ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
26 January 2019, 04:54 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: London
Posts: 22
|
New purchase! (and questions): 5513 Sub from 1974
Hello all, here’s my new purchase. My first vintage piece! I’m a really happy owner of a 1974 Submariner 5513 serial 379...
Here are some pictures below. And I have a couple of questions for you if someone would help me :) First of all an opinion on the overall watch and condition. If you think that there are any problems with it. I’m not an expert but I already noticed that the clasp (Or entire bracelet) is from 1984 (marked “i4”). I also believe that the bezel is a later one because the font and markets seem too thin, correct?). Shouldn’t this watch have a “fat font” bezel? Also, it didn’t come with box or papers. Do you think that I should source the period correct parts for it, including box? And if so, would you help me know which are the correct parts? Did this come with a 93150 bracelet or the 9351? And is the correct box the 67.00.3 or the 10.00.1? Thank you in advance for your help. Simon |
26 January 2019, 06:52 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Bob
Location: Uk
Posts: 54
|
Looks a nice honest non serif dial watch that is at the latter end of serial numbers for this example according to Beaumont's excellent website. The insert seems to be a mid font from the 80ies which ties in with the bracelet, likely changed together at service. Not too many around in the UK so a good catch.
|
26 January 2019, 08:29 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Markus
Location: Kassel, Germany
Watch: Rolex,Zenith,Tudor
Posts: 47
|
Hi Simon,
i think the watch was serviced in the 80ies. You have to re-done some things - but without box and papers i wouldn't do that - it s a nice watch - if you can get sometime a 1974 oyster bracelet - buy it - but the are not "cheap" - and maybe not in this shape like your newer bracelet. Can you post a picture of the crown - screwed out - so we can see the tube ? Maybe it is also changed at a service. Greetings from Germany MaG |
26 January 2019, 09:53 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: London
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
Here are the pics, let mew know if they’re ok Thanks :) Simon |
|
26 January 2019, 10:12 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 50
|
Congrats on the new watch! I’m no expert but it is beautiful to my eye!
|
26 January 2019, 10:38 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Scandinavia
Watch: ♛
Posts: 1,330
|
Why ask about crown tube? I thought in 1974 all were upgraded to Triplocks anyway.
Yes, watch should have a mk3 fat font insert, expensive about 1200-1800$ but will make a nice cosmetic upgrade. Should also have a 9315 bracelet but wouldn’t upgrade that since it is difficult to adjust, rattles, and most prefer your style solid 93150. Box makes no sense without papers, and usually smell anyway. Very cool 5513, wouldn’t surprise me if the original owner bought it after watching Roger Moore in Live and let die, back in 1973 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Insta |
27 January 2019, 12:20 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: England
Posts: 518
|
Looks very nice, congrats. The hand lume looked a bit sunken in the first pic but may just be the pic.
I’d get someone to do at least (if you’re not servicing it) a replacement set of seals so you know she’s water tight. That pendant tube gasket looks quite old (flat) and has a few holes in its surface. |
27 January 2019, 03:44 AM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,981
|
Nice-looking Sub, with some later parts as noted, and a good case that was polished but still fat. I wouldn't bother tracking down accessories. I always feel that unless you have the original Rolex guarantee paper, why bother with everything else?
Your watch could have also come on a Rolex rivet bracelet, which I love for the cool factor, but they are a bit flimsy. Note that a 3.7 million serial could be a little earlier than '74. Have you had a look at the inside of the case back, with the date stamp? I have a 3.7 million 5512 that has a caseback stamped for '72. My rivet bracelet is stamped '73. |
27 January 2019, 04:00 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Markus
Location: Kassel, Germany
Watch: Rolex,Zenith,Tudor
Posts: 47
|
> Thank you mag,
> Here are the pics, let mew know if they’re ok > Thanks :) > Simon in my personal opinion, this is not a 1974 style tube and it s also upgraded maybe in the 80ies. So you have a ~1974 5513 with some features upgraded to the latest specifications. That s total OK and fine, when you use it as watch for your daily joy and timekeeping. As mentioned, please let a watchmaker change the gaskets and keep the original parts at a service & enjoy your 5513 :-) |
10 February 2019, 08:46 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: London
Posts: 22
|
Thank you all for your help and suggestions. I’ll follow your advice. For now I’m super happy to have purchased this watch and I’ll enjoy it for years to come.
Best Simon Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.