ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Defiancekofb · 3 August 2008, 10:31 AM

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Daytona-SS...6.c0.m14.l1318 How does the D Series have the CRB?

Someone please do the honors and report this travesty.

frostie · 3 August 2008, 10:39 AM

Awfully terrible

Ed Rooney · 3 August 2008, 11:24 AM

Due to the nature of this auction he is not accepting Paypal.

...you mean the nature of the watch being phony?

Terry Newton · 3 August 2008, 12:29 PM

I reported it.

Terry Newton

SUPERDOC · 3 August 2008, 10:08 PM

I don't know the Daytonas that well, what were the tells here?

figbo · 3 August 2008, 10:59 PM

I'm new here,but I have learned that the 9 on the small circle to the left is perfectly aligned with the 9 o'clock on the watch and that's a nono,real ones are not.

kevinm5mcf · 3 August 2008, 11:08 PM

i actually have a yg daytona and i could not tell form that picture can you help expand my knowledge and tell me how you know that this is definetly a fake thank you

Terry Newton · 4 August 2008, 09:01 AM

Look at the sub-dial 9 that is lined up perfectly with the number 9 on the dial. The real watch has the number 9 on the sub-dial slightly elevated above the number 9 on the dial.

Terry Newton

shedlock2000 · 4 August 2008, 09:09 AM

i will probably be way off, but did not the earlier Daytonas, with the zenith movement line up at 9 and 3?

Must say what i know about fake or real rolex's and Daytonas, you could write on a postage stamp with a 2 inch black marker!

Terry Newton · 4 August 2008, 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shedlock2000

i will probably be way off, but did not the earlier Daytonas, with the zenith movement line up at 9 and 3?

Must say what i know about fake or real rolex's and Daytonas, you could write on a postage stamp with a 2 inch black marker!

This is not the case with this watch. It claims to be a D series and is very much a fake:

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Daytona-SS...6.c0.m14.l1318

Terry Newton

tphan · 4 August 2008, 12:40 PM

To me the first picture show thin hands, 2nd and 3rd picture show fat hands. Two different watch entirely.

And ROLEXROLEX engraved inner ring on a D series? nah!

toph · 4 August 2008, 07:48 PM

the first pic is a definite fake- the others are a different watch

3 August 2008, 10:31 AM	#1
Defiancekofb "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: US Posts: 1,999	Terrible Daytona Fake http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Daytona-SS...6.c0.m14.l1318 How does the D Series have the CRB? Someone please do the honors and report this travesty.

3 August 2008, 10:39 AM	#2
frostie 1,000,000th PostMember Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Earth Posts: 14,048	Awfully terrible __________________ GMT - Master II C - 116710 LN

3 August 2008, 12:29 PM	#4
Terry Newton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Terry Newton Location: Michigan Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c Posts: 6,644	I reported it. Terry Newton __________________ Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc

4 August 2008, 09:01 AM	#8
Terry Newton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Terry Newton Location: Michigan Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c Posts: 6,644	Look at the sub-dial 9 that is lined up perfectly with the number 9 on the dial. The real watch has the number 9 on the sub-dial slightly elevated above the number 9 on the dial. Terry Newton __________________ Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc

4 August 2008, 09:09 AM	#9
shedlock2000 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Steve Location: Canada Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia Posts: 1,770	i will probably be way off, but did not the earlier Daytonas, with the zenith movement line up at 9 and 3? Must say what i know about fake or real rolex's and Daytonas, you could write on a postage stamp with a 2 inch black marker! __________________ The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT

3 August 2008, 11:24 AM	#3
Ed Rooney "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Annapolis, MD Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600 Posts: 5,081	Due to the nature of this auction he is not accepting Paypal. ...you mean the nature of the watch being phony?

3 August 2008, 10:08 PM	#5
SUPERDOC "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: R.J. Location: Canada Posts: 1,546	I don't know the Daytonas that well, what were the tells here?

3 August 2008, 10:59 PM	#6
figbo "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: El Raf-O Location: florida Watch: tt GMT2c,Omega Posts: 19,687	I'm new here,but I have learned that the 9 on the small circle to the left is perfectly aligned with the 9 o'clock on the watch and that's a nono,real ones are not.

3 August 2008, 11:08 PM	#7
kevinm5mcf "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: uk Posts: 2	i actually have a yg daytona and i could not tell form that picture can you help expand my knowledge and tell me how you know that this is definetly a fake thank you

4 August 2008, 12:40 PM	#11
tphan "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Dallas, TX Posts: 831	To me the first picture show thin hands, 2nd and 3rd picture show fat hands. Two different watch entirely. And ROLEXROLEX engraved inner ring on a D series? nah!

4 August 2008, 07:48 PM	#12
toph "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: ChrisTOPHer Location: Sydney Watch: Rolex, Brellum, Posts: 12,601	the first pic is a definite fake- the others are a different watch __________________ "Where no counsel is the people fall, but in the multitude of counselors there is safety." Member No.# 11795

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)