Omega vs Rolex

[stillsane]

I am relatively new to high-end watches but have seen and tried on many Rolex watches. Went to an Omega AD yesterday and tried on several nice watches and was a bit disappointed. Any thoughts?

[NoVaSubowner]

What was the let down about Omega?

[AK797]

I suppose their price differentials reflect your thoughts and the general demand for the two brands. I've owned both brands and think many Omegas used to be great value for money, esp the PO line, but not any more, plus they've become overly thick. Subs/GMTs are easier to wear and hold value much better, in fact some are increasing in value here in UK.

[Marcus09]

Originally Posted by AK797

I suppose their price differentials reflect your thoughts and the general demand for the two brands. I've owned both brands and think many Omegas used to be great value for money, esp the PO line, but not any more, plus they've become overly thick. Subs/GMTs are easier to wear and hold value much better, in fact some are increasing in value here in UK.

This. The only model I like in the omega is the Speedmaster pro (moonwatch); it almost never changed since its introduction 50 years ago. Even though, I still prefer a Rolex knowing that i own a moonwatch and not having any wrist time since many months now.
Cheers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[locutus49]

They are different brands with different strategic plans. Rolex is positioning itself as a luxury brand. Both are good, just depends on your finances and personal preference.

[stillsane]

I did not care for the thickness at all plus I thought rolex had a bit more refined look.

[zaydans]

They both are welll known brands with a long history. Many have both in their collection. One thing I know from owning both is the Rolex sports models hold their value better. Not saying they increase but they don't depreciate as much. Don't think you can say the same for Omega.

[Marcus09]

Originally Posted by zaydans

They both are welll known brands with a long history. Many have both in their collection. One thing I know from owning both is the Rolex sports models hold their value better. Not saying they increase but they don't depreciate as much. Don't think you can say the same for Omega.

Totally agree! I have a limited model omega that I'm trying to sell with no success even though I was told that I can actually gain from this particular model.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[hoppes-no9]

Originally Posted by Marcus09

Totally agree! I have a limited model omega that I'm trying to sell with no success even though I was told that I can actually gain from this particular model.

Whoever told you that was an idiot.

[Marcus09]

Originally Posted by hoppes-no9

Whoever told you that was an idiot.

Seemingly


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[LJG]

I prefer my 2500 aesthetic to the thicker 8500 and proportions of say the DSSD but I've found nice, complementary offerings in both brands

[Swearengen]

Originally Posted by hoppes-no9

Whoever told you that was an idiot.

Was probably the vendor

[WJGESQ]

Originally Posted by zaydans

They both are welll known brands with a long history. Many have both in their collection. One thing I know from owning both is the Rolex sports models hold their value better. Not saying they increase but they don't depreciate as much. Don't think you can say the same for Omega.

Omega arguably has a far more impressive history in many respects.

[Jsanders1985]

I've never liked the looks of Omega watches...not my taste


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Cdaddylutz]

No waiting list for omega

[drm20]

I've had both and to me, nothing is like a Rolex. Most Omega's are a little too thick for my taste.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Alex_TA]

Originally Posted by stillsane

I am relatively new to high-end watches but have seen and tried on many Rolex watches. Went to an Omega AD yesterday and tried on several nice watches and was a bit disappointed. Any thoughts?

Thoughts... yes, I have one.

[One Ping Only]

I like Omega, some models more than others. Th thickness of some of th divers is a turnoff, but I would not hesitate to pick up a Speedy Pro or even the right AT if a deal presented itself.

[Any4xx]

For me the experience was quite different. I've longed for a Submariner mostly because of it's iconic status. I finally started shopping for my first high-end watch a few months ago. There was no doubt in my mind that I would buy a Sub. But I saw a Seamaster and was slowly drawn to it. I finally had a chance to fondle both side by side and ended up really liking the Omega more than the Rolex. So that's what I bought. I will still end up buying a Rolex in the near future, but I absolutely love my blue Seamaster.

[Stevec14]

In many cases they are not the same price range anyway. But in general I prefer the aesthetics of Rolex over omega. My exceptions being the speedy pro which I love and the ck2998.

Quality wise I think the omegas are pretty good though. As with all things, buy them right and you should be ok. There is certainly place in a collection for both.

[DCheeta]

At this point I don't think there can be a debate over the quality of one versus the other. They're both highly-engineered timepieces, and both companies have a long, storied history and have become iconic in their own rights.

What it comes down to is just mostly aesthetics and personal taste. I think we've seen that reflected here in this thread, too (i.e. most here citing thickness or design as the reasons for their preference).

Personally, I love both and have both in my collection in equal measures.

[sensui]

Originally Posted by locutus49

They are different brands with different strategic plans. Rolex is positioning itself as a luxury brand. Both are good, just depends on your finances and personal preference.

Originally Posted by DCheeta

At this point I don't think there can be a debate over the quality of one versus the other. They're both highly-engineered timepieces, and both companies have a long, storied history and have become iconic in their own rights.

What it comes down to is just mostly aesthetics and personal taste. I think we've seen that reflected here in this thread, too (i.e. most here citing thickness or design as the reasons for their preference).

Personally, I love both and have both in my collection in equal measures.

[Mr. Vegas]

I used to think the same as I come from mainly rolexes in my collection. Then I read more about the speedmaster moon watch, and after trying one on I was hooked. Look into its history, and know it hasn't been changed much since its intro. Plus, something about a manual wind vs. my automatic wind pieces gives it a more tool watch feel. I now wear my speedy more often than my subs or gmts.

[s.al-anizi]

I used to like Omega more,

However as of late (past 5 years) Omega has been taking a downward turn with regards to brand value, issuing limited editions with thousands and thousands of pieces, then issuing other "limited" editions that differ not one iota than the previous one, also with thousands of pieces. Models with more than 10 sub-models to them, exhausting the "Bond Watch" image till it makes people sick.

Even though their movements are second to none, and quality is there on par with Rolex no doubt, the brand value IMO is going down the drain towards the likes of TAG Heuer.

Also, Omega sport models in SS bracelets are too heavy for me, try wearing a PO in 45mm and you will get the picture. Even in 42mm it is too heavy and unbalanced on the wrist. Would only consider buying titanium models.

Cheers!

[Marcus09]

Originally Posted by s.al-anizi

I used to like Omega more,

However as of late (past 5 years) Omega has been taking a downward turn with regards to brand value, issuing limited editions with thousands and thousands of pieces, then issuing other "limited" editions that differ not one iota than the previous one, also with thousands of pieces. Models with more than 10 sub-models to them, exhausting the "Bond Watch" image till it makes people sick.

Even though their movements are second to none, and quality is there on par with Rolex no doubt, the brand value IMO is going down the drain towards the likes of TAG Heuer.

Also, Omega sport models in SS bracelets are too heavy for me, try wearing a PO in 45mm and you will get the picture. Even in 42mm it is too heavy and unbalanced on the wrist. Would only consider buying titanium models.

Cheers!

THIS!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[colpol]

I own both - down to personal preference

Forget price/ resale/ brand etc. Buy what you like

[tfjordan]

I have three Omega models I've been very pleased with the overall quality. Only one of which is contemporary (I consider contemporary anything still in production). They are (in reverse order of vintage):
1. Seamaster 300 Coaxial.
2. Bond Chronometer.
3. Speedmaster MK II racing dial.

A note on each:
The SM 300 Coaxial is the most accurate watch I own at +.6 (total) over 7 days. Not bad!

The Bond is perfect at 41mm, has the most comfortable bracelet around, and last but not least, is a Chronometer.

The Speedy MK II racing dial with caliber 861 is wonderful to wind and was made only 1969-1972. It also has over 50 hr power reserve. Again, not bad for Lemania-based movement over 46 years old.

Great, high quality pieces. Equal to my Rolexes? Eeeh, maybe not. But fine timepieces nonetheless.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[NoVaSubowner]

i think they make some of the best values for the money out there. Some like the Speedy are certified classics.

[Andad]

Originally Posted by tfjordan

I have three Omega models I've been very pleased with the overall quality. Only one of which is contemporary (I consider contemporary anything still in production). They are (in reverse order of vintage):
1. Seamaster 300 Coaxial.
2. Bond Chronometer.
3. Speedmaster MK II racing dial.

A note on each:
The SM 300 Coaxial is the most accurate watch I own at +.6 (total) over 7 days. Not bad!

The Bond is perfect at 41mm, has the most comfortable bracelet around, and last but not least, is a Chronometer.

The Speedy MK II racing dial with caliber 861 is wonderful to wind and was made only 1969-1972. It also has over 50 hr power reserve. Again, not bad for Lemania-based movement over 46 years old.

Great, high quality pieces. Equal to my Rolexes? Eeeh, maybe not. But fine timepieces nonetheless.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think the Seamaster 300 Coaxial also has chronometer printed on the dial?

[collarcity]

I had an SMPc and the heavy use of rhodium on the applied logo and hands means the watch looks either spectacular or completely flat depending on the lighting. I appreciate printed dials now.

Here's an example of when rhodium doesn't work: