ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
16 January 2016, 02:42 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: London UK
Posts: 96
|
1978 datejust vs 2004 datejust
Ive seen 2 watches, different sellers, both reputable companies:
the 1978 has all papers, 100% original and last 3 rolex services at 3 year intervals, last one was 2015 they want £3,100-00 for it. the other is a 2004, with box and papers but no service history same watch all except this one has a silver tapestry dial £2,600-00 Am i missing something, are the older ones in good order more valuable than the later ones or is it like a vintage car, buy on condition? Help please, I'm close to doing the deal. Thanks, Craig |
16 January 2016, 02:47 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,308
|
$4400 for a 1978 Datejust, complete set, seems rather steep. Photos of the watch and box set would help determine a price.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
16 January 2016, 02:55 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: London UK
Posts: 96
|
so is there a reason what a 78 would be priced more than a 2004?
|
16 January 2016, 09:24 AM | #4 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,494
|
Quote:
the seller is asking a very high premium for "provenance". On a regular DJ it is not likely worth it..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
16 January 2016, 04:44 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
|
He asking too much for the 78
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many |
16 January 2016, 07:48 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Neven
Location: Twin Peaks, WA
Watch: Serpico Y Laino
Posts: 127
|
It's hard to say anything without pics, but from what you've told us, I'd go for 2004. No doubt in my mind. '78 going through so many services might not be such a good thing, they might have butchered the case etc... Like I said, hard to tell without pics.
__________________
The owls are not what they seem. |
17 January 2016, 06:16 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: London UK
Posts: 96
|
|
17 January 2016, 06:48 AM | #8 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,308
|
Quote:
I'd keep looking and pass on this one.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
|
17 January 2016, 07:10 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: London UK
Posts: 96
|
the seller states that it has papers and a rolex warranty until october 2017?
not sure how that can be though. http://www.officialwatches.com/rolex...-16220-ow41394 what about this one, I know it's not a complete set but he said he will do a deal, I was looking at £2,600? Opinions welcomed:) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.