ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
19 December 2015, 07:06 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Real Name: ken
Location: united kingdom
Watch: 124270
Posts: 806
|
Which submariner!
Hi guys
I have a 14060M submariner But I'm thinking of adding another but with the bigger lugs and newer bracelet. So my question to you guys and girls out there, which would you choose out of these 2? 114060 or 116610LN Many thanks Ken Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
19 December 2015, 07:08 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: 114060
Posts: 425
|
Perhaps one with the date could be nice to go along with your no date.
|
19 December 2015, 07:10 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Don
Location: Canada
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 2,197
|
This x2
__________________
1988 15053 Rolex Date Two Tone (Grad Present) 116710 GMT Master II BLNR Seiko Prospex LX SNR031 Pelagos 42mm Explorer II 226570 |
19 December 2015, 07:33 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 34,995
|
|
19 December 2015, 07:37 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
|
x3
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich |
19 December 2015, 07:51 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Me & Papa
Location: Echo
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 3,428
|
|
19 December 2015, 07:56 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 778
|
|
19 December 2015, 08:05 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,048
|
x6
|
19 December 2015, 05:58 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 609
|
|
19 December 2015, 11:29 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,705
|
|
19 December 2015, 07:16 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
|
I'd go with the LN since you've got the Sub covered!
__________________
Photostream on Instagram brett_in_bahrain |
19 December 2015, 07:17 AM | #12 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,660
|
Having has both a 14060 and 114060 at the same time I'd go for the date; the two were too redundant for me.
|
19 December 2015, 07:52 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 57
|
Have you considered a Sea Dweller in the equation? I have just replaced my 11610 with a 16600 and couldn't be happier! There's obviously the new 116600 if you wanted to buy the new shape (personally prefer the old) but would have the date complication and a few other differences to the sub. Having now worn the sea dweller for a week, I can't see me going back. Worth considering!
Arty |
19 December 2015, 11:56 PM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Quote:
|
|
19 December 2015, 07:55 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: Cincinnati,Ohio
Watch: Rolexssss
Posts: 3,504
|
I'd go with a 16600 SD
|
19 December 2015, 08:07 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 22
|
Watch out, someone is going to say Sea-Dweller 116600 any minute now...
|
19 December 2015, 08:14 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 57
|
|
19 December 2015, 08:09 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
|
I am going with the majority on this one and say 116610 LN.
|
19 December 2015, 08:11 AM | #19 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
I say 116610... wait for it... LV
I know it's not on the list, but I would consider it. You have your black bezel/dial no date covered. Why not add a little color to mix it up? |
19 December 2015, 10:19 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
|
19 December 2015, 05:43 PM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,468
|
THAT is how it should look.
__________________
E |
19 December 2015, 08:11 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,335
|
What about a Hulk? You have the date function the upgrades of the maxi case/glide lock and is completely different in color.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
19 December 2015, 08:12 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
116610LN no doubt.
__________________
|
19 December 2015, 08:20 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Australia
Watch: 116710BLNR 126334
Posts: 432
|
Something with a date or a Hulk would make a great addition
|
19 December 2015, 08:22 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: The Enabler
Location: South Cackalacky
Watch: me crash my bike
Posts: 5,564
|
This says it all!!!
|
19 December 2015, 08:28 AM | #26 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
|
I would suggest that you go with the 114060. I have one and I also have a 14060M, Z series two liner. I love them both. They are two beautiful but very different watches, with totally different personalities...the last of the classic old school subs and the start brave new world.
|
20 December 2015, 01:17 PM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Point Blank, TX
Posts: 2,894
|
Quote:
__________________
I once dated a girl in high school and her dad told me I would never amount to anything. He was right |
|
20 December 2015, 10:04 PM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: Rob
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 577
|
Yes, and it feels bigger and heavier on the wrist but it is in no way uncomfortable. I love my 14060M but also feel that the 114060 is a very valid evolution. I was not crazy about it in pictures, mainly because of the lugs looking overly heavy and awkward. But in person, although lacking the elegance of the 14060M, it works, in a more modern and masculine way.
|
19 December 2015, 08:45 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
116610ln.
|
19 December 2015, 08:48 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
Date.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.