ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

deltona · 29 July 2008, 05:37 PM

Not sure where this photo comes from but it shows the New Deepsea along side the current Sea Dweller. Apologies if its already been posted.

Whilst I love the watch and have one on order and I am getting nervous as it looks pretty huge on this guys wrist!

Of course, even the Seadweller looks big on his wrists but mine are only 7 inches so i guess it will look huge on me too, time will tell!

Phill (UK) · 29 July 2008, 05:43 PM

I think you forgot something

The photo!

It has been shown before, and that guy has super skinny wrists so take no notice what it looks like on him. I'm sure it will look ok on an average wristed guy

deltona · 29 July 2008, 05:46 PM

Oops!

Brcmpbl · 30 July 2008, 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deltona

Oops!

That is one tiny wrist, the dude needs a cheeseburger, not a DS.

Dubai · 29 July 2008, 07:13 PM

Agree the guy in that photo has skinny wrists, any way the watch is 43mm there are many watches out there with that same size try one of them just to have a clue how it would be , if the size matter !!

topcat30093 · 29 July 2008, 07:21 PM

I think that these photos may already of been posted here.
But still,they are nice to see again.

moby33 · 29 July 2008, 07:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deltona

Whilst I love the watch and have one on order and I am getting nervous as it looks pretty huge on this guys wrist!

No worries...that guy is Mr. Pencil Wrist. Look how the SD case hangs over the edge of his wrist. He's got no business sporting either watch...should probably look into something along the 36-38mm case design. Now, if you too are Mr. Pencil Wrist Jr. & your Sub/SD case hangs over your wrist...well then, I think you might have a problem. Cheers.

SPORTSFAN · 30 July 2008, 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by moby33

No worries...that guy is Mr. Pencil Wrist. Look how the SD case hangs over the edge of his wrist. He's got no business sporting either watch...should probably look into something along the 36-38mm case design. Now, if you too are Mr. Pencil Wrist Jr. & your Sub/SD case hangs over your wrist...well then, I think you might have a problem. Cheers.

X2

Regards Mike.

mickeydainish · 29 July 2008, 08:02 PM

Looks fab.... I do like...... :-)

deltona · 29 July 2008, 08:06 PM

Fortunately i'm not Mr Pencil Wrist, my daytona almost looks small on my wrist by modern standards. I just hope you dont have to be Mr. Pint Glass Wrist to wear a Deepsea!

SeaDweller1220 · 30 July 2008, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by deltona

Fortunately i'm not Mr Pencil Wrist, my daytona almost looks small on my wrist by modern standards. I just hope you dont have to be Mr. Pint Glass Wrist to wear a Deepsea!

I had to order one extra link for my SD and 2 for my Daytona just to get them to fit right around my wrist without cutting off circulation.
I am looking forwards to a larger watch.
I am not Mr. Pint Glass Wrist but I think the SD looks too small on my wrist.
I hope the band is wider to match the face!!!

marshallr47 · 30 July 2008, 03:23 AM

That's a significant difference. 40mm is about all my wrist can handle.

cmcm3 · 29 July 2008, 09:33 PM

Is it bad that I prefer the original?

Tony-GB · 29 July 2008, 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmcm3

Is it bad that I prefer the original?

Alot of people do, especially as the new DSSD has the same size face as the 16600 SD!

Why Rolex?! WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY??????????!!!!!!!!!!!

Portzed · 29 July 2008, 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony-GB

Alot of people do, especially as the new DSSD has the same size face as the 16600 SD!

Why Rolex?! WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY??????????!!!!!!!!!!!

Ditto..why fix it if it's not broke

Brcmpbl · 30 July 2008, 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tony-GB

Alot of people do, especially as the new DSSD has the same size face as the 16600 SD!

Why Rolex?! WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY??????????!!!!!!!!!!!

You know, regarding the dial sizes, I have never noticed that they are the same until you pointed it out. Interesting.

ral · 29 July 2008, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmcm3

Is it bad that I prefer the original?

Yes, I like the original one better too... especially since 40mm with a steel bracelet is as big as I can go...

Was trying a Omega "James Bond" SMP and it was too big for me. The Submariner is as big as I can go, though it is twice the price of the SMP. No hope that I can carry the DEEPSEA. I am sure that there are some people who will like it. Some people need bigger watches than 40mm.

ronintt · 29 July 2008, 11:18 PM

Not taken by the writing at all, why does it need that?
Surely any one who bought it for diving would know what it was capable of, i do like the size though.

wean_sg · 29 July 2008, 11:35 PM

If it's the same movement i.e. the 3135, wouldn't the dials and hands be interchangeable?

Just an interesting thought

mgm · 30 July 2008, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronintt

Not taken by the writing at all, why does it need that?...

The words are self-hyping; seductive in a way but meaningless as to purpose. My eye is taken immediately to the writing rather than to telling time, which is a negative in my book. Could not the same thing be said of the increase in size?

Trurolexer · 30 July 2008, 12:52 AM

WOW!!! So HUGE!!!

I Think I Like It...

pwrslider · 30 July 2008, 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronintt

Not taken by the writing at all, why does it need that?
Surely any one who bought it for diving would know what it was capable of, i do like the size though.

I agree 100%

sea-dweller · 30 July 2008, 01:10 AM

DSSD is a gorgeous watch !

MR op · 30 July 2008, 01:41 AM

the deepsea is amazing

the best rolex so far...can't wait for mine !

the SD will soon sleep in the vault for a loooooong time!

olivier

Z-Sub · 30 July 2008, 02:55 AM

lose that writing in the inner ring and maybe the flat crystal then I'll think about getting one.
Really don't like the extra original gas.......on bezel. too crowded.
it belongs to the case back.

Tony-GB · 30 July 2008, 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MR op

the deepsea is amazing

the best rolex so far...can't wait for mine !

the SD will soon sleep in the vault for a loooooong time!

olivier

What a waste. If I got one, I would wear it for a loooooong time!

GMTJOHNNY · 30 July 2008, 09:37 AM

one word for DSSD - Leviathan...
That wath is just, well, H U G E .

SLS · 30 July 2008, 02:14 AM

Look at the size of those lugs....I am worried that the bracelet is going to look to small! The bracelet on the GMT IIc could have stood to be a bit wider IMO, but I still like it. However, if my memory is correct, that is still a 20mm bracelet on the DS and that is going to look disproportionate.

Again, I will await final judgement until I get the call to come see it.
~Scott

Tools · 30 July 2008, 02:21 AM

I think that they have bumped the bracelet end-link and lug width up to 22mm on the DeepSEa.

But that is one of my problems with the new block case on the GMT and this one..

The block look and the wider individual lugs makes the bracelet look disproportionate..

SPORTSFAN · 30 July 2008, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tools

I think that they have bumped the bracelet end-link and lug width up to 22mm on the DeepSEa.

But that is one of my problems with the new block case on the GMT and this one..

The block look and the wider individual lugs makes the bracelet look disproportionate..

Larry,
I agree that in photographs the bracelet on the GMT IIC looks too narrow,but on my hand now it looks just perfect......

I think if the bracelet was wider it may look a bit like the Oysterquartz....

.

Regards Mike.

29 July 2008, 05:37 PM	#1
deltona "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: London Posts: 10	New Deepsea & Seadweller Photo Side by Side Not sure where this photo comes from but it shows the New Deepsea along side the current Sea Dweller. Apologies if its already been posted. Whilst I love the watch and have one on order and I am getting nervous as it looks pretty huge on this guys wrist! Of course, even the Seadweller looks big on his wrists but mine are only 7 inches so i guess it will look huge on me too, time will tell!

29 July 2008, 05:43 PM	#2
Phill (UK) "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: England Watch: Sea Dweller Posts: 423	I think you forgot something The photo! It has been shown before, and that guy has super skinny wrists so take no notice what it looks like on him. I'm sure it will look ok on an average wristed guy __________________ A man with 1 watch knows what time it is... a man with 2 watches is never quite sure

29 July 2008, 07:21 PM	#6
topcat30093 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Tony Location: England Posts: 5,449	I think that these photos may already of been posted here. But still,they are nice to see again. __________________

30 July 2008, 03:23 AM	#12
marshallr47 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Real Name: Ron Location: Alabama Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT Posts: 4,673	That's a significant difference. 40mm is about all my wrist can handle. __________________ Ron

29 July 2008, 09:33 PM	#13
cmcm3 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Scotland Posts: 1,112	Is it bad that I prefer the original? __________________ Platona with stickers off club.

29 July 2008, 07:13 PM	#5
Dubai "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: UAE Posts: 232	Agree the guy in that photo has skinny wrists, any way the watch is 43mm there are many watches out there with that same size try one of them just to have a clue how it would be , if the size matter !!

29 July 2008, 08:02 PM	#9
mickeydainish Banned Join Date: Mar 2008 Real Name: Michael Location: LaLa Land Watch: Sub Date 16610 Posts: 1,757	Looks fab.... I do like...... :-)

29 July 2008, 08:06 PM	#10
deltona "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: London Posts: 10	Fortunately i'm not Mr Pencil Wrist, my daytona almost looks small on my wrist by modern standards. I just hope you dont have to be Mr. Pint Glass Wrist to wear a Deepsea!

29 July 2008, 11:18 PM	#18
ronintt "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Garden of England Posts: 107	Not taken by the writing at all, why does it need that? Surely any one who bought it for diving would know what it was capable of, i do like the size though. __________________ Rolex Daytona white face 116520 V2 Serial, Rolex GMT II C 116710 LN M serial, IWC Aquatimer Titanium IW353803, Panerai PAM 00090 (far too many straps too list!), Omega Seamaster Professional 2531.80.00, Bvlgari Diagono Aluminium AL44TAVD-SLN

29 July 2008, 11:35 PM	#19
wean_sg "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: South East Asia Posts: 25	If it's the same movement i.e. the 3135, wouldn't the dials and hands be interchangeable? Just an interesting thought

30 July 2008, 12:52 AM	#21
Trurolexer Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: USA Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex Posts: 18,421	WOW!!! So HUGE!!! I Think I Like It...

30 July 2008, 01:10 AM	#23
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	DSSD is a gorgeous watch !

30 July 2008, 01:41 AM	#24
MR op "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: france Posts: 10	the deepsea is amazing the best rolex so far...can't wait for mine ! the SD will soon sleep in the vault for a loooooong time! olivier

30 July 2008, 02:55 AM	#25
Z-Sub 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: So Cal, USA Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man Posts: 7,383	lose that writing in the inner ring and maybe the flat crystal then I'll think about getting one. Really don't like the extra original gas.......on bezel. too crowded. it belongs to the case back. __________________ SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297

30 July 2008, 09:37 AM	#27
GMTJOHNNY "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: John Location: LONG ISLAND, NY Watch: 2007 DAY DATE 18KT Posts: 1,378	one word for DSSD - Leviathan... That wath is just, well, H U G E . __________________ ROLEX DAY DATE 118238 (2007) ROLEX DAY DATE 18238 (1997) ROLEX GMT 16750 PEPSI (1987) ROLEX AIR KING 14000 (1991) ROLEX GMTIIC TT 116713LN (2008)

30 July 2008, 02:14 AM	#28
SLS "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Scott Location: GMT -7 Watch: GMT's & Sub's Posts: 10,401	Look at the size of those lugs....I am worried that the bracelet is going to look to small! The bracelet on the GMT IIc could have stood to be a bit wider IMO, but I still like it. However, if my memory is correct, that is still a 20mm bracelet on the DS and that is going to look disproportionate. Again, I will await final judgement until I get the call to come see it. ~Scott

30 July 2008, 02:21 AM	#29
Tools TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: May 2007 Real Name: Larry Location: Mojave Desert Watch: GMT's Posts: 43,490	I think that they have bumped the bracelet end-link and lug width up to 22mm on the DeepSEa. But that is one of my problems with the new block case on the GMT and this one.. The block look and the wider individual lugs makes the bracelet look disproportionate.. __________________ (Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)