The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 April 2016, 03:27 AM   #1
DRjre086
2024 Pledge Member
 
DRjre086's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 138
Explorer II Polar - 40 or 42mm????

Hi all,

Looking for some feedback as to preference on the 40 or 42 Explorer II. I've heard pros and cons to both, the 42 has the orange hand which is sought after but I have heard the dial is distorted with the larger hands. I think I would prefer the 40 myself, but wish the orange hand was available!

Let me know your thoughts as I am pretty set on this being my next Rolex purchase.
DRjre086 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 03:37 AM   #2
Danny83
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
Danny83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,302
42
Danny83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 03:37 AM   #3
avilhena
"TRF" Member
 
avilhena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,137
For me, the 40mm fits better my wrist!

avilhena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 03:48 AM   #4
uncufunc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: V
Location: blacksburg va
Watch: 126613LB, 1501
Posts: 472
you're going to hear a lot of this, but try both on. If you can't get a 40mm in store, try on a 214270 or 14060. The real difference is not so much the 2mm difference but the lug-to-lug.
uncufunc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 03:51 AM   #5
sickened1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
sickened1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,050
40mm.

sickened1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 03:52 AM   #6
DRjre086
2024 Pledge Member
 
DRjre086's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 138
Quote:
Originally Posted by uncufunc View Post
you're going to hear a lot of this, but try both on. If you can't get a 40mm in store, try on a 214270 or 14060. The real difference is not so much the 2mm difference but the lug-to-lug.
That's what I figured. I wear a 36 DJ 16013 as a daily so my assumption is the 40 is going to fit best but I love the orange hand and newer clasp
DRjre086 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 03:52 AM   #7
mpd2005
"TRF" Member
 
mpd2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Mike
Location: Phoenix AZ
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 32
I prefer the 42, but would echo the poster above about trying both on.

some say the 42 "wears large", but with my small/flat wrist I'd say the opposite; the 42 didn't look any larger on my wrist than a sub or gmt...if anything it laid a little flatter and looked better.
mpd2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 03:54 AM   #8
Token74
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
A friend of mine has the 42 and loves it. He has big wrists though and likes large watches. I'm not such a fan of the 42, and much prefer the 40. But then I have much smaller wrists.

Both are great, the rest is personal preference.
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count.

Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune
Token74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 03:56 AM   #9
reloxt
"TRF" Member
 
reloxt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Ted
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 383
Both great watches. I had the 42 but moved to the 40. More in balance and better fit for me.
reloxt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 05:28 AM   #10
Dittox
"TRF" Member
 
Dittox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Mexico City
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 262
I've owned both and here are my pros and cons:

16570
  • Pros: Better looking dial (in my opinion), more balanced/refined, fits my wrist better, and has a great value.
  • Cons: Has the old Rolex bracelet and clasp.
216570
  • Pros: Very nice and unique movement among the Rolex family, looks "sportier", probably has more presence, has better lume, and has the Easylink extension.
  • Cons: Didn't fit my wrist, the bracelet is too tapered and looks weird (the watch is sporty but the bracelet's tapering seems to be aiming for a dressier looking).

That being said, I sold the 42 and kept the 40.
Dittox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 06:00 AM   #11
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,437
If you're keen on the polar, I'd definitely go with the 40mm 16570....the white wears much larger than the black and it is overwhelming on the 216570 in the 42mm. Those were my main thoughts for choosing against the watch when I was trying them.
sensui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 06:05 AM   #12
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,414
Entirely individual. I like the 42. Case size, maxi hands and markers, orange hand, more solid feel and better clasp. No faulting the 40 though. Just depends on your taste.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 06:04 AM   #13
Daytona88
2024 Pledge Member
 
Daytona88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5712
Posts: 2,614
Yes, you have to try them on. They wear completely differently and one will stand out as much better in your eyes and on your wrist.
Daytona88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 06:04 AM   #14
chloebear
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 2,902
I went 42 because I feel like it's a good modern size and will look better in 10 or 20 years. I absolutely love the orange hand and text. I find the hands to look very nice in person. When you see blown up pictures they look huge, but in person I feel they are very proportionate to the rest of the watch.

My mentor at work has worn a 40mm Explorer 2 (black) for years and it looks amazing on him. Interestingly I think the 40 fits him better - he's a smaller guy. At 6 feet tall and 185 pounds I think the 42 mm version fits me better.
chloebear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 06:06 AM   #15
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,414




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 06:21 AM   #16
chloebear
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 2,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by travisb View Post




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


It's pictures like this that make it very hard to decide between white and black....after you decide between 40 and 42. Amazing picture!
chloebear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 06:12 AM   #17
chloebear
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 2,902
Here's a pic of mine. For me the black 42mm is perfection. Try them all on and you'll know for sure. Good luck!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
chloebear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 06:15 AM   #18
jcbarrientos
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: NYC
Watch: AP,Rolex,UN,Pam
Posts: 595
Icon14

42!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (114.2 KB, 265 views)
jcbarrientos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 06:16 AM   #19
crazycarlitos
"TRF" Member
 
crazycarlitos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,909
For polar dial, I prefer 40mm with red hand.

(Black dial, 42mm with orange hand)
__________________
crazycarlitos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 08:15 AM   #20
floridaBMW
"TRF" Member
 
floridaBMW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Watch: IWC 5454-07
Posts: 225
I regretfully sold a Polar 216570 a year ago. Recently bought a 16570 to "save money" lol, welp it just didn't do it for me. Ended up picking up a Black 42 and am very happy. Now I have to do something with this 40 exp2.









Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
floridaBMW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 09:27 AM   #21
DRjre086
2024 Pledge Member
 
DRjre086's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 138
@floridabmw what DO you want to do with that 40????? ��
DRjre086 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 09:33 AM   #22
liuk3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,354
42mm polar for me!
__________________
"Appreciate your life!"
liuk3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 09:38 AM   #23
floridaBMW
"TRF" Member
 
floridaBMW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Florida
Watch: IWC 5454-07
Posts: 225
Hey, ur welcome to pm me. I wasn't sure tbh. Just to be clear, it was not my intention to fish for a sale inquiry...just sayin.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
floridaBMW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 10:40 AM   #24
sea-dweller
"TRF" Member
 
sea-dweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
I have a small wrist, so a 40 for me.
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)
sea-dweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 11:56 AM   #25
Ru4scuba
"TRF" Member
 
Ru4scuba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Chris
Location: NCR
Watch: Today's watch
Posts: 736
42mm on 6.5" wrist

Your call...

Ru4scuba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 12:02 PM   #26
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
40 is better looking, 42 has a much nicer bracelet.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 12:04 PM   #27
JLM3
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: RI
Watch: blusylvx2blnrsmpbb
Posts: 723
42mm for me
JLM3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 12:10 PM   #28
red1108nyc
2024 Pledge Member
 
red1108nyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Fred
Location: NYC/NJ Metro Area
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 8,511
This one on a 6.5 inch as well~


red1108nyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 12:13 PM   #29
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
The previous one looked fine, but this one looks enormous.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 April 2016, 12:13 PM   #30
joejoe1225
"TRF" Member
 
joejoe1225's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: USA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 1,928
42 mm
__________________
joejoe1225 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.