ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
29 October 2016, 10:46 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Deep Black
Hey Guys,
I went and spent some time with the Deep Black today. I loved it when it was announced but thought it would be too big for my 6.5" wrist. Surprisingly, it doesn't wear large at all. Well, it wears large, but not monstrously huge like I thought it would. Also threw on the DSOTM to compare. What do you think? Anybody else interested in this piece? I'm seriously thinking about picking one up. |
29 October 2016, 12:19 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 512
|
I'm quite interested in seeing these new pieces in person. Hoping when I get a call in November from my AD that my Moonphase is in, they'll also have these to check out.
I am a little worried that they're too similar in look/feel to the xSOTM watches and thus owning a Pitch Black will make the Deep Black feel a bit redundant. Having tried them both on side by side, what do you think? Could you see yourself owning both and not feeling like they're too much alike? Also, thanks for the pics! |
29 October 2016, 12:29 PM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,437
|
I tried them at a preview event.. I thought like you it fits amazingly well on small wrists like myself (6.6“) but I still think it's way monstrous in thickness. If you can pull off the watch, I'd get it's amazing.
|
29 October 2016, 01:07 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,520
|
Did the normal strap fit? Tightest hole? Comfy on deploying? I like Orange rubberized PO titanium but didn't even bother thinking too large? Should I revisit for my 6.5
|
29 October 2016, 06:57 PM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Quote:
I had the deployant on the tightest hole and it fit perfectly. Felt great on my wrist, and the ceramic is light so it didn't want to flop around or anything. The rubber straps are really supple and comfortable. I would really recommend at least trying it on, you may be surprised like I was. |
|
30 October 2016, 02:05 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 512
|
Thanks for the feedback. I will definitely have to hunt one down to compare side by side.
|
30 October 2016, 01:27 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Bill
Location: Village of EQ
Watch: 122613
Posts: 686
|
Love them alll. Tough choice as to which but go fir it, I'm jealous. I'll meet you at Brookfield place to approve your purchase lol!!!
|
30 October 2016, 08:05 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Haha, right! I live right next to Brookfield Place, but the guy there was a dick to me. I much prefer the 5th Ave boutique, which is where I tried these on.
|
29 October 2016, 01:29 PM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Rommel
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 9,194
|
They certainly grew on me. At first I didn't like them at all but as more pictures came out it blew me away. I'm can't ever see myself getting any ceramic watch but it's clear why some would in this case.
|
30 October 2016, 04:15 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Asad A. Awan
Location: kabul, Afghanista
Watch: Tissot PRX
Posts: 2,698
|
I love the new po gmt ceramics...gorgeous pieces...would have gone for it could I afford one right now..some day :)
Sent from my SM-N920S using Tapatalk |
30 October 2016, 05:19 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Calipornia
Watch: 116610LN & 311.006
Posts: 586
|
all black seamaster looks awesome.
|
1 November 2016, 03:37 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Looks great!
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
1 November 2016, 09:44 AM | #13 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Everywhere
Watch: 116333 slate dial
Posts: 143
|
I thought I would love the DSOTM. I tried on the black black and although stunning felt too light. I also felt the price to be too high for the watch. IMO
|
1 November 2016, 11:39 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
beautiful watches.
|
1 November 2016, 11:15 PM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Max
Location: Toronto
Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo
Posts: 2,469
|
Awesome looking watches. Thanks for the pics.
|
2 November 2016, 12:01 AM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US East Coast
Watch: Dealer
Posts: 15,585
|
Doesn't look too big on your wrist at all.
|
2 November 2016, 08:33 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
What is the black coating made from? How durable?
|
2 November 2016, 12:16 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 512
|
There is no coating at all on these nor the xSOTM watches. The cases are made and carved out of a single solid block of 100% ceramic.
There is a little debate on durability by some whom are worried about its ruggedness. I can say from personal experience owning an xSOTM, that these watches are solidly constructed. I've worn mine regularly for quite a while with absolutely no babying. Banged it many times while out and about living life. The result is not only no cracking/case damage but also not a single scratch anywhere. With certainty, if I had been wearing one of my SS watches, there would be battle scars to show. |
2 November 2016, 08:56 AM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Rommel
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 9,194
|
They're fully ceramic watches so that won't ever come odd, of course. My only fear with a ceramic case is shattering over time. Once insured though it won't matter.
|
2 November 2016, 10:37 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Morten
Location: Denmark
Watch: 16800 Submariner
Posts: 265
|
MUCH too shine all-round. Omegas biggest flaw when it comes to ceramics IMHO
|
10 November 2016, 06:12 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 60
|
You looking at the Blue or the all Black? I have a DSOTM already, but I'm not sure if the Blue is too "Cheap" looking or not.
|
10 November 2016, 07:38 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,960
|
They have 42mm AND 45mm? It looks smaller than the DSOTM
__________________
135 ├┼┼╕ 246 R |
10 November 2016, 12:41 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 512
|
|
13 March 2017, 02:42 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: T
Location: USA
Watch: 116600
Posts: 998
|
Not to resurrect an old thread, but on a whim (and at the salesperson's urging) I tried on the Deep Black over the weekend after ignoring them for a few months. Previously, I'd never tried on a Planet Ocean bigger than 42mm because I thought anything bigger would be too much for my 6.75-7" wrist--especially since I'm not a big guy.
The Deep Black blew me away. I loved it! I wore it for a good 20 minutes while my wife chatted with the salesperson. The Deep Black is very comfortable and wears smaller than the 45.25mm suggests. I love the traditional dive bezel and the GMT integrated into the dial. Is anyone aware of another GMT integrated into a dive watch like that? Curious to know if the OP ended up getting a Deep Black. EDIT: I saw on another threat that as of late February 2017, the OP had not purchased a Deep Black. If Omega reduces the size to 42/41mm, I'll buy one in a heartbeat. Last edited by Duke84; 13 March 2017 at 02:58 PM.. Reason: Saw answer to one of my questions on another thread. |
14 March 2017, 04:32 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Quote:
But I still love the DB. Like you, I like how the GMT function is secondary to the watch's main function as a dive watch. That GMT hand really does not distract at all, but adds great functionality. I see them popping up here in the For Sale section for around $8k...and I must say I am tempted all over again! Keep us posted on whether or not you pick one up! |
|
14 March 2017, 06:46 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: T
Location: USA
Watch: 116600
Posts: 998
|
Dave, I appreciate the response. No plans to get a Deep Black just yet (a SeaDweller and IWC are atop my list for now). Plus, I want to see if Omega reduces the size to something like 42/41mm in the next year or so.
Love the subtle GMT integration. It's so tempting to me because a decent portion of my international trips are dive trips. I can wear a dive watch and also keep track of time at home for work. Plus, the traditional dive bezel is useful to time parking meters, cooking, and so on. Will keep TRF posted if I take the plunge. |
21 March 2017, 09:05 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
How that GMT hand work wo a 24 hour dial?
|
21 March 2017, 10:38 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 9
|
Look closely at the inner ring...24 scale is on the outer edge of the dial...subtle, yet utilitarian (as someone that uses a GMT function daily at work)...beautiful in person, a dream to wear...despite case thickness, incredibly light (however, not in 'cheap-plastic' way at all)...rubber strap contours perfectly around the wrist, with very little movement or rub
|
22 March 2017, 02:42 PM | #29 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,753
|
Very nice and subtle GMT dial. Thanks.
|
22 March 2017, 03:09 PM | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: woods.
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3
|
I do like the dial alot!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.