Speedmaster > Daytona?

[LAK2881]

Let me begin this by saying I for one believe that Rolex is on a completely different level than Omega. That being said i went to one of my local watch stores yesterday and was blown away by the Speedmaster grey side of the moon. Ceramic case, exhibition back, and 44mm, it is absolutely stunning. I have been in the market for a light faced watch either white or silver for a while now but havent found anything that i love. I like the white face Daytona but everyone has one and i also feel like its a little undersized. Wish they would come out with an updated version already and stop making us all wait. I like the white faced AP dive watch but its a bit too pricey for a dive watch and I also like the cartier calibre. I currently have 2 Breitlings and a BLNR and want something a lighter but not too dressy as i wear casual clothes to work and wear a suit less than 10 times per year.

All this being said i guess my main question is am i crazy for liking this Omega over other comparable watches? And what are your thoughts pros and cons for the comparison of a speedmaster to a daytona.

[tkerrmd]

Well after reading that, not sure how anyone wouldn't tell you to get the Omega?

They are both great watches and I have both, but if could only have one would go with the Daytona, as a personal preference....

[Copasetic]

Originally Posted by tkerrmd

Well after reading that, not sure how anyone wouldn't tell you to get the Omega?

They are both great watches and I have both, but if could only have one would go with the Daytona, as a personal preference....

Dr Tom, you sure post great pictures!

[Fresh_1]

Originally Posted by tkerrmd

Well after reading that, not sure how anyone wouldn't tell you to get the Omega?

They are both great watches and I have both, but if could only have one would go with the Daytona, as a personal preference....

This! Look at the beauty of that watch not to mention its Iconic status. One my favorite photos of the white Daytona, courtesy of Dr. Tom.

[beshannon]

Originally Posted by LAK2881

All this being said i guess my main question is am i crazy for liking this Omega over other comparable watches? And what are your thoughts pros and cons for the comparison of a speedmaster to a daytona.

Get what you like and be happy.

There are no rules.

As far as comparison, I have both and love both.

[HorologyK]

Mmmmmm, Daytona baby, Daytona !!

[roadsterdoc]

Grey Side is gorgeous. Other pros: It is 44.25mm and it has a date function. You won't likely see someone else wearing one the same time as you.
The only con I can think of: Omegas just don't hold their value as well as Rolexes. But you aren't buying the watch as an investment are you? You shouldn't, as there are better places to invest your money. Buy it because you like it, and don't look back.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[mrhy]

I am probably in the minority here.I have owned both ,still have the speedy


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[rolepam312]

Originally Posted by mrhy

I am probably in the minority here.I have owned both ,still have the speedy


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Sold both black and white daytonas ... But I still have my speedy ....

[JRT]

You have told us what your preference is. Good luck to your Chronograph hunting.

[Seaswirl]

The GSOTM is nice, but it seems a bit fad-ish to me. Omega released a slew of new XSOTMs at Basel, and, to me, at least, they're diluting the allure of the ceramic Speedies. Grey market prices are already well well well below the MSRP of $12k. I'd go Daytona. Better size, better water resistance and timeless.

[Mr Daytona]

Originally Posted by Seaswirl

The GSOTM is nice, but it seems a bit fad-ish to me. Omega released a slew of new XSOTMs at Basel, and, to me, at least, they're diluting the allure of the ceramic Speedies. Grey market prices are already well well well below the MSRP of $12k. I'd go Daytona. Better size, better water resistance and timeless.

The Speedy 9300 and the Daytona have the same water resistance. This is not the Speedy of old.

[Seaswirl]

Originally Posted by Mr Daytona

The Speedy 9300 and the Daytona have the same water resistance. This is not the Speedy of old.

Per the manufacturers' websites, the GSOTM has a WR of 167 ft, which is the same as the Speedy Pro. The WR for the Daytona is 330 ft.

[Mr Daytona]

Originally Posted by Seaswirl

Per the manufacturers' websites, the GSOTM has a WR of 167 ft, which is the same as the Speedy Pro. The WR for the Daytona is 330 ft.

You are right, I stand corrected. Weird that the regular Speedmaster with 9300 movement has a 100 meter rating. Not sure why this would have less.

[swils8610]

Originally Posted by Seaswirl

The GSOTM is nice, but it seems a bit fad-ish to me. Omega released a slew of new XSOTMs at Basel, and, to me, at least, they're diluting the allure of the ceramic Speedies. Grey market prices are already well well well below the MSRP of $12k. I'd go Daytona. Better size, better water resistance and timeless.

I agree. Not sure how they will endure the test of time. Speedy Pro has stood the test of time. Resale is also poor. Who knows how the ceramic will hold up over time.

[Roll the Lex]

Originally Posted by LAK2881

All this being said i guess my main question is am i crazy for liking this Omega over other comparable watches? And what are your thoughts pros and cons for the comparison of a speedmaster to a daytona.

Crazy? This whole hobby is nuts!

If you love the Omega, go with the Omega. So what if it isn't a Rolex? There's always next time...

[Chadridv]

Originally Posted by Roll the Lex

Crazy? This whole hobby is nuts!

Haha so true.

I love the omega! I don't see any reason not to go for it. If after 6-12 months it's not still singing to you flip it or sell it.

[watchwatcher]

It's all about finding your passion...and it sounds like you found it.

[waisoserious]

I love the speedmaster. But my favorite SMP is the blue hand broadarrow and thats under 3k. The GSOTM....for 8-9k...I think Id rather get something else.

[Chadridv]

[subtona]

legibility goes to the speedy


water resistance goes to the daytona

[Chadridv]

Originally Posted by subtona

legibility goes to the speedy


water resistance goes to the daytona

Yeah definitely, just based on hand color and case size alone.

[GB-man]

Originally Posted by subtona

legibility goes to the speedy


water resistance goes to the daytona

Good point Gus. I wish the speedy had screw down pushers and swimmable WR. But it's not that sort of piece.

OP: I don't think it's crazy at all. I really like the dark side and grey side. I finally got the chance to try both back to back and the dark side would be the one for me.

[hchj]

I am more accustomed to 40mm watches nowadays, thus no longer feel the daytona is small. Having said that, the gsotm is also a well balanced watch despite its size. Either one is a winner. But i think you gravitate more towards the gsotm.

[crfsocal]

Daytona is the smartest choice imho.

GSOTM/DSOTM for me are oversized and overpriced, having said that if the watch is singing to you... why not. If its a keeper for you so the resale value should not be an issue.

[Bgator]

Not at all. You can't go wrong with either. I would choose the DSOTM over either of those and the Daytona would be my second choice, but if you like the GSOTM best of the two, then I wouldn't hesitate to pull the trigger on that one.

[FTX I]

Not a fan of that Omega but if it was the classic moonwatch 3570.50 it would get my vote.

[Syed117]

You are not crazy at all.

Both grey and dark side are amazing watches. Would choose either in a heartbeat over the current steel Daytona.

Go vintage and it's a lot harder. Older Daytonas were so charming. Great readability. Almost none of that shine. They looked like they were made for maximum usability.

[Heo2]

One went to the moon and the other went to the race track.

[Hairdude1]

I would go Daytona