The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 August 2017, 03:49 AM   #1
unknown
"TRF" Member
 
unknown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
BIG Tudor Black Bay Bronze problem

I hope you don't mind I just post a link this time

Most of you know that site too :-)


http://www.watchprosite.com/rolex/so...936.8966566/0/
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches
unknown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 03:52 AM   #2
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
No issues with mine
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 04:09 AM   #3
unknown
"TRF" Member
 
unknown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by beshannon View Post
No issues with mine

Dare to put it in seawater or salt water ?
Let's say 2 hrs in the water, then a few hours out of the water ... and repeat it a couple of times

These watches claim to be made to be used as a diver watch
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches
unknown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 04:33 AM   #4
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by unknown View Post
Dare to put it in seawater or salt water ?
Let's say 2 hrs in the water, then a few hours out of the water ... and repeat it a couple of times

These watches claim to be made to be used as a diver watch
No.

Then again I did not buy it as a divers watch.

And for the record this seems to be the only person having an issue, at least that I have seen posted.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 04:55 AM   #5
unknown
"TRF" Member
 
unknown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by beshannon View Post

And for the record this seems to be the only person having an issue, at least that I have seen posted.
That person is me lol
I made the post

Are you on Instagram? Than you might also know MrTudor... contact him
Believe me, I'm not the only one
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches
unknown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 04:32 AM   #6
vipereaper30
2024 Pledge Member
 
vipereaper30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: BMF
Location: Tennessee USA
Watch: FPJ UTC
Posts: 2,263
Well mine has seen plenty of saltwater with no issues. That case looks like it's been subjected to more than saltwater.

One pic with a minor bezel flaw does not equal a problem, let alone a big one...
vipereaper30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 04:33 AM   #7
wach16
"TRF" Member
 
wach16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: NH
Watch: 228239, PAM00684
Posts: 2,121
That is crazy...You would think with the backing of Rolex's R&D that this would never happen!
__________________

Rolex 228239
PAM00684
wach16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 04:48 AM   #8
cangelosijeff
"TRF" Member
 
cangelosijeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Jeff
Location: USA
Watch: LV
Posts: 395
I had the same issue with mine last summer 2 weeks into ownership, despite rinsing after saltwater use. Replaced via RSC gratis. Flipped it so can't comment on repeat damage.
cangelosijeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 04:53 AM   #9
cangelosijeff
"TRF" Member
 
cangelosijeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Jeff
Location: USA
Watch: LV
Posts: 395


Follow both the inner and outer edges from 3 through 14 or so.
cangelosijeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 04:55 AM   #10
unknown
"TRF" Member
 
unknown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by cangelosijeff View Post


Follow both the inner and outer edges from 3 through 14 or so.

That is the same problem !
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches
unknown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 04:58 AM   #11
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Maybe Tudor should focus more on their qc issues and less on Beckham and Gaga.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 08:12 AM   #12
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
Maybe Tudor should focus more on their qc issues and less on Beckham and Gaga.
So if Tudor didn't sign brand ambassadors, this would have never been an issue? Blame Gaga! lol. Here we go again!
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 09:05 AM   #13
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadridv View Post
So if Tudor didn't sign brand ambassadors, this would have never been an issue? Blame Gaga! lol. Here we go again!
There is no need to be upset.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 09:13 AM   #14
Etschell
"TRF" Member
 
Etschell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: FL
Watch: platinum sub
Posts: 15,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
There is no need to be upset.
The comment wasnt even relevant.

Secondly bronze corrodes and at contact points corrodes other metals. Simple solution for tudor is to have a bronze bezel insert instead.

No excuse but let's not act like its the end of the world.

And for anyone saying it never happens with rolex watches remember the non 2.5x mags that rolex passed off on customers and refused to admit were defective....
__________________
If you wind it, they will run.

25 or 6 to 4.
Etschell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 09:22 AM   #15
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etschell View Post
The comment wasnt even relevant.

Secondly bronze corrodes and at contact points corrodes other metals. Simple solution for tudor is to have a bronze bezel insert instead.

No excuse but let's not act like its the end of the world.

And for anyone saying it never happens with rolex watches remember the non 2.5x mags that rolex passed off on customers and refused to admit were defective....
I was joking. Yes, it's not the end of the world. I hope Tudor fixes the issue.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 09:28 AM   #16
Luap1976
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: London Uk
Watch: 116610lnBBetaBBhar
Posts: 1,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Etschell View Post
The comment wasnt even relevant.

Secondly bronze corrodes and at contact points corrodes other metals. Simple solution for tudor is to have a bronze bezel insert instead.

No excuse but let's not act like its the end of the world.

And for anyone saying it never happens with rolex watches remember the non 2.5x mags that rolex passed off on customers and refused to admit were defective....
Thanks this makes sense now
Luap1976 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 09:17 AM   #17
JohnnyNoDate
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
There is no need to be upset.
Please stop. (cringe)
JohnnyNoDate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 09:28 AM   #18
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
There is no need to be upset.
I'm not upset. I asked you if you actually think their marketing choices had anything to do with a QC issue on a single model? Judging by your response, I assume you don't.

So now I wonder why you'd make the comment at all.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 04:58 AM   #19
osamu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,322
little scary, but yea, I tried a quick search online and couldn't find much on the topic. You'd think they've been out quite a while that many others would be facing a similar issue (although the post refers to definite other who noticed black spots/corrosion, just not posting online).

It also notes one where "half the inlay was gone", now that I would want to see a picture of.

I mean, if it's something like when un-anodized aluminum (like foil) comes into contact with acidic or salty foods, the definitely could see an issue, but I would have to assume the bronze would have to play an effect given how long Tudor/Rolex have used aluminum inserts, but interesting that the example shown the holes are on the interior of the bezel next to the sapphire, not where the bronze is.
osamu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 05:01 AM   #20
unknown
"TRF" Member
 
unknown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,872
Quote:
Originally Posted by osamu View Post

It also notes one where "half the inlay was gone", now that I would want to see a picture of.
Same link as in my first post
If you are on the watchprosite website, scroll a bit
I made a reply with that specific picture
__________________
Instagram : @collectible_watches
unknown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 05:11 AM   #21
osamu
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by unknown View Post
Same link as in my first post
If you are on the watchprosite website, scroll a bit
I made a reply with that specific picture
I had to click like a "view entire thread" button, for anyone else who couldn't see it.

WOW, that looks bad, and some crazy patina on the whole watch. Almost looks like it is forced patina, but obviously someone who surfs everyday would be subjecting that watch to a lot of salt water, so not surprising to see that level of patina on the case.
osamu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 04:58 AM   #22
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
Looks like there is a problem. Mine is fine but I have not yet exposed it to salt water - only domestic shower water. It's a dive watch - Tudor need to address this.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 05:20 AM   #23
meganfox17
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Ma
Posts: 2,011
That sounds like Galvanic Corrosion occuring at the contact point between 2 metals or metal alloys with salt water acting as the electrolyte medium. The holes mentioned by the OP on the bezel insert of the Tudor Bronze are actually called pits.

The greater the difference in oxidation potential between the 2 metals in contact , the more serius is the Galvanic Corrosion. The less nobel or active Aluminium insert of the bezel (acting as the anode) will be eaten away slowly , the more nobel bronze will not corrode and remains inactive (Acting as the cathode)

p/s : I grew up near a tradisional fishing village where fishing boats docking at the jetty always show galvanic corrosions at points of contact between nuts and bolts screwed tightly onto metal plates used to strengthen the wooden boats
meganfox17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 06:57 AM   #24
beshannon
"TRF" Member
 
beshannon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Northern Virginia
Watch: One of Not Many
Posts: 17,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by meganfox17 View Post
That sounds like Galvanic Corrosion occuring at the contact point between 2 metals or metal alloys with salt water acting as the electrolyte medium. The holes mentioned by the OP on the bezel insert of the Tudor Bronze are actually called pits.

The greater the difference in oxidation potential between the 2 metals in contact , the more serius is the Galvanic Corrosion. The less nobel or active Aluminium insert of the bezel (acting as the anode) will be eaten away slowly , the more nobel bronze will not corrode and remains inactive (Acting as the cathode)

p/s : I grew up near a tradisional fishing village where fishing boats docking at the jetty always show galvanic corrosions at points of contact between nuts and bolts screwed tightly onto metal plates used to strengthen the wooden boats
Good analysis, sorry to anyone having issues. I never intended mine to be a dive watch so this thought never crossed my mind. Not sure what Rolex can do at this point except keep replacing them under warranty.
__________________
IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock
beshannon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 11:04 AM   #25
josephvman
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 808
As always Megan posts the good stuff! I think you're spot-on, but the one that looks like it has been dipped in acid must be the result of some forced patina or sitting in salt water for an extended period. Mine still looks pretty much like new, but I've noticed a couple of dark spots on the case, probably just a reaction to skin oil. Now that I think about it, I don't think I've ever washed mine or even got it wet.


Quote:
Originally Posted by meganfox17 View Post
That sounds like Galvanic Corrosion occuring at the contact point between 2 metals or metal alloys with salt water acting as the electrolyte medium. The holes mentioned by the OP on the bezel insert of the Tudor Bronze are actually called pits.

The greater the difference in oxidation potential between the 2 metals in contact , the more serius is the Galvanic Corrosion. The less nobel or active Aluminium insert of the bezel (acting as the anode) will be eaten away slowly , the more nobel bronze will not corrode and remains inactive (Acting as the cathode)

p/s : I grew up near a tradisional fishing village where fishing boats docking at the jetty always show galvanic corrosions at points of contact between nuts and bolts screwed tightly onto metal plates used to strengthen the wooden boats
josephvman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 08:29 PM   #26
James444
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Singapore
Watch: Rolex n Tudor
Posts: 507
Quote:
Originally Posted by josephvman View Post
As always Megan posts the good stuff! I think you're spot-on, but the one that looks like it has been dipped in acid must be the result of some forced patina or sitting in salt water for an extended period. Mine still looks pretty much like new, but I've noticed a couple of dark spots on the case, probably just a reaction to skin oil. Now that I think about it, I don't think I've ever washed mine or even got it wet.
There is a crack in the dial too. Yup skin oil do leave dark spot on the case mine also got dark spot due to skin oil btw I think Tudor should discontinue this model first
James444 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 September 2017, 09:38 AM   #27
Travelller
2024 Pledge Member
 
Travelller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: VIE
Watch: my sig. ;)
Posts: 3,091
Icon9

I'm f*ed.


Please excuse my language but in another thread that listed almost every modern-day bronze watch, my two are the only ones (that I know of) with bezel inserts...
So no, I don't dive (anymore) but like 95% of you, I do enjoy vacation at the beach and I would certainly expect to be able to take any "dive" watch in with me...



As a (former) recreational diver, I know how important it is to rinse ALL gear with fresh water. Still, it's hard to guarantee that no salt water remains between the case and the bezel - unless you submerge the watch in fresh water for a short period of time. The average beach goer will basically "rinse off" at the local shower and his/her watch will get some fresh water, but there is little chance the owner would go as far as submerging the watch (in fresh water).

Bad news all around.

Thanks to the OP for bringing it to our attention and for those below for the very informative info. I agree with everyone who are disappointed in Tudor's R&D. I won't be using mine in salt water (having seen / understood this thread) but I also agree with everyone that mentioned a ceramic insert would resolve the issue. They could even be retrofitted for existing owners (at a hopefully nominal fee for those no longer under guarantee). I personally would have to give it some thought because you need to see this insert in person to really appreciate how beautiful it is...
(...until it gets eaten away, that is... )





Quote:
Originally Posted by cangelosijeff View Post
Follow both the inner and outer edges from 3 through 14 or so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by meganfox17 View Post
That sounds like Galvanic Corrosion occuring at the contact point between 2 metals or metal alloys with salt water acting as the electrolyte medium. The holes mentioned by the OP on the bezel insert of the Tudor Bronze are actually called pits. The greater the difference in oxidation potential between the 2 metals in contact , the more serious is the Galvanic Corrosion...
Quote:
Originally Posted by 77T View Post
It appears the insert is acting as an anode in conjunction with the bronze - much like zinc is used on metal boat hulls....
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomilg View Post
It is the same reason you attach Zinc Anodes to the underside of a boat that is used or moored in a saltwater environment...because of Galvanic Corrosion, the saltwater will eat away the Zinc instead of your pricey bronze propeller(s).........In this case, instead of the Zinc being slowly eaten away, it the bezel which is acting as the sacrificial lamb.
__________________
Traveller - Genève * Melbourne * Miami * Wien
Breitling AVI 765r Navitimer 806r
Omega 3572.50 SM300MC Speedy Tuesday Caliber 321
Panerai 111 217 233
Rolex 16600 126600
Seiko SBGA125 SBDX001 SLA017 SLA025 SLA033
Tudor 5B GMT
Zénith A386ME
Other Mühle Glashütte S.A.R. Flieger Chronoswiss Tora
Travelller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 05:36 AM   #28
Buellrider
"TRF" Member
 
Buellrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Paul
Location: NorCal
Watch: BBN, Damasko, 6105
Posts: 29
Yep, I would say Galvanic corrosion as well. Tudor should really look into replacing the aluminum bezel insert with something else, like ceramic.

The Pelagos, in theory, would have this same issue if it had an aluminum insert versus the ceramic. Ti and aluminum are further apart in the scale than bronze and aluminum.
Buellrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 05:49 AM   #29
sager
"TRF" Member
 
sager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Sage
Location: MENA
Posts: 1,563
Wow. I expected better QC.
sager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2017, 02:19 PM   #30
JP Chestnut
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ann Arbor MI
Watch: Rolex Ref 16600
Posts: 3,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by sager View Post
Wow. I expected better QC.
It's not QC. It's piss poor engineering from a near fashion brand. I've seen the same galvanic corrosion on the stupid useless colored crown spacer on the BB.
JP Chestnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
corrosion , defect


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.