ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
30 August 2017, 03:49 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
|
BIG Tudor Black Bay Bronze problem
I hope you don't mind I just post a link this time
Most of you know that site too :-) http://www.watchprosite.com/rolex/so...936.8966566/0/
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches |
30 August 2017, 03:52 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
No issues with mine
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
30 August 2017, 04:09 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
|
Dare to put it in seawater or salt water ? Let's say 2 hrs in the water, then a few hours out of the water ... and repeat it a couple of times These watches claim to be made to be used as a diver watch
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches |
30 August 2017, 04:33 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Quote:
Then again I did not buy it as a divers watch. And for the record this seems to be the only person having an issue, at least that I have seen posted.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
|
30 August 2017, 04:55 AM | #5 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
|
Quote:
I made the post Are you on Instagram? Than you might also know MrTudor... contact him Believe me, I'm not the only one
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches |
|
30 August 2017, 04:32 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: BMF
Location: Tennessee USA
Watch: FPJ UTC
Posts: 2,263
|
Well mine has seen plenty of saltwater with no issues. That case looks like it's been subjected to more than saltwater.
One pic with a minor bezel flaw does not equal a problem, let alone a big one... |
30 August 2017, 04:33 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: NH
Watch: 228239, PAM00684
Posts: 2,121
|
That is crazy...You would think with the backing of Rolex's R&D that this would never happen!
__________________
Rolex 228239 PAM00684 |
30 August 2017, 04:48 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Jeff
Location: USA
Watch: LV
Posts: 395
|
I had the same issue with mine last summer 2 weeks into ownership, despite rinsing after saltwater use. Replaced via RSC gratis. Flipped it so can't comment on repeat damage.
|
30 August 2017, 04:53 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Jeff
Location: USA
Watch: LV
Posts: 395
|
Follow both the inner and outer edges from 3 through 14 or so. |
30 August 2017, 04:55 AM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
|
Quote:
That is the same problem !
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches |
|
30 August 2017, 04:58 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
Maybe Tudor should focus more on their qc issues and less on Beckham and Gaga.
|
30 August 2017, 08:12 AM | #12 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
So if Tudor didn't sign brand ambassadors, this would have never been an issue? Blame Gaga! lol. Here we go again!
|
30 August 2017, 09:05 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
|
30 August 2017, 09:13 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
|
The comment wasnt even relevant.
Secondly bronze corrodes and at contact points corrodes other metals. Simple solution for tudor is to have a bronze bezel insert instead. No excuse but let's not act like its the end of the world. And for anyone saying it never happens with rolex watches remember the non 2.5x mags that rolex passed off on customers and refused to admit were defective....
__________________
If you wind it, they will run. 25 or 6 to 4. |
30 August 2017, 09:22 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
Quote:
|
|
30 August 2017, 09:28 AM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London Uk
Watch: 116610lnBBetaBBhar
Posts: 1,005
|
Quote:
|
|
30 August 2017, 09:17 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 357
|
|
30 August 2017, 09:28 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
I'm not upset. I asked you if you actually think their marketing choices had anything to do with a QC issue on a single model? Judging by your response, I assume you don't.
So now I wonder why you'd make the comment at all. |
30 August 2017, 04:58 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,322
|
little scary, but yea, I tried a quick search online and couldn't find much on the topic. You'd think they've been out quite a while that many others would be facing a similar issue (although the post refers to definite other who noticed black spots/corrosion, just not posting online).
It also notes one where "half the inlay was gone", now that I would want to see a picture of. I mean, if it's something like when un-anodized aluminum (like foil) comes into contact with acidic or salty foods, the definitely could see an issue, but I would have to assume the bronze would have to play an effect given how long Tudor/Rolex have used aluminum inserts, but interesting that the example shown the holes are on the interior of the bezel next to the sapphire, not where the bronze is. |
30 August 2017, 05:01 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
|
Quote:
If you are on the watchprosite website, scroll a bit I made a reply with that specific picture
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches |
|
30 August 2017, 05:11 AM | #21 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,322
|
Quote:
WOW, that looks bad, and some crazy patina on the whole watch. Almost looks like it is forced patina, but obviously someone who surfs everyday would be subjecting that watch to a lot of salt water, so not surprising to see that level of patina on the case. |
|
30 August 2017, 04:58 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
|
Looks like there is a problem. Mine is fine but I have not yet exposed it to salt water - only domestic shower water. It's a dive watch - Tudor need to address this.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M. |
30 August 2017, 05:20 AM | #23 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Ma
Posts: 2,011
|
That sounds like Galvanic Corrosion occuring at the contact point between 2 metals or metal alloys with salt water acting as the electrolyte medium. The holes mentioned by the OP on the bezel insert of the Tudor Bronze are actually called pits.
The greater the difference in oxidation potential between the 2 metals in contact , the more serius is the Galvanic Corrosion. The less nobel or active Aluminium insert of the bezel (acting as the anode) will be eaten away slowly , the more nobel bronze will not corrode and remains inactive (Acting as the cathode) p/s : I grew up near a tradisional fishing village where fishing boats docking at the jetty always show galvanic corrosions at points of contact between nuts and bolts screwed tightly onto metal plates used to strengthen the wooden boats |
30 August 2017, 06:57 AM | #24 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
|
Quote:
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock |
|
30 August 2017, 11:04 AM | #25 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 808
|
As always Megan posts the good stuff! I think you're spot-on, but the one that looks like it has been dipped in acid must be the result of some forced patina or sitting in salt water for an extended period. Mine still looks pretty much like new, but I've noticed a couple of dark spots on the case, probably just a reaction to skin oil. Now that I think about it, I don't think I've ever washed mine or even got it wet.
Quote:
|
|
30 August 2017, 08:29 PM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex n Tudor
Posts: 507
|
Quote:
|
|
8 September 2017, 09:38 AM | #27 | ||||
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,091
|
I'm f*ed.
Please excuse my language but in another thread that listed almost every modern-day bronze watch, my two are the only ones (that I know of) with bezel inserts... So no, I don't dive (anymore) but like 95% of you, I do enjoy vacation at the beach and I would certainly expect to be able to take any "dive" watch in with me... As a (former) recreational diver, I know how important it is to rinse ALL gear with fresh water. Still, it's hard to guarantee that no salt water remains between the case and the bezel - unless you submerge the watch in fresh water for a short period of time. The average beach goer will basically "rinse off" at the local shower and his/her watch will get some fresh water, but there is little chance the owner would go as far as submerging the watch (in fresh water). Bad news all around. Thanks to the OP for bringing it to our attention and for those below for the very informative info. I agree with everyone who are disappointed in Tudor's R&D. I won't be using mine in salt water (having seen / understood this thread) but I also agree with everyone that mentioned a ceramic insert would resolve the issue. They could even be retrofitted for existing owners (at a hopefully nominal fee for those no longer under guarantee). I personally would have to give it some thought because you need to see this insert in person to really appreciate how beautiful it is... (...until it gets eaten away, that is... ) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321 Panerai 111 217 233 Rolex 16600 126600 Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033 Tudor 5B GMT Zénith A386ME Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora |
||||
30 August 2017, 05:36 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Paul
Location: NorCal
Watch: BBN, Damasko, 6105
Posts: 29
|
Yep, I would say Galvanic corrosion as well. Tudor should really look into replacing the aluminum bezel insert with something else, like ceramic.
The Pelagos, in theory, would have this same issue if it had an aluminum insert versus the ceramic. Ti and aluminum are further apart in the scale than bronze and aluminum. |
30 August 2017, 05:49 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Sage
Location: MENA
Posts: 1,563
|
Wow. I expected better QC.
|
30 August 2017, 02:19 PM | #30 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
|
|
Tags |
corrosion , defect |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.