | #30 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,887
|
As soon as there is a watch that will replace my main phone, has a few days of battery time and a decent user interface I will most likely get it. It would then go on my other wrist. I am not getting a watch that is not also a stand alone phone.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.