5711 as a full-time, all-day, everyday wearer?

[Mikeyman95]

Good day everyone,

I've been struggling lately about a decision between a 5711 and a DD40 YG silver/roman.

Truth is I prefer the 5711 but it's important to me to be able to wear a watch all-day, everyday, all the time. The DD40 is probably more durable etc (although the WR of the 5711 is 120m v. the DD40 is 100m).

I'm a one-watch guy (except I wear a BR 03-92 on strap mostly in the winter).

I wear a TT ceramic sub at the moment (which i'm going to trade). I sleep with it, shower with it, splash around at the beach, take it in the pool, wear it to yoga, etc. I wouldn't obviously re-pave the driveway wearing my sub (or any watch).

What do you all think? Would I be expecting too much from the 5711? Is it too fragile? Am I putting the 5711 in too much danger of needing service (which I understand could take upwards of a year)?

Thanks in advance for sharing your experiences.

Mike

[slashd0t]

A 5711 can easily be a daily wearer. I have a 5712 and it works for everything. The 5711 is such an under the radar versatile watch. Do it!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Mikeyman95]

Originally Posted by slashd0t

A 5711 can easily be a daily wearer. I have a 5712 and it works for everything. The 5711 is such an under the radar versatile watch. Do it!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks! I already feel about this path...

[HorologyK]

What about a 5167 ? Same movement and more comfortable strap.

[Mikeyman95]

Originally Posted by HorologyK

What about a 5167 ? Same movement and more comfortable strap.

Yep, thought about that. I prefer bracelets in general, and I haven't had good luck with rubber in the past.

More importantly though I'm thinking 5711 will be more versatile (i.e., it's going to work better with a suit than 5167).

I forgot to mention, in addition to water activities, i wear my sub to work.

[PJ S]

You might be slightly better off with the 5167 (Aquanaut) given some of the impending usage – then you could swap the bracelet for the rubber strap, and vice versa. This isn’t an option for the 5711, but can be done on the leather strap models, with a RubberB strap.

If you’ve no concern about the polished sections on the 5711 bracelet, then as long as you employ a modicum of common sense and care with an expensive belonging, then you have little to worry about.

Should the ability to swap straps be an important factor, then you might be more inclined to look at the AP Royal Oak 15400, and the forthcoming Vacheron Constantin Overseas, with its quick change strap mechanism.

[Mikeyman95]

Originally Posted by PJ S

You might be slightly better off with the 5167 (Aquanaut) given some of the impending usage – then you could swap the bracelet for the rubber strap, and vice versa. This isn’t an option for the 5711, but can be done on the leather strap models, with a RubberB strap.

If you’ve no concern about the polished sections on the 5711 bracelet, then as long as you employ a modicum of common sense and care with an expensive belonging, then you have little to worry about.

Should the ability to swap straps be an important factor, then you might be more inclined to look at the AP Royal Oak 15400, and the forthcoming Vacheron Constantin Overseas, with its quick change strap mechanism.

Right, well I'm not thrilled about wear on the PCLs of my sub, so that's a consideration. I assume the 5711 PCLs will become pretty dull which I'm not super thrilled about. HOWEVER, the 5711 PCLs are more round (i.e., narrower and not as flat) as the sub PCLs - so, the effect of the PCLs showing wear on the 5711 should be minimal I think, right??

I've seen the 5167 on bracelet a few times. The bracelet seems too narrow, almost slightly feminine, or is that just me?

[theflywrist]

You're absolutely right that the PCLs on the 5711 really don't stand out at all, which makes it a sportier and more under the radar watch IMO.
Rolex models with PCLs, or even an AP bracelet without the PCLs because of the brushed finish stand out much more.

Coming back to your question, I totally think that the 5711 can be a daily wear watch.
I wore mine for about 4 months straight with very very minimal wear to my other watch at the time, Rolex BLNR.
I would not hesitate to have it as a one watch.

Good luck!

[Abdullasaif]

Originally Posted by theflywrist

You're absolutely right that the PCLs on the 5711 really don't stand out at all, which makes it a sportier and more under the radar watch IMO.
Rolex models with PCLs, or even an AP bracelet without the PCLs because of the brushed finish stand out much more.

Coming back to your question, I totally think that the 5711 can be a daily wear watch.
I wore mine for about 4 months straight with very very minimal wear to my other watch at the time, Rolex BLNR.
I would not hesitate to have it as a one watch.

Good luck!

This man knows what he's talking about

[PJ S]

If you think that, then it’s immaterial whether we agree or not – you’re the one that has to wear it and look at it.
Even though I’ve suggested it, I don’t think the bracelet looks Patekish – not when you see what Blancpain has done for their Bathyscaphe and Fifty Fathoms, Glashutte Original for their Sport Evo (discontinued) and Seventies, and Chopard for their LUC Sport, not forgetting VC’s outgoing Overseas (49150/47040), as well.

As for shape of PCLs – also immaterial, they will go matte from scratches against the bedsheets, sand particles, and daily brushes against most surfaces.

If you like your bracelet to look pristine for as long as possible, then maybe it’s the AP RO or VCO that’s the better option – only you will know how much rough and tumble it’ll be subjected to.

[Mikeyman95]

Originally Posted by PJ S

If you think that, then it’s immaterial whether we agree or not – you’re the one that has to wear it and look at it.
Even though I’ve suggested it, I don’t think the bracelet looks Patekish – not when you see what Blancpain has done for their Bathyscaphe and Fifty Fathoms, Glashutte Original for their Sport Evo (discontinued) and Seventies, and Chopard for their LUC Sport, not forgetting VC’s outgoing Overseas (49150/47040), as well.

As for shape of PCLs – also immaterial, they will go matte from scratches against the bedsheets, sand particles, and daily brushes against most surfaces.

If you like your bracelet to look pristine for as long as possible, then maybe it’s the AP RO or VCO that’s the better option – only you will know how much rough and tumble it’ll be subjected to.

Many thanks for the feedback and suggestions. I'll expand the field as you suggested. I do quite like the VCO and Bathyscape as well.

[subtona]

Not a problem. It will of course scratch but that's life.

[Tony64]

I think the 5711 would be an ideal daily wear, all purpose, watch.
Not a "beater" by any means, but nothing in this price range is, or should be.

Personally think this is a more versatile choice than either the aquanaut or the Rolex for both dress and casual.

As you noted, service times for Patek will be considerably longer than with a Rolex so you might want to keep your Sub as a backup.

[andyol1966]

The 5711 will work fine as a daily wearer as far as durability is concerned,,,,however it will of course show scratches on the brushed bezel and PCLs more than the DD40. It depends how OCD you are about these battle scars. Personally I like to keep my watches minty, so I wear my 5711 in rotation with my Seadweller which is much more forgiving for any knocks and I can be more relaxed when wearing it,,,then when I put the 5711 on, it feels more special. Also when service time comes round, I will have a nice watch to wear if service times are on the lengthy side for the Patek. Of course the other bonus with the 5711, is it will hold its value compared with the DD. However, as a one watch, if you are concerned about it showing signs of wear, then the DD might be the better option. The 5711 is gorgeous though, but perhaps you would not enjoy it so much if you were worried too much about marking it. The DD40 is a very good choice as an only watch.

[andyol1966]

Wearing my 5711 today,,,,just as a teaser

[Mikeyman95]

Originally Posted by andyol1966

Wearing my 5711 today,,,,just as a teaser

Thanks, just what I needed

[locutus49]

If possible I would buy the 5711 and keep the sub as back-up. If not possible, then 5711 and BR for back-up.

Note: I do not own a 5711 but it has been on my radar for a while.

[Mikeyman95]

Originally Posted by locutus49

If possible I would buy the 5711 and keep the sub as back-up. If not possible, then 5711 and BR for back-up.

Note: I do not own a 5711 but it has been on my radar for a while.

Thanks. Well I think you might be on to something ol' boy. The BR isn't exactly a beater, but it's also a $2k piece. So it's not rocket science to figure out to wear the 5711 to the office, and dinner, theater, etc - and put on the BR for the rest of it (and who knows maybe wear a G-shock to the beach eh...).

Thanks to you and all of the others for your kind and honest feedback.

[andyol1966]

A closer pic,,,,agree that you would ideally want a back up,,,,keep the sub if you can

[RUK]

I've been wearing my 5711 for 3 months almost every day. Weekends out, house work, work, events. Works great.
How ever there are plenty of times that I swap to the Sub- water, playing with little one, any situation that I might knock it or scratch it.
I would take the 5711 over a DD40 as it is more versatile. I'd keep a 5711 and a sub

[HorologyK]

Let me simplify things for you pilgrim ...

Dis :



Or Dat :

[ap1]

Originally Posted by HorologyK

Let me simplify things for you pilgrim ...

Dis :



Or Dat :

DAT

[dchang81]

only problem with the one watch plan for a PP is waiting months if you send it out for service. so keep a backup during that period. otherwise a great watch to do that.

[YoureTerrific]

It's basically been my daily watch for the past few months. Stylistically, it's just right: sporty and dressy. Moreover, it's damn comfortable.

I still keep a couple weekend beaters handy, though. That helps keep the 5711 sparkly.

And dchang81 is right. This shouldn't be your only watch if for no other reason than you won't have it for months when you send it for servicing.

[AK797]

I wouldn't have either as a one and only to be honest unless you are fine with bezel marks which can really bug me. I'd at least have another SS for more rough and tumble times.

[malarky_hk]

OP given what you said about how and when you'll be wearing the 5711 the finishing on the watch will be looking old and beat up within a month.

IMHO one of the best aspects of the 5711 is the finishing -the brushed and the high polished surfaces and their contrast and interaction with light. If you don't mind marking up the watch then go for it. However keep in mind the watch is a scratch magnet.

[mps354]

I think it would be a great daily watch...both the 5711 and 5167 could be a one each collection

[jon_jon]

IMHO, a SS watch is better as a daily watch than a YG DD40. Both will scratch over time. Of course the DD is going to be heavier on the wrist, but I am sure you will get used to it. The 5711/1A will feel very light on the wrist by comparison.

Between the two, it depends if you want a watch that is under the radar or something that you want others to notice. I think YG definitely has the bling that many Rolex owners go for to show that it is a "gold" watch. There is nothing wrong with that and we respect people's personal preferences here.

I love white metal - whether it is SS, WG or Platinum. So I would recommend the 5711/1A. But it is really a watch that you will be wearing for years and ultimately you have to be happy with the decision you make.

[MrJ320]

I think 5711 can definitely work as a daily wearer imo. Decent WR and SS is as durable as it gets. Not to mention that I find with thinner watches like the 5711 or 15202 they tend to get less banged around.

[lapince]

get the 5711, best choice by super far