The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 July 2018, 11:55 PM   #1
SFBAY
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 546
Sub vs BLNR fit?

Does the BLNR fit the same as a sub on your wrist?
SFBAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:00 AM   #2
Lemonvr6
"TRF" Member
 
Lemonvr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 463
Other than glidelock adjustability they feel the same to me
__________________
116710BLNR, 116610LV, 114060, 116710LN
Lemonvr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:07 AM   #3
MrWhy
"TRF" Member
 
MrWhy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: TJ
Location: UK
Watch: Changes weekly
Posts: 155
They sit quite similar. The sub has a taller/thicker caseback because if the 300m resistance.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MrWhy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:08 AM   #4
fdm79
"TRF" Member
 
fdm79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Norway
Posts: 931
Exactly the same to me !

__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 126710 BLRO - Rolex Submariner 116610 LV - Breitling Navitimer 01 Pan-American Bronze Limited Edition AB0121C4/Q605-447A - Omega Speedmaster Moonwatch Professional 3861 (Sapphire) 310.30.42.50.01.002 - Omega Seamaster Diver 300M 41mm Ceramic (Blue) 212.30.41.20.03.001
fdm79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:09 AM   #5
Cyclops888
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Europe
Posts: 320
I have same lin-up as MRwhy.
I prefer the sub due to its adjustability.
GMT has a half link adjustment.

With the sub you are more flexible throughout the year.
Cyclops888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:12 AM   #6
Raku
"TRF" Member
 
Raku's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: London, UK
Watch: Rolex Explorer
Posts: 361
Also the Submariner has a longer clasp (as can be seen in TJ's photo above).
This can annoy people with smaller wrists.
Raku is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2018, 07:55 AM   #7
Navarino
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 3,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raku View Post
Also the Submariner has a longer clasp (as can be seen in TJ's photo above).
This can annoy people with smaller wrists.
I never noticed this! Will definitely take a look at this myself when I get home from work.

Personally I do notice a difference in wearing the two watches. The increased height/thickness of the Sub is something I definitely take note of if I put it on after wearing my BLNR for awhile.
Navarino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:17 AM   #8
T01
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: T
Location: AZ, NV, CA
Posts: 6,490
Fit is very similar, however the GMT sits a little lower on the wrist. Hard to beat the flexibility of adjustment with the glidelock though, the half link in the GMT simply doesn't compare. Both outstanding choices nonetheless.
T01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2018, 08:37 AM   #9
jps3b
"TRF" Member
 
jps3b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Santa Monica, Ca
Watch: 116619
Posts: 1,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by T01 View Post
Fit is very similar, however the GMT sits a little lower on the wrist. Hard to beat the flexibility of adjustment with the glidelock though, the half link in the GMT simply doesn't compare. Both outstanding choices nonetheless.


Completely agree
jps3b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:21 AM   #10
PLNYC
"TRF" Member
 
PLNYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mars
Posts: 1,683
I like the fit of the gmt more because of the flatter case back. Throw is glidelock on it and you’ll have the best fitting Rolex imo
__________________
PLNYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:22 AM   #11
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
Have owned both. The GMT2C was slightly more comfortable.
It's a very small amount. The slight thickness/weight over the GMT2C made the Sub constantly slide along my wrist bone. This will likely be different for different shaped wrists but it was my experience.
I would generally say that the difference in wear is negligeable, but in my case I noticed it.

Now if you want to hear something really strange, my Deepseas so far have been my most comfortable watches. Probably because the thick casebacks which creates a gap for my wrist bone to rest in. It is heavier but sits more comfy on my wrist.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:23 AM   #12
mdgrwl
2024 Pledge Member
 
mdgrwl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: US East Coast
Watch: Dealer
Posts: 15,566
The sub has a slightly more squared off lug look vs. the GMT
mdgrwl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:25 AM   #13
joli160
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joli160's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,739
The GMT sits a bit more balanced, think it is because of the clasp which I prefer over the glidelock
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711.
joli160 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:49 AM   #14
Jmbarrack
"TRF" Member
 
Jmbarrack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: United States
Watch: Ever changing!
Posts: 1,150
No they don't fit the same for me. I have a smaller wrist, 6 3/4 inches. The sub case back being even a few mm thicker didn't sit as well as the GMT with the flatter case back on my wrist.

Try both on first for sure. Because I really wanted a sub, but wrist fit sealed it for me with the GMT.
Jmbarrack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:55 AM   #15
Likestheshiny
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: _
Posts: 1,877
I feel a bit of a difference on my smaller wrist as well. The sub rides a little higher, and the longer clasp makes the bracelet a little less flexible. It's not an especially big difference, but I do notice it.

Semi-related question -- are the casebacks compatible? Can you stick a GMT caseback on a sub to make it a little thinner? Obviously the WR would suffer, but I'm really quite unlikely to reach seven times the maximum depth for recreational diving, so it wouldn't be much of a loss.
Likestheshiny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 02:14 AM   #16
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Likestheshiny View Post
I feel a bit of a difference on my smaller wrist as well. The sub rides a little higher, and the longer clasp makes the bracelet a little less flexible. It's not an especially big difference, but I do notice it.

Semi-related question -- are the casebacks compatible? Can you stick a GMT caseback on a sub to make it a little thinner? Obviously the WR would suffer, but I'm really quite unlikely to reach seven times the maximum depth for recreational diving, so it wouldn't be much of a loss.
Some one started a thread on this. It can be done. Obviously the waterproofing will be reduced and you'll need to have a pro do a pressure test.
Not something I would do at all as the compromise isn't worth it and the Submariner is incredibly comfortable. I take this thread as just another wis point of interest digging in the weeds.
Omega, Breitling and even AP make some bigger watches and the Submariner is far more comfortable.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 12:56 AM   #17
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
Felt pretty much the same to me.

AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 July 2018, 01:46 AM   #18
jaisonline
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
jaisonline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Watch: 5 digit models
Posts: 1,516
i own both (6 digit models). will post pics later / after work.

the sub had more of a "bubble back" case so it sits higher on the wrist. the gmt sits lower on the wrist. overall sub height is about 12.8mm in height (case back to crystal excluding cyclops) while the gmt is about 12.2mm.

folks around commented on the clasp difference.

personally, i like how the gmt lays better on the wrist.
jaisonline is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2018, 07:45 AM   #19
Beowulf
"TRF" Member
 
Beowulf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: European Union
Posts: 244
Ultimately the SubC will be more comfortable since you can adjust it with extreme precision using GlideLock. People who like to have the watch with zero wobble but without being too tight know what I mean. It fits just right.

Lately I have been adjusting multiple times a week due to variations in temperature/humidity in the weather here.

That said, I find the 116610LN the most comfortable watch I have. I did not expect it to be more comfy than some rubber/leather straps but the perfect sizing is awesome.
Beowulf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2018, 07:55 AM   #20
Bladeshot
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Bladeshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Grant
Location: U.S.
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG Gilt
Posts: 5,850
GMT has more narrow lugs and looks less squarish. As said by others, glidelock is superior for adjustment but is much longer. For my 7.25” wrist the GMT 116719 fits me best. I like the look of the GMT best, and I enjoy the 116619, too. Good luck! No wrong choice. Try them both on. That’s a must.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Just another WIS who loves to trade...
Bladeshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2018, 07:57 AM   #21
RJRJRJ
"TRF" Member
 
RJRJRJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 3,495
Both are very comfortable to me, but the GMT is more comfortable and I can fit it under shirt cuffs, whereas I have trouble doing that with the sub. The glidelock on the sub is far superior to the ez link though imo.
RJRJRJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2018, 09:10 AM   #22
ra77man
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: lala land
Posts: 248
sub's a slightly better (adjustable) fit because of glide-lock.

p.s. I'm OCD about fit.
ra77man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2018, 03:34 PM   #23
Nairn1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Watch: GMT
Posts: 8,385
I have both and find my GMT slightly more comfortable,
Nairn1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2018, 04:45 PM   #24
nikesupremedunk
"TRF" Member
 
nikesupremedunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
I must be super sensitive because I find the difference in how they wear to be huge. The gmt fits my wrist so much better than my sub does, even with the glide lock. The thicker case back in the sub makes it sit higher on my wrist and not even the glide lock can change that. Gmt sits almost flat on my wrist and there is enough adjustment on the easy link to get you that perfect fit.

The sub isn’t uncomfortable but the gmt fits like a tailored suit at least for me.
__________________
| 116234 DJ36 | 116610LN SubC | 116520 Daytona | BlackBay 58 Blue |
nikesupremedunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2018, 04:58 PM   #25
Stevec14
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: U.K.
Watch: 321, Snoopy 3
Posts: 4,470
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikesupremedunk View Post
I must be super sensitive because I find the difference in how they wear to be huge. The gmt fits my wrist so much better than my sub does, even with the glide lock. The thicker case back in the sub makes it sit higher on my wrist and not even the glide lock can change that. Gmt sits almost flat on my wrist and there is enough adjustment on the easy link to get you that perfect fit.

The sub isn’t uncomfortable but the gmt fits like a tailored suit at least for me.


Agreed. Both are comfortable, but I always preferred the flatter fit of the gmt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Stevec14 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27 July 2018, 05:03 PM   #26
speedbird90
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: N/A
Watch: 16710, 16610LV
Posts: 137
While I absolutely love the Hulk, I have to admit the GMT fits my wrist better. As many have mentioned, two major points:

1. The claps of the sub is longer which means more sliding for my wrist. Tends to slide to the top 'top heavy' no matter how many times I adjusted the glidelock, tried 'balancing' the links and half links. Moved them from the 12 side to the 6, and then back again, tried just about every click on the glidelock, just didn't seem to fit me well. I guess the sub isn't for me.

2. That 300m water resistant case is slightly thicker than the GMT's but it's very noticeable which made the sub slide for me. Could never really get it to just sit perfectly at the center of my wrist.

That being said, the GMT fits my wrist perfectly. The fit of the sub made me sell by 116610, and call me crazy, but I'm now looking for a Hulk!
speedbird90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 July 2018, 02:53 AM   #27
Kowlick
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: California
Posts: 33
I just got the BLNR and it fits better than the SubC for me. I have a 6.75” flat, bony wrist and the caseback on the SubC really elevates it off the wrist. The SubC doesn’t feel as planted or snug as the BLNR. I love the Glidelock but the Easylink works well enough.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kowlick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.