The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 May 2017, 09:05 PM   #1
Wildy
"TRF" Member
 
Wildy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 500
When your Deepsea starts to look small !

I have developed a love of dive watches. My problem is that after wearing the Panerai or Omega, my Deepsea blue looks midsize on my wrist. Do you think if I buy a submariner the Deepsea will get its wrist presence back.
Wildy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 09:11 PM   #2
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,034
Sorry just cannot understand this big watch latest fad myself have 8 and half inch wrists and Sub and my 16600 are perfect size for me.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 09:13 PM   #3
Tompe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Chester uk
Watch: Submariner 114060
Posts: 40
That submersible looks mint! I like the new blue second hand thinner ones. My wrist can't take a massive think watch it looks a bit lost.
Tompe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 09:16 PM   #4
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,794
[QUOTE=Wildy;7612724]Do you think if I buy a submariner the Deepsea will get its wrist presence back.


That's one way to cure the problem

Seriously, I've never heard of anyone thinking of the DSSD as small
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 10:58 PM   #5
lee fowler
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
lee fowler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 2,559
[QUOTE=brandrea;7612737]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wildy View Post
Do you think if I buy a submariner the Deepsea will get its wrist presence back.


That's one way to cure the problem

Seriously, I've never heard of anyone thinking of the DSSD as small
Indeed not exactly a small watch!
__________________


Instagram: @lee1563
lee fowler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 09:36 PM   #6
Quailhunter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
One of my friends is a big tall guy and has enormous hands and wrists. He's the only person I know that could pull off a watch over 40mm without it looking over the top.
He wears a small, probably 30mm, and it looks weird just like a 43mm watch would look on my 7" wrist.
Quailhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 09:38 PM   #7
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,254
40, 43, 44, 47....it's all good. wear what you love.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2017, 01:12 AM   #8
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Sorry just cannot understand this big watch latest fad myself have 8 and half inch wrists and Sub and my 16600 are perfect size for me.
"Perfect" is in the eye of the beholder. I happen to think 40mm is a sweet spot and therefore also perfect FOR ME.

There was a time when 34mm would be considered huge, later on 39mm "jumbo"! These days 39mm-40mm is considered to be classic. Not sure how the rise of bigger watches could be a "fad".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cru Jones View Post
40, 43, 44, 47....it's all good. wear what you love.
This is the bottom line right here!
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 10:02 PM   #9
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,548
Great shot of the puny DSSD

3 nice watches.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 10:04 PM   #10
zama
"TRF" Member
 
zama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,807
You could just keep re adjusting the brain and strap a sundial on then the PAM will look small as well...... You are right it all about your brains adjusting I have worn a 366mm DD for 12 months and just got a Daytona I think it looks huge but everyone else will say it is small.
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST
Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed.....
Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze
zama is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 10:32 PM   #11
VicLeChic
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Victor
Location: Spain
Watch: YM 116622 - SD43
Posts: 2,598
In the past I used to complain about Rolex "small" 40mm sports watches like the Sub, SD, YM, Daytona etc. I've always preferred larger watches (PO2500 XL, SOH46, Seawolf and several other divers above 44mm).

For the last couple of years though, I've begun to think that these large watches look too big on my smallish wrist (6.9in / 17,5cm). I added a YM to my collection and don't find it small at all. My latest pick is the SD43, it sits very close to my absolute limit and I find it rather big although very wearable (tapered lugs help).

I've thought about flipping all my big divers bar one but haven't been capable because I feel like they're part of me, part of my life. I look at the pictures taken throughout these years and they bring back great memories, best years of my life actually. I still wear them in spite of their sizes and will probably be holding on to them.
VicLeChic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 10:34 PM   #12
DramaTurtle
"TRF" Member
 
DramaTurtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
Buying another Rolex so our other one can get its "wrist presence back".

What have we become?!
__________________
16710 Pepsi | 16570 Polar | 214270 MK2 | PAM00176 | 145.022 Speedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDL View Post
Rolex moved to its furthest point of being a tool watch. The new Sea-Dweller and Meteorite GMT seem best suited for raising PGA trophies, and that might be the closest we get to one anyway.
DramaTurtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2017, 02:23 AM   #13
traf
"TRF" Member
 
traf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: dave
Location: miami
Watch: me ride bikes
Posts: 1,938
Quote:
Originally Posted by DramaTurtle View Post
Buying another Rolex so our other one can get its "wrist presence back".

What have we become?!


Cmon do any of us really need much of an excuse for a new watch?


Sent from my iPhone 7+ using Tapatalk
traf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 10:39 PM   #14
DLRIDES
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,665
I thought the Rapper watch fad would be over by now.

Needs some glued on "ice".
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”.
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 10:53 PM   #15
Wildy
"TRF" Member
 
Wildy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
I thought the Rapper watch fad would be over by now.

Needs some glued on "ice".
No ice for me mate. And certainly no rapper, just a liking for dive watches. I am waiting on a green submariner to come in, as personally I think it's the best looking watch in the range. I am a big guy and can't carry off a watch below 39mm. They look lost on my wrist.
Wildy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 11:20 PM   #16
DLRIDES
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,665
Quote:
Originally Posted by DLRIDES View Post
I thought the Rapper watch fad would be over by now.

Needs some glued on "ice".

My apologies, prolly a bit harsh !

The Pan seems to look exceptionally large.
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”.
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 10:47 PM   #17
Tampashooter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: In the present
Posts: 846
I am 6"3 280. There was a time when I would ONLY wear huge watches. 44+


Then you seem to regulate after some time. Comfort becomes the leading factor.

Though I still have all my enormous heavy watches, Deep Sea, Panerai 352, etc...I'm REALLY happy in my 36-39 Explorer, an Explorer I, DD40 or a standard sub. I find myself less and less wearing the anchors.

Last edited by padi56; 16 May 2017 at 11:19 PM.. Reason: Removed comments about guns as per forum rules which I would advice you to read.
Tampashooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 11:01 PM   #18
Shaky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 1,125
I don't find 40mm watches to small as I don't find 44-45mm watches to large..I have found my sweet spot is 42-43mm tbh.

As I have said before and it's already been mentioned, it's all about the brain re-adjusting to the size you have on at the time.

I have 7.5" wrists and imo think I can carry off any watch at that size. Admittedly some of the guys with much smaller wrists can't and don't want to try and I understand that.

I don't think 42-46mm watches are a fad at all and I wouldn't describe them as "rappers" watches.
Shaky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 11:22 PM   #19
kilyung
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
You should add a Blancpain Fifty Fathoms to that collection
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 11:49 PM   #20
MrLy
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: David
Location: Washington DC
Watch: PAM 360
Posts: 103
I have a 6.5 wrist and wearing exclusively only Panerai :) I'm still trying to get my first Rolex but every time I try one on, it looks so small :) but that being said I am still going to get one :)

I think you should get another Panny :)
MrLy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2017, 01:05 AM   #21
Shaky
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 1,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrLy View Post
I have a 6.5 wrist and wearing exclusively only Panerai :) I'm still trying to get my first Rolex but every time I try one on, it looks so small :) but that being said I am still going to get one :)

I think you should get another Panny :)
Do it, I used to moan about Rolex being to small but I now have a sub along with other stuff. My biggest watch is the 45.5mm PO you mention, and I can take one off and put the other one on and it takes me a few minutes to adjust again.

It really is conditioning your mind to it, that's all. I wasn't a Rolex guy for many years, I actually loved Breitling watches. Since buying two Rolex I can't ever see me buying another Breitling. I flipped one and kept the Navitimer which is the smaller version not the larger sizes they now do. 41mm is it ??

I also have a Bremont 43mm which works great for me, if only Rolex did a 43mm watch
Shaky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2017, 02:35 AM   #22
armen34
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: OC
Posts: 1,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrLy View Post
I have a 6.5 wrist and wearing exclusively only Panerai :) I'm still trying to get my first Rolex but every time I try one on, it looks so small :) but that being said I am still going to get one :)

I think you should get another Panny :)
You should start with the DSSD.
armen34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 May 2017, 11:55 PM   #23
TitanCi
"TRF" Member
 
TitanCi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: California
Posts: 555
DSSD is starting to look small?! Sounds like an excuse to pick up a sub!!!


Is calling these larger divers or watches the "latest fad" even appropriate anymore? I mean Omega launched the planet ocean in what, 2004-5? I don't think 12 years is new and calling larger watches a fad anymore. They're here to stay it seems.

Just buy the sub!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TitanCi is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2017, 12:36 AM   #24
Wildy
"TRF" Member
 
Wildy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 500
The submariner hulk is definitely next.
Here is the Pam. I think the size is spot on for my wrist.
Wildy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 May 2017, 02:08 AM   #25
Psmith
"TRF" Member
 
Psmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
Beautiful trio, and the Panerai Sub looks great on that strap
__________________
Psmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 May 2017, 09:19 PM   #26
MZWATCHES
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Tunisia
Posts: 1
There is a rule of thumb, if the lug to lug lengh of your watch does not surpass the the width of your wrist it is fine.

Now, I its true that some watches got lately too large with no reason at all, like the DD at 40 or Panerai or even IWC Portuguese (and often look disproportianet Hight/diameter).

But I consider that if the watch has a purpose justifying its large size itis ok by me (eg. Pilot watches like Zenith Doublematic, or DSSD ).

I have a 6.25 inch wrist and I wear a 45 mil Zenith doublematic daily (it does not look rediculous due to very short lugs so it is a real 50mm lug to lug) otherwise how would you stick in its dial a big date, a chrono, a worldtimer and an alarm.
I think size must serve a technical purpose and as long as the rule of thumb of lug lenth/Wrist width is valid it is ok for me.
MZWATCHES is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.