ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
19 June 2017, 03:13 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Batman
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 1,184
|
Ceramic bezels - perfection?
Dear TRF, while reading one of the threads, I couldn't help but notice that one of the TRF members had a BLRO and sold it because the bezel changed its red and blue colors and was leaning into pink and purple. Would any of you had the same experience with the ceramic bezels like the hulk, BLNR, BLRO, Yacht Master II...
maybe even black ceramics. please share your thoughts. Cheers. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
|
19 June 2017, 03:16 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
|
Highly practical but far too glossy to the point of being blingy.
If they were toned down a tad, they would be perfect. In the meantime, I will continue with my aluminium inserts. Mick |
19 June 2017, 03:29 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
In before the ceramic haters.
|
19 June 2017, 03:32 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Batman
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 1,184
|
I happen to have a GMT LN C and I'm concerned since rolex stated that its ceramics will never fade out. Cheers Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
|
19 June 2017, 04:09 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
19 June 2017, 03:31 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Rob
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 126660,126600
Posts: 1,324
|
Ceramic is the way to go.cant stand the aluminum inserts myself.Ceramic adds a nice bit of flash to the brushed stee watches.Never seen them dad or change color.
|
19 June 2017, 03:40 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
|
Quote:
|
|
19 June 2017, 03:43 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Batman
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 1,184
|
Quote:
Here it is: GMT BLRO vs AP RO 15202 https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink?sha...0&share_type=t Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
|
|
19 June 2017, 03:47 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Larry
Location: Maryland
Watch: Saxonia Moonphase
Posts: 3,428
|
Ceramic bezel looks sharp and doesn't scratch, I would be surprised if it fades
|
19 June 2017, 03:46 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
I think you misunderstood his post. He just became more aware that the ceramic insert colors weren't like the vibrant aluminum colors but rather more like the muted 6542 bakelite colors.
|
19 June 2017, 04:15 AM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
|
19 June 2017, 03:47 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: Pepsi GMT
Posts: 2,926
|
I'm confused by the OP. Was the BLRO that faded an aluminum or ceramic insert? The aluminum BLROs are known to fade over time, and those naturally faded inserts are actually highly sought after. I've never heard of a ceramic BLRO insert fading.
|
19 June 2017, 03:51 AM | #13 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Rolex and Patek
Posts: 11,372
|
Do not fade
Quote:
|
|
19 June 2017, 03:54 AM | #14 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Batman
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 1,184
|
Quote:
Note taken. Thank you for the clarification Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
|
|
19 June 2017, 03:58 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: BoraBora
Posts: 230
|
Ceramic bezels - perfection?
The BLRO has 2 versions of the ceramic insert. Some are a little more pink on the bezel vs red. I've compared side bye side. My BLRO is the more red version and looks great
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
19 June 2017, 04:08 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Batman
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 1,184
|
Quote:
Maybe depending on the cook. It seems yours was a master chef Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
|
|
19 June 2017, 05:57 AM | #17 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Portland, OR
Watch: 116610LN, 116500LN
Posts: 1,385
|
First I've heard of this. Interesting. You don't happen to have a pic when you had them side by side?
|
19 June 2017, 06:18 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
If they were matte grey they would be perfect. Pair that with a matte dial and I would not have sold my sub. It was just to shiny for my taste.
__________________
My grails: |
19 June 2017, 07:57 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: BoraBora
Posts: 230
|
Quote:
I have also noticed the variation in bezel colors at an AD in Las Vegas. I put both brand new side by side and the sales rep couldn't believe I was right. One is a more salmon/pink and purplish/blue color. The other one is more of a red/blue color. And no this wasn't from variation of light! |
|
19 June 2017, 04:21 AM | #20 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Watch: AP, Rolex, Omega
Posts: 1,365
|
Ceramic will not fade. I'd only ever buy a Rolex model equipped with a ceramic bezel, nothing else. The rich deep colour, shine and fact they are so difficult to scratch are major plus points.
|
19 June 2017, 04:23 AM | #21 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
I thought Rado debunked the whole ceramic thing back in the eighties. Will take aluminum any day. Achilles heel ceramics are.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk |
19 June 2017, 04:41 AM | #22 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tampa, Florida
Watch: Pepsi GMT
Posts: 2,926
|
|
19 June 2017, 04:43 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
|
|
19 June 2017, 06:19 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wild Blue Yonder
Watch: 116710 LN
Posts: 1,613
|
|
19 June 2017, 07:18 AM | #25 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Rob
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 126660,126600
Posts: 1,324
|
|
19 June 2017, 04:56 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Sandy
Location: England.
Watch: 14060M 2 liner
Posts: 3,204
|
Prefer Aluminium personally.
|
19 June 2017, 07:15 AM | #27 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi,
Posts: 2,084
|
They're all good for different reasons!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
19 June 2017, 07:58 AM | #28 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: United States
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 179
|
I have owned both and love the ceramic. Especially because the numerals are etched in and have a more technical appearance. Also the high gloss finish.
|
19 June 2017, 08:07 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: New York
Watch: 16570, 14060M
Posts: 379
|
Had a ceramic Omega. Glad to have owned it so I could tick the ceramic box, but I grew tired of the shine. Aluminum for me.
|
19 June 2017, 08:42 AM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 63
|
I'm used to the look of ceramic. I think the alu ones look thin & cheap (I know they're not).
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.