ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

TimeToGo · 23 November 2008, 11:33 AM

Listing has a miscellaneous number referred as 169622, which if it was a model number would respond to a yachtmaster.

Comments?!

http://cgi.ebay.com/Rolex-Ladies-Dia...1%7C240%3A1318

ashe18c · 23 November 2008, 12:48 PM

If it is real, the bezel must be aftermarket. Although seller has perfect feedback, has only ten, too low to trust with that amount of money. Hard to tell, tag looks real. Bezel does not. The serial number on tag starts with A, so it is about a 2000 model. The bracelet and case does not look like the newer more solid model. Hmmm...

Orchi · 23 November 2008, 01:00 PM

Err buddies...this listing has to be torched...!

The last transaction by this Seller was more than 1 year ago...in Jun 2007.
Seller claims the watch has a DATE function but the picture of the watch doesn't show any.
Seller claims the watch has Ref 169622...but the watch does not look like it.
Seller claims the watch has "Original Paper & Box"...but NO picture to prove it.
The Hang Tag doesn't belong to that watch originally.
ONLY 1 blur pic which is inadequate to substantiate the authenticity of the watch n auction.
Seller claims the watch has 3.5 carats of C-1 diamonds...which he has NO means to substantiate his own claims...

Orchi smells a rat here...!

Terry Newton · 23 November 2008, 01:23 PM

Orchi:

The RAT IS HUGE.

Terry Newton

stevemulholland3 · 23 November 2008, 02:29 PM

it should be smoking soon..I hope.

TimeToGo · 24 November 2008, 01:03 AM

Gone!!!

23 November 2008, 01:23 PM	#4
Terry Newton "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Terry Newton Location: Michigan Watch: Rolex TT GMT II c Posts: 6,644	Orchi: The RAT IS HUGE. Terry Newton __________________ Terry Newton; Superstar and Fake Sleuth "Z" SS Date Submariner "Z" TT GMT-Master IIc

23 November 2008, 12:48 PM	#2
ashe18c Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Vincent Location: central jersey Posts: 78	If it is real, the bezel must be aftermarket. Although seller has perfect feedback, has only ten, too low to trust with that amount of money. Hard to tell, tag looks real. Bezel does not. The serial number on tag starts with A, so it is about a 2000 model. The bracelet and case does not look like the newer more solid model. Hmmm...

23 November 2008, 01:00 PM	#3
Orchi Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Malaysia Posts: 2,934	Err buddies...this listing has to be torched...! The last transaction by this Seller was more than 1 year ago...in Jun 2007. Seller claims the watch has a DATE function but the picture of the watch doesn't show any. Seller claims the watch has Ref 169622...but the watch does not look like it. Seller claims the watch has "Original Paper & Box"...but NO picture to prove it. The Hang Tag doesn't belong to that watch originally. ONLY 1 blur pic which is inadequate to substantiate the authenticity of the watch n auction. Seller claims the watch has 3.5 carats of C-1 diamonds...which he has NO means to substantiate his own claims... Orchi smells a rat here...!

23 November 2008, 02:29 PM	#5
stevemulholland3 Banned Join Date: Dec 2007 Real Name: steven Location: tampa bay Watch: 1680 18k sub Posts: 6,672	it should be smoking soon..I hope.

24 November 2008, 01:03 AM	#6
TimeToGo 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: North Florida Posts: 16,713	Gone!!!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)